![]() |
|
Originally Posted by golftdibrad
(Post 923890)
nerd.
|
What, one was at the big 3? :D
One makes beautiful cars.. the other one spits out garbage that doesnt even want to start in the morning. |
3 Attachment(s)
Sexy all up in this bitch. 14x7 +19 RPF1, 195/60 Star Specs.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1346967058 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1346967058 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1346967058 :makeout: |
I love my RPF1's. I'm glad I kept them.
|
Those are cute. Planning on rallying them with the 60 profile tires?
|
I plan on rolling on them. I don't think my car will be exposed to motorsports any time soon. I just love that this wheel/tire combo is as light as my stock hollow spoke 14x6 and 185/60 Shititomo tires, while being sexier, wider and far far far more sticky.
|
|
Originally Posted by triple88a
(Post 923904)
Those are cute. Planning on rallying them with the 60 profile tires?
|
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
(Post 923908)
That comment is funny until you come down here and drive on our shitty roads. It's worth noting that one of my 15" RPF1's has a bent lip.
|
I'm keeping these 15" RPF1's since I got such a stupid good deal on them...but if I had my druthers, I'd be going to 14x7" as well. I don't need massive brakes on the street, just good pads.
|
Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
(Post 923915)
I'm keeping these 15" RPF1's since I got such a stupid good deal on them...but if I had my druthers, I'd be going to 14x7" as well. I don't need massive brakes on the street, just good pads.
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Needs moar rainbowwwwssssssss.
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 923868)
The following is not a sarcastic reply:
It depends on a number of different factors. Some are obvious, such as what were your net revenues for the product line. If the total burdened cost to produce and sell one unit is $390, then obviously it's better to sell 10m at $599 than to sell 40m at $399. Another would involve an analysis of one's market demographics relative to one's corporate strategy. I'd wager, for example, that Fendi probably sells fewer shoes in a year than JC Penny, and they probably captured less total revenue in doing so. But Fendi's brand is built upon an image of exclusivity, and so doing a lower volume of business than JC Penny is entirely appropriate for them. Then you start to get into the really intriguing stuff which may sound entirely outlandish to those who have never had the pleasure of working within the infrastructure of a giant holding company. For instance, what was the margin on the device in question? Depending on who is doing the analysis, it is in fact sometimes "better" to sell a small number of units *AND* collect a small amount of revenue, provided that you maintain a very high margin in doing so. I know it sounds ludicrous, and from a macroeconomic point of view it is, but within Harris Broadcast, for instance, I've seen whole product lines get shitcanned because they were only operating at 10-15% margin, despite the fact that they were moving such enormous volumes of product that their net revenues far outstripped other departments with 1/10th the total receipts but 3x the gross margin. Long story short: in business, especially at the corporate level, it's important to understand that sometimes there really ARE five lights, even if you can only see four of them from where you're standing. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 923891)
I hate Apple more because of the douchy group of people that buy up their products at the drop of a hat, over the fact that they make sub par quality junk, in my experience. I have owned 3 products from Apple, and all were of lower build quality and all failed far more quickly than similar products from other brands.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1346985321 |
WTF is FAME?
|
Full-Motion Video Asset Management Engine
Basically for the military, it's a video sink for databasing, tagging, metadata, and being able to search and play back based on those tags, location, time, etc. There's also support for overlays and multiplexing of data, too. Harris Corporation Full-Motion Video Asset Management Engine Meets All Pilot Program Objectives During Empire Challenge 2008 |
You're with Harris too?
I must say- the one part I am really looking forward to in the divestiture is being cut free from the corporate IT/IS department. I realize that y'all down in Melbourne work on classified shit, but out here in BCD we can barely get anything done on a Standard Client anymore. To be fair, the folks in Mason have been fucking things up ever since the Flag was moved out of Quincy... |
Yeah, I don't blame you. I think they sit around thinking of ways to make everyone's life more difficult at Harris. Luckily I have admin rights and all our field and lab computers are unmolested by them.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM. |
|
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands