Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2018, 12:01 PM
  #29661  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Struggling right now...

Found the house of my dreams (city-version.)

https://click.mail.zillow.com/f/a/4e...0lm3nhu1_1pt0h

$625k. 3 car garage. Technically, I can afford it, though it'd be a bit of a stretch.

Don't know what to do...
Tough call...

I've lived by the thought that owning property is preferred over renting/leasing but that's a mindset from being in a place for 5yr at least. If you're planning on moving soon you'll give up 6% in fees and the tendency with companies today is to not pay to relo (unless it's within the same company).

Another thing I followed is to never own the most expensive house on the street/neighborhood. Zillow isn't the best at this but do some work on true comps. With that house (nice house btw), you're paying dearly for someone else's sweat. If you're buying with the intent to flip in a yr or two I doubt you can time the real estate market so you need to be prepared to live with a house worth less in the short term (realtor fees to sell + potential down market at the same time).

With that particular house, and it's underlying age, I'd really look into the basement water control before I sunk that kind of money into it. Nothing helps to drop a house value more than a wet basement that's been "upgraded".

There's something about owning vs paying someone else that satisfies the mind though. Good luck!

Last edited by bahurd; 07-27-2018 at 12:23 PM.
bahurd is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 12:13 PM
  #29662  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Agreed. But trivial little **** like that is easily fixed, and totally insignificant as compared to a lot wide enough to host a 3 car garage. Most lots in this area are only 25' wide.
Oh definitely not a deal breaker, it was really the only thing I could nitpick because everything else about is spot on.

We are trying to get prepared to sell this place in a 1.5-3 years, even though I just bought in September. We are hoping with the rate that homes are being purchased and fixed up and flipped like mine was, we will be able to just sell and break even soon.

Then it's do we stay in OKC, or do we move to Austin where my company just opened a massive new "hub/campus."
z31maniac is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 02:26 PM
  #29663  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
I've lived by the thought that owning property is preferred over renting/leasing but that's a mindset from being in a place for 5yr at least. If you're planning on moving soon you'll give up 6% in fees
That is precisely what's kept me a renter since I sold my house in Cincinnati and moved to San Diego in 2004. Lack of a feeling of job security. And, to be fair, since then I've moved:
  • From San Diego to North Carolina
  • From North Carolina to Florida
  • From Florida to San Diego
  • From San Diego to Santa Clara
  • From Santa Clara to Hoboken, NJ
  • From Hoboken to Poughkeepsie
  • From Poughkeepsie to Manhattan
  • From Manhattan to Chicago
  • From Chicago to North Carolina, and
  • From North Carolina to Chicago.
Now, a few of those moves could have been avoided. But it's been a long time since I really felt "planted" in any one job.

Lately, I've been feeling like I might be stuck in Chicago. But a part of me wonders if my feeling "stuck" is what normal (non-nomadic) people interpret as feeling "secure."



With that particular house, and it's underlying age, I'd really look into the basement water control before I sunk that kind of money into it. Nothing helps to drop a house value more than a wet basement that's been "upgraded".
That's just a fact of life in major cities. Homes newer than 75-100 years are rare, and quite expensive.




There's something about owning vs paying someone else that satisfies the mind though. Good luck!
Well, with a property in this price range, the first many years would have me paying in interest more than I pay in rent now. So there's that.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 02:59 PM
  #29664  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
It's only a few blocks from where I live now.

I think you may need to adjust your perception what what a "slightly working class area" area looks like. By Chicago standards, this is one of the more yuppie neighborhoods.
warning: yuppies dont exist anymore. now they're poor millenials.

I saw a lot of 20 year old trucks and vans. Maybe that's just Chi-town.
y8s is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 03:14 PM
  #29665  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
I saw a lot of 20 year old trucks and vans. Maybe that's just Chi-town.
Pretty much.

Seriously, I know this neighborhood well. It's a few blocks from where I live. Unless you're down in River North, this is as upscale as it gets.

I'm more worried about the fact that the housing market in California is looking a tad iffy again, and we know how that turned out the last time. I lost upwards of $100k (actual cash, not fictitious equity) in '08, and am terrified of making a similar mistake.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 04:06 PM
  #29666  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
That's just a fact of life in major cities. Homes newer than 75-100 years are rare, and quite expensive.
IIRC, Zillow put the structure "age" at 1898 which means old shitty foundation and **** poor drainage especially in those heavy rain periods you may find. Couple that with really bad storm drain problems most mid-western city have and you would be looking at a pretty substantial repair bill to repair a wet basement. That would significantly reduce the "value". Overall the house looks really well done but my yankee practicality tells me to discount anything below grade as when it happens not if it happens.

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I'm more worried about the fact that the housing market in California is looking a tad iffy again, and we know how that turned out the last time. I lost upwards of $100k (actual cash, not fictitious equity) in '08, and am terrified of making a similar mistake.
Feel your pain although I've never lost real money on property. The recent news about CA really stemmed from the fact the new inventory has been sold off and there isn't enough new stock to make up for it (if I remember the stats). Housing downturns do seem to happen more frequently then when I got into the market. Sucks to be underwater and owe the bank.
bahurd is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 04:55 PM
  #29667  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
^^ Flashing improperly installed.
correct.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 05:31 PM
  #29668  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
IIRC, Zillow put the structure "age" at 1898 which means old shitty foundation and **** poor drainage especially in those heavy rain periods you may find.
That's just how things are around here. Any single-family home built after World War I is considered "New Construction." (The high-rise condos by the lake are a different universe altogether.)

Chicago is an old city. Hundred year old foundations are considered normal.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:06 PM
  #29669  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Chicago is an old city. Hundred year old foundations are considered normal.
I get that... movin on.

Last edited by bahurd; 07-27-2018 at 07:27 PM.
bahurd is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:53 PM
  #29670  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Chicago is an old city. Hundred year old foundations are considered normal.
It's kind of funny how Americans think a hundred years counts as "old".

--Ian
codrus is online now  
Old 07-27-2018, 10:34 PM
  #29671  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
It's kind of funny how Americans think a hundred years counts as "old".
While having spent some time living in Germany makes me agree, I fully appreciate why this is so, given the relative youth of the country as a whole.

I expect that it is much the same in Canada and Australia.


Unrelated: I made some poor decisions today. Nothing that affects my finances, but my stomach is in full revolt right now.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 07:08 AM
  #29672  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

Gas station sushi is never a good idea.
rleete is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 09:40 AM
  #29673  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

The math just isn't adding up here...

Assuming a $625k purchase price, a 20% downpayment, and ignoring closing costs, I'd be paying approximately $2,800 a month just in interest and property tax alone. That's $1,000 more than I pay in rent at present.

So the question becomes: Do I expect this property to appreciate in value by more than $1,000 per month?

The real-estate market in this area is so unpredictable that I really can't answer that question.





Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-28-2018, 09:49 AM
  #29674  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Enginerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,451
Total Cats: 77
Default

I think you’re missing the qualitative aspect. Property taxes give you so many benefits, like paying public servants from a few decades ago.
Enginerd is offline  
Old 07-29-2018, 08:59 AM
  #29675  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Godless Commie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
The math just isn't adding up here...

Assuming a $625k purchase price, a 20% downpayment, and ignoring closing costs, I'd be paying approximately $2,800 a month just in interest and property tax alone. That's $1,000 more than I pay in rent at present.

So the question becomes: Do I expect this property to appreciate in value by more than $1,000 per month?

The real-estate market in this area is so unpredictable that I really can't answer that question.





I may be mistaken, but when you pay rent, you just pay it away to someone.
Home payments, on the other hand are largely a tax write off.
You get to deduct all interest at the end of the year, and actually come ahead - depending on the specifics of the region, etc.
And, since interest makes up of about 90-95% of your total house payments in the first half of your loan's life, you pretty much enjoy the house and the financial benefits.
Bu the time the principal starts making up the majority of your payments - meaning, there is little to deduct - inflation will have caught up already, and you will end up paying less than those around you who are renting.

Or, I could be wrong.
Godless Commie is offline  
Old 07-29-2018, 11:46 AM
  #29676  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by Godless Commie
I may be mistaken, but when you pay rent, you just pay it away to someone.
Home payments, on the other hand are largely a tax write off.
You get to deduct all interest at the end of the year, and actually come ahead - depending on the specifics of the region, etc.
And, since interest makes up of about 90-95% of your total house payments in the first half of your loan's life, you pretty much enjoy the house and the financial benefits.
Bu the time the principal starts making up the majority of your payments - meaning, there is little to deduct - inflation will have caught up already, and you will end up paying less than those around you who are renting.

Or, I could be wrong.
Property values in this area seem to be relatively stagnant. As an indicator, the apartment on the other side of my building, which is exactly identical to mine, is presently listed for rent at $1,800 per month. That's the same as what I'm paying for my unit, and my lease is up in two months.

And, for me, portability is valuable. As I said, this job feels like one that will be relatively stable, but then, I've moved twelve times in the past 20 years. My Amazon.com addresses page is hilariously long (largely because it also contains a bunch of hotels.)

Real estate tax, state income tax, and mortgage interest are deductible from income when computing Federal tax, as itemized deductions on Schedule A. Since my income tax for IL already puts me very near the minimum Standard Deduction on form 1040, we'll assume that 100% of real estate tax and mortgage interest are deductible. Mortgage interest and real estate tax are not deductible when computing Illinois income tax, so we'll focus just on Federal form 1040.

Assume a $625k purchase price, 20% downpayment, and a 30 year conforming loan at 4.6% APR.

We'll assume that the following things all increase each year at a certain rate, for which I'll have a cell in the spreadsheet called "property inflation" that allows me to plug in different percentages:
  • Market value of home
  • Cost of real-estate tax
  • Cost of rent
My net effective federal tax rate for 2017 (gross income / total tax) was 18.7% So that's the amount by which mortgage interest & property taxes offset my tax burden.

We're also going to explore the opportunity cost of using the downpayment to buy a home vs the average S&P 500 composite return, which is about 6.5% over any period of the past 10, 20, 30 or 40 years. (Range = 6.45 to 6.76)

And, in the end, we'll have to factor in a realtor's commission, which is generally 6%.

I'm gonna make a spreadsheet. Because that's what engineers do.




In the end, it's all coming down to cell B37. Making a 1% adjustment in that cell swings the break-even point by five years in either direction. And, of course, I'm completely ignoring the costs of maintenance.



Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-29-2018, 11:57 AM
  #29677  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez


In the end, it's all coming down to cell B37. Making a 1% adjustment in that cell swings the break-even point by five years in either direction. And, of course, I'm completely ignoring the costs of maintenance.
5 years for breakeven on buying vs renting is actually the rule of thumb I've heard for a long time.

How close to each other in functionality (size, quality, location, etc) are the two properties you're comparing?

--Ian
codrus is online now  
Old 07-29-2018, 12:05 PM
  #29678  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,019
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
How close to each other in functionality (size, quality, location, etc) are the two properties you're comparing?
Size = 3x (which I don't need.)

Quality = 1.25x (one block in from the nearest major road, so slightly better quality of sleep due to noise.)

Location = -0.2x (same neighborhood quality, somewhat longer walk to work.)
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 07-29-2018, 12:18 PM
  #29679  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Size = 3x (which I don't need.)

Quality = 1.25x (one block in from the nearest major road, so slightly better quality of sleep due to noise.)

Location = -0.2x (same neighborhood quality, somewhat longer walk to work.)
When you really want to own that Tesla S but currently lease a Kia Rio it's hard to justify on a spreadsheet....
bahurd is offline  
Old 07-29-2018, 12:30 PM
  #29680  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Size = 3x (which I don't need.)

Quality = 1.25x (one block in from the nearest major road, so slightly better quality of sleep due to noise.)

Location = -0.2x (same neighborhood quality, somewhat longer walk to work.)
Ah, so you're comparing renting an apartment vs buying a single-family house?

Can you buy a condo that's more equivalent? Seems silly to pay for the house if you don't need/want the space.

--Ian
codrus is online now  


Quick Reply: How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.