|
|
click to play |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1224673)
doesn't mean there was no plot, just means they were horrible movies.
|
im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
|
4 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1224822)
im still trying to figure out the thought process of introducing a Michelle Tanner character.
Is the Force strong with her? Also, I finally figured out why the trailer touched a special place in my heart. This: http://www.ew.com/sites/default/file...-solo-2015.jpg = this: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1429539433 That had to be done on purpose. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1429539433 |
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1224867)
Unrelated: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1429540389 |
because it's cute and clever?
is episode 7 not fanfiction? |
2 Attachment(s)
|
whom seems incorrect in this usage.
The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle. the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he. "I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont fuck with me." would be better. |
Did you go to Southern Illinois University by any chance?
|
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1225014)
whom seems incorrect in this usage.
The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle. the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he. "I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont fuck with me." would be better. Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct. |
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1225014)
whom seems incorrect in this usage.
The cat--he--is someone you do not wish to trifle. the whom is referring back to the cat, not you/he. "I'm not someone who you wish to trifle." or "dont fuck with me." would be better. The cat is correct. The cat is not someone with whom you should trifle. |
1 Attachment(s)
|
This is much cooler since the guy lands all over the place. Like on mountains and hills and shit.
|
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
(Post 1225028)
No, "whom" refers not to "I" (the cat) but to "someone".
Since the structure is "I am not someone," that means that "whom" is referring to the object of the sentence, and is therefore correct. :party: dunce cap. but I am someone who still thinks that I am correct. |
Well, it's actually the object of the preposition. "with", hence the objective case.
A reverse case is when you say something like, "He is cross with whoever gets in his way". In that case, "whoever gets" is a noun clause, in which, "whoever" is the subject, "gets" is the verb, respectively of that clause; so use the nominative case, "whoever" instead of "whomever". The clause is the object of the preposition "with" in that instance. |
1 Attachment(s)
|
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM. |
|
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands