IIT: An import decision must be made...
|
First ones
|
Both pair make me want to puke.:td:
|
Second ones. Light shoes always end up looking like shit. I just don't have the time to constantly be cleaning my footwear.
|
Originally Posted by Milton Tucker
(Post 577914)
Both pair make me want to puke.:td:
http://www.zappos.com/images/z/8/6/3...MULTIVIEW.jpg? better? they are embroidered with the text: Retail Therapy on the heel, how cute! |
Both look kinda gay, but I'd always get the darker shoes. I don't think I've ever worn non black shoes in my life now that I think of it lol
|
I always white 80's retro running shoes and black socks, these are a drastic change from the norm.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 577916)
http://www.zappos.com/images/z/8/6/3...MULTIVIEW.jpg?
better? they are embroidered with the text: Retail Therapy on the heel, how cute! :idea: |
|
Thread title translates to: In Irrelevant Thread we make decisions on imports.
|
|
I'd say first pair.
I wonder if these come in NA. http://rlv.zcache.com/nc_miata_shoes...8at0dj_400.jpg |
i wonder how many hours a day brainy plays with Nike ID
|
Which is cheaper Scott?
|
Since we own Japanese cars, I believe these are appropriate:
http://dontdatethatdude.files.wordpr...feet-old-7.jpg |
I'd say go with the first ones...
|
I'd take the darker ones; don't usually like light colored shoes, as already explained by others.
The classic 80s white shoe was, of course, the Reebok BB4600. You can still buy them today: http://www.zappos.com/images/113/113...4-27157-p.jpg? |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 577966)
Which is cheaper Scott?
but I have to scour the net for a cheaper price on both. |
both are gay
|
first
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands