![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 847178)
(A single team could hold possession of the ball for an entire half, neither achieving a goal nor forfeiting possession of the ball, simply by alternating between periods of incremental gain in field position and instantaneous large losses of field position as by a reverse-pass.)
However, you left out the actual way they might retain possession indefinitely -- penalties. If, after said failed reverse, and now facing the 2nd down and 30 yards to go, the defense commits a penalty that results in less yardage gained than the previous loss (basically, anything other than pass interference on a long pass attempt) but awards a 1st down to the offense, the offense could conceivably continue to reset the downs (via the penalty) while not gaining any total yardage. Make sense? |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
(Post 847226)
Make sense?
Now, let's do a big of light Googleing. Ah, here we are: If a team started a drive on their own 1-yard line, took 4 downs to make a first down every time, got just enough every time to get the first down, allowed the play clock to nearly expire before every play, took 5 seconds to run each play, never threw an incomplete pass, and the clock never stopped... that would mean 1 play was run every 50 seconds. It would take 4 plays to get to the 11-yard line, 4 more to get to the 21-yard line, etc, for a total of 40 plays to get a touchdown. These 40 plays would take 2,000 seconds, or 33 minutes, 20 seconds. However, even if the drive started at the beginning of the game, or the beginning of the second half, the drive would end at the end of the half, for a maximum of 30 minutes. So from a practical standpoint, it looks like you can indeed hold posession of the ball for an entire half, thus allowing for only two "regular" commercial breaks (end of quarter and 2 minute warning) and forcing 8 TV Timeouts. I wonder what the real-world record is for this? |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 847209)
http://nfm.com http://dkl3fnj1o5loa.cloudfront.net/...iture-mart.jpg
Originally Posted by Pen2_the_penguin
(Post 847212)
terrible acoustics placement, breh.
Originally Posted by Godless Commie
(Post 847213)
I was just debating whether or not I should post something to that effect.
Didn't wanna rain on his parade.. Oh well, TV is too high, too. There.
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 847224)
it's also really small, like his penis
|
|
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 847373)
This car might be quick as fawk but it's still HORRIBLE looking and has a really shitty transmission. |
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 847373)
------- FAST CAR!
|
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 847373)
Inferior GTR
Fast |
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 847391)
Slow
Fast |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 847395)
Didn't look fast to me. Looked like it was sitting still on a dyno. Any clips of it ACTUALLY going fast? HP numbers don't mean ----.
That video is only 3 days old. It's the new Alpha Omega from AMS. I'm sure they will get video of it demolishing everything the world can throw at it soon. The Alpha 12 has been setting, literally, every record for the GTR. The Alpha 12 is something like 1300~whp, the Omega is 1600~whp. Keep in mind that these are full weight, street cars. |
Forget football! US or Euro type. THIS is the future...
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 847209)
|
|
Cat too big.
|
|
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 847414)
|
It doesn't matter much to me as long as he's relived.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 847490)
It doesn't matter much to me as long as he's relived.
fiend club points if you get the reference. |
aw i dont!
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
|
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands