Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Is lcd or plasma beter on the electric bill?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #1  
magnamx-5's Avatar
Thread Starter
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default Is lcd or plasma beter on the electric bill?

So i know there are several home entertainment guru's on here. Wich is better in the 50 inch or so size range as far as overall performance and energy usage? And wich do you guys think would last longer before screenburn or dead pixels become an issue?
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

plasma should cost less to operate, life expectancy is comperable. if you're mounting into wood, get whatever you think looks best and is on sale. if you're mounting into steel, get an lcd.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #3  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

plasma is wayyy higher. Ill double check though
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
SamS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
From: Wisconsin
Default

When my parents got their plasma (42" Panasonic for $900, yay for my sis being the Art Director at Best Buy corporate :gay they told us that after a month or so break-in, you should get the tv professionally calibrated. They adjust brightness, contrast etc for a better picture and it uses around half the power of an uncalibrated tv. Only a few Best Buys are offering this service at the moment, but I'm sure you can find someone else to do it.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
dedoky's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 67
Total Cats: 0
From: Windsor, Ont
Default

I'd get an LCD. I picked up a Panasonic Viera and kind of regret it now. I'm into gaming and cant play for more than a couple hours, and even then I get some nice ghosting. Picture is freakin sweet tho
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:52 PM
  #6  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by Loki047
plasma is wayyy higher. Ill double check though
no. peak consumption is higher, but average consumption ("real world use") will be lower.

sam, don't drink the kool aid dude.

Ben
<-- ISF/sencore trained
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #7  
SamS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
From: Wisconsin
Default

But the Best Buy tv specialist was really sharp! I mean, he was like 18, but i think most of those years were spent in front of a tv. They probably wouldn't have hired him if he wasn't an expert on their products, right?
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #8  
carlb's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 72
Total Cats: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Life expectancy is a wash unless you're a gamer. Then you have no real choice. You should go with an LCD. I just bought the Samsung LN-T4661F which gets top scores on CNET.com and Consumer Reports. It's awesome and beats my Sony rear projection hands down.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:10 PM
  #9  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

I've got a Sharp Aquos LC46D92U. It makes my pants feel funny when I watch it. I've got no complaints about it at all, just wish there were more HD programming.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #10  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

"For somewhat lower electric bills. LCDs tend to use less power than comparably sized plasma TVs. It doesn't appear that the differences would affect your electric bills by more than a few dollars a month in many cases, so that might not be a major factor in your decision. But there is obviously an environmental advantage to using a less power-hungry TV." - Consumer Reports

I haven't seen data either way, but so far its the only source I found.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #11  
nicacus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC UT
Default

if you want a killer TV.....
http://www.nuvision.com/tv/52LEDLP/

Nuvision is the ****
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #12  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

the backlit technologies (projection, LCD) all keep the backlight on all the time and will use more energy while the set is on. emissive displays like oled and plasma wont use as much when the screen is black.

however
the avg CRT is still more energy efficient than all of the above. the distinction you want to be aware of is how efficient per square inch of display area. That's where CRT's can't even compete.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #13  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

You wont notice a difference. Trust me. As for life expectancy? Dont worry about that, you will get a new TV before that ever becomes an issue.

Get whatever looks good to you.

How much you wanna spend anyway?
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 05:43 AM
  #14  
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Loki047
"For somewhat lower electric bills. LCDs tend to use less power than comparably sized plasma TVs. It doesn't appear that the differences would affect your electric bills by more than a few dollars a month in many cases, so that might not be a major factor in your decision. But there is obviously an environmental advantage to using a less power-hungry TV." - Consumer Reports

I haven't seen data either way, but so far its the only source I found.
Quoting consumer reports...I thought better of you.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:12 AM
  #15  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Haha, considering I don't have any data, nor does anyone else. I quoted the most reputable source I could find.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:21 AM
  #16  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by jayc72
I've got a Sharp Aquos LC46D92U. It makes my pants feel funny when I watch it. I've got no complaints about it at all, just wish there were more HD programming.
Jay--can you get DirecTV where you live? They have a ****-ton of HD channels.


Originally Posted by Atlanta93LE
Quoting consumer reports...I thought better of you.
Yeah... this thread ain't exactly full of pearls of wisdom...

Loki--the data's out there. I'm just too lazy to dig it up. It was a hot topic a couple years ago. And anyone who really cares can always go to BestBuy with a Kill-A-Watt. But, anyone who's basing their purchasing decision on which display will cost $.50/month less to run probably shouldn't be in the market for a large hd display anyway. Like those guys who won't buy a new MB because they take premium fuel.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.

Last edited by Ben; Oct 23, 2007 at 09:43 AM.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #17  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Jay--can you get DirecTV where you live? They have a ****-ton of HD channels.
Unless he lives in a City with weather. Between the wind/rain dishes aren't that reliable.

PS. Im also too lazy to look it up.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #18  
Philip's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,270
Total Cats: -4
Default

DTV will have 100 HD channels by jan, they have about 60 now, but please, give me dish with their 10 or w/e they have
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #19  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by Loki047
Unless he lives in a City with weather. Between the wind/rain dishes aren't that reliable.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #20  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Loki047
Unless he lives in a City with weather. Between the wind/rain dishes aren't that reliable.

PS. Im also too lazy to look it up.
I've got a 20" dish and have no trouble at all. Very rarely if the weather is just right I'll get some breakup but it has to be raining very hard. I've had the dish full of snow and still get decent signal strength.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.