Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

109,000 HP ...is that enough for you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2009, 06:43 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mrtonyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
Default 109,000 HP ...is that enough for you?

Just when you thought that Top Fuel cars were high horsepower...

Check out these specs and click the link for more info:

109,000 HP @ 102 RPM

5.5 million foot pounds of torque


http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/

Thanks samnavy, corrected the link.

Last edited by mrtonyg; 02-09-2009 at 08:44 PM. Reason: link edit
mrtonyg is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 07:03 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

That link goes to some not-english login page.
samnavy is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 07:51 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
deliverator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 731
Total Cats: 2
Default

Suddenly I'm not so impressed with the LS1 dyno chart someone posted up a few days ago.


Nevermind that an LS1 can fit in a Miata and that a Miata could probably fit inside this beast.
deliverator is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 08:08 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
miatamania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
Default

I bet that bitch would be fun with a lightened crank
miatamania is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 08:32 PM
  #5  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

that answer is always more boost.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 08:44 PM
  #6  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Wow. I've seen those pictures, but never read the specs before.

Five MILLION foot/lbs.



How do you measure that? Seems like it'd just pick up the building the dyno is in and throw it across town.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 09:47 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
icantthink4155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Longs, SC
Posts: 2,566
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Five point six MILLION foot/lbs.
Fixed, 600,000lb/ft is nothing to sneeze at.
icantthink4155 is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 10:52 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

I found this fact about that motor astonishing:
Even at its most efficient power setting, the big 14 consumes 1,660 gallons of heavy fuel oil per hour.

The original F-14A in ZONE-5 afterburner at low altitude consumed 70kPPH... per engine. That's 140,000 lbs of fuel per hour... or 20,600 gallons per hour or 340 gallons per minute or 6 gallons per second.

The Tomcat carried 16,000 internal, and 3800 external... which means if a Tomcat "A" selected ZONE-5 off the catapult and never pulled the throttle back, he'd flame out in just over 8 minutes.
samnavy is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 11:06 PM
  #9  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

needs a tubular manifold and sheet-metal intake.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 11:12 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 15
Default

How do you start that thing? Turning that crank, with all that heavy ****, is not an easy job I would imagine.
Bond is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 11:17 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
mrtonyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
How do you start that thing? Turning that crank, with all that heavy ****, is not an easy job I would imagine.
These huge engines are usually started by injecting compressed air into the combustion chambers to turn the crank.

They are also direct drive, meaning there is no transmission. So if they need reverse, they spin the engine backwards....very cool stuff!

edit: I think I am wrong with the compressed air being used on this engine to start it, I see a flywheel with teeth!

Last edited by mrtonyg; 02-09-2009 at 11:35 PM.
mrtonyg is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 11:21 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,292
Total Cats: 475
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
How do you start that thing? Turning that crank, with all that heavy ****, is not an easy job I would imagine.
Big 3 phase motors. Have to phone the power company before starting it.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 02-09-2009, 11:24 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
zzyx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 124
Total Cats: 0
Default

Spec says the thing is turbo... I want to see THAT thing. GT3057075560048?
zzyx7 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 12:09 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 15
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Big 3 phase motors. Have to phone the power company before starting it.
Jeezalou,

I want one!
Bond is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 12:44 AM
  #15  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by zzyx7
Spec says the thing is turbo... I want to see THAT thing. GT3057075560048?
disco potato can make anything more powerful.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:18 AM
  #16  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Big 3 phase motors. Have to phone the power company before starting it.
Sounds familiar. When we built a pair of 2 megawatt AM transmitters about 10 years ago at the main factory in Quincy, IL, they were only able to run them at full power at night, and only after calling up the electrical supplier to inform them of the load, as well as to inform them when it was about to be switched off.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:52 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
I found this fact about that motor astonishing:
Even at its most efficient power setting, the big 14 consumes 1,660 gallons of heavy fuel oil per hour.

The original F-14A in ZONE-5 afterburner at low altitude consumed 70kPPH... per engine. That's 140,000 lbs of fuel per hour... or 20,600 gallons per hour or 340 gallons per minute or 6 gallons per second.
You didn't catch what size injectors they're running did you?
pdexta is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:59 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
boardboy330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brunswick, Maryland
Posts: 258
Total Cats: 0
Default

I want two...one for each miata. Wonder what kind of lubrication they are using...probably the blood and tears of emo kids...that's what I use.
boardboy330 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:45 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
the_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MD/DE/PA
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 0
Default

They are obviously running 109,000 PC-Pros in parallel, and therefore need neither cooling nor lubrication.
the_man is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 12:14 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

Saw this thing a year ago, the 50% thermal efficiency is the most amazing part.
gospeed81 is offline  


Quick Reply: 109,000 HP ...is that enough for you?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM.