Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2015, 02:09 PM
  #23541  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
WTH was being installed for the last hour?
The windows 10 installer
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 02:24 PM
  #23542  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
WTH was being installed for the last hour?
Malware.

--Ian
codrus is online now  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:02 PM
  #23543  
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
hi_im_sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,142
Default

speaking of windows 10, bueno?

Ive resisted thus far
hi_im_sean is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:05 PM
  #23544  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,033
Total Cats: 324
Default

Originally Posted by hi_im_sean
speaking of windows 10, bueno?

Ive resisted thus far
This +1

I'm JUST now about to goto win7, way late to the party

I hear win10 tin = free to those on Win7... Truth?
Girz0r is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:06 PM
  #23545  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

People whose opinions I don't trust seem to like it, but I've personally not played with it.

I finally got annoyed enough to manually removed the stupid "Get Windows 10!" nagware utility thing from my W8.1 work computer today. I got tired of it crashing every time I unlocked the machine
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:13 PM
  #23546  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
I hear win10 tin = free to those on Win7... Truth?
From what I understand its free for a year for people running 7 and 8.1 and then only if you make NO hardware changes to the system. No idea what happens after a year but the doom & gloomers on the intertubes are making dire predictions.
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:30 PM
  #23547  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

I'm holding out for Win9.


But seriously...


Upgrading from the C64 to DOS made sense for a lot of reasons.

Upgrading from DOS to Windows 3.1 made sense when there were applications I wanted to run which were only available on Windows 3.1.

Upgrading from 3.1 to 95 made sense when there were applications I wanted to run which were only available on 95.

Upgrading from 95 to 98 made sense when USB peripherals and hard drives larger than 2.1 GB started becoming mainstream.

Upgrading from 98 to XP made sense when there were applications and peripherals I wanted to use which were only available on XP, in addition to native support for peer networking (a vast improvement from Novell NetWare), USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and other wholesome goodness.

Upgrading from XP to 7 made sense when 64 bit processors and silly amounts of RAM started becoming mainstream.

I'm still waiting for a reason to upgrade to either 8.1 or 10.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:33 PM
  #23548  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I'm holding out for Win9.


But seriously...


Upgrading from the C64 to DOS made sense for a lot of reasons.

Upgrading from DOS to Windows 3.1 made sense when there were applications I wanted to run which were only available on Windows 3.1.

Upgrading from 3.1 to 95 made sense when there were applications I wanted to run which were only available on 95.

Upgrading from 95 to 98 made sense when USB peripherals and hard drives larger than 2.1 GB started becoming mainstream.

Upgrading from 98 to XP made sense when there were applications and peripherals I wanted to use which were only available on XP, in addition to native support for peer networking (a vast improvement from Novell NetWare), USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and other wholesome goodness.

Upgrading from XP to 7 made sense when 64 bit processors and silly amounts of RAM started becoming mainstream.

Upgrading from 7 to 8.1 made sense when touchscreens and lack of keyboards becomes mainstream

I'm still waiting for a reason to upgrade to either 11 or 13.
FTFY
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:34 PM
  #23549  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
W8.1 work computer today.
These exist?!?!?!?!?
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 08:06 PM
  #23550  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
These exist?!?!?!?!?
It was not my choice, my boss made me do it.

He is also the one who put Win10 on his work laptop, a 3rd Generation Lenovo X1 Carbon. Touchscreen interface on the ultraportable 14" seems to make it work well. The Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter/Miracast/Intel WiDi/whatever the **** its called that is baked into Win10 seems to be fairly robust, unlike the previous iterations in Win7/8.1. Memory management and processor use in W10 is said to scale better on "marginal" hardware, even better than W7, but I'll believe that when I see it.

Our full scale deployment of Win 10/Office 365 comes Q1 2016, assuming our testing goes well. I'm neck deep in infrastructure projects right now so I've not had time to really play with the desktop OS stuff.
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 08:42 PM
  #23551  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Win10 is better than 8 or 8.1, but I don't see anything that makes it notably better than Win7.

The hardware change thing is really only if you change the motherboard or CPU -- peripheral changes are fine. If you have your original Win7 key, you can submit it to MS support and get a Win10 key in return, so that would solve that problem.
mgeoffriau is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 08:56 PM
  #23552  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,033
Total Cats: 324
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Our full scale deployment of Win 10/Office 365 comes Q1 2016, assuming our testing goes well. I'm neck deep in infrastructure projects right now so I've not had time to really play with the desktop OS stuff.
Your dept. is very on top of things. I doubt my company will upgrade early 2016

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
Win10 is better than 8 or 8.1, but I don't see anything that makes it notably better than Win7.
DirectX is the only thing for me at this point
Girz0r is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 08:57 PM
  #23553  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

my comp upgraded to win7 just this year lolz
18psi is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 09:21 PM
  #23554  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I'm holding out for Win9.


But seriously...


Upgrading from the C64 to DOS made sense for a lot of reasons.

Upgrading from DOS to Windows 3.1 made sense when there were applications I wanted to run which were only available on Windows 3.1.

(lots of pointless upgrades deleted)
For general-purpose computing I went from DOS 5.0 to Linux 0.98 and never looked back. Just say No to Microsoft.

Mid-2000s I switched to a mac for my general-purpose stuff, because it runs BSD.

--Ian
codrus is online now  
Old 10-14-2015, 10:22 PM
  #23555  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
For general-purpose computing I went from DOS 5.0 to Linux 0.98 and never looked back. Just say No to Microsoft.

Mid-2000s I switched to a mac for my general-purpose stuff, because it runs BSD.

--Ian
I played with Debian and Slackware a good deal in college, before GUIs were the norm. Got reasonably proficient with it (I already knew System V Unix from the "big" computers), but these days I've forgotten most of it.

For me, it's all about application support. To do my job, I need AutoCAD, WireCAD, BlackMagic, Evertz Maestro, Caprica, and a number of other applications which are available only on Windows (and, in some cases, MacOS.) I don't much care for Macs (though I do have one on my desk at work now), and while I'm aware that I could run all this stuff inside a VM under Linux, that seems kind of silly.

I'm not a Windows fanboy, but it happens to be the tool which is most efficient for my needs. And, to be honest, it's gotten pretty darn good since XP. Used to be that the max uptime you ever saw on a Windows machine was a couple of days. Now, although I put my home and office machines to sleep every night, I really can't remember the last time I actually rebooted either of them.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-14-2015, 10:38 PM
  #23556  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
Your dept. is very on top of things. I doubt my company will upgrade early 2016
We only have like 300 users so it's not so insane. This push is actually more due to moving away from Novell and over to Microsoft Active Directory/Domain. Thats right, I'm still in Novell hell.

The internal designation for the conversion is 'Project Visine' because we plan to get the red out

Originally Posted by 18psi
my comp upgraded to win7 just this year lolz
Thats because you work in healthcare
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 03:35 AM
  #23557  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
For me, it's all about application support. To do my job, I need AutoCAD, WireCAD, BlackMagic, Evertz Maestro, Caprica, and a number of other applications which are available only on Windows (and, in some cases, MacOS.) I don't much care for Macs (though I do have one on my desk at work now), and while I'm aware that I could run all this stuff inside a VM under Linux, that seems kind of silly.
One advantage to embedded software development, I suppose. All I need to get my job done is a web browser, email reader, and a bunch of xterms for logging into the build servers.

I first switched to a mac in 2004 when I wanted a laptop that ran Unix and didn't blow chunks. Linux was nearly useless on laptops at the time, but MacOS X is basically NeXTStep, and NeXTStep is BSD running on Mach with a fancy GUI on top. It was stable, understood all the laptop-specific hardware (Linux's main fault at the time) and offered a native bash shell and the other parts of a unix environment.

Unfortunately, recently Apple has been moving further and further away from that happy place. Snow Leopard was about the best it got, Mountain Lion and now Mavericks are significantly less stable. Admittedly some of that is probably due to my employer having gotten large enough that we now have an IT department who loads the macs down with crapware, but I notice some of that instability even on my own personal iMac.

--Ian
codrus is online now  
Old 10-15-2015, 09:24 AM
  #23558  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K

Thats because you work in healthcare
tr00f.org

I was actually quite surprised we're not still using windows 95
18psi is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 09:51 AM
  #23559  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
tr00f.org

I was actually quite surprised we're not still using windows 95
If you work in healthcare, I'm guessing your IT dept was scrambling to upgrade/replace the last of the XP machines because MS was ending support which meant they were no longer going to be compliant with the HIPAA security guidelines.
mgeoffriau is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 09:52 AM
  #23560  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

yep.
it was the fastest migration that ever happened lol
18psi is offline  


Quick Reply: How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.