The new hot swap?
06-27-2013, 02:15 PM
#21
Even with safe search off I still can't see ****, and for that reason im forced to use bing image search.
Also, the chevy V6 may work better for swaps then the ford b/c it looks to be a OHV design, whereas im guessing the ford is a overhead cam engine, and thus wider and taller then the gm 4.6.
Also, the chevy V6 may work better for swaps then the ford b/c it looks to be a OHV design, whereas im guessing the ford is a overhead cam engine, and thus wider and taller then the gm 4.6.
Reply
0
0
06-27-2013, 03:25 PM
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mass.
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 43
Even with safe search off I still can't see ****, and for that reason im forced to use bing image search.
Also, the chevy V6 may work better for swaps then the ford b/c it looks to be a OHV design, whereas im guessing the ford is a overhead cam engine, and thus wider and taller then the gm 4.6.
Also, the chevy V6 may work better for swaps then the ford b/c it looks to be a OHV design, whereas im guessing the ford is a overhead cam engine, and thus wider and taller then the gm 4.6.
Reply
0
0
06-28-2013, 12:50 AM
#33
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Might as well build a tube frame car with a fiberglass body?
Naw... Id rather bolt a transmission on and hack up a subframe, lol
Im really amazed nobody has tried it yet. If I ever get another Miata I think I would seriously consider it.
Not sure what the oil pan situation is like though.
Naw... Id rather bolt a transmission on and hack up a subframe, lol
Im really amazed nobody has tried it yet. If I ever get another Miata I think I would seriously consider it.
Not sure what the oil pan situation is like though.
Reply
0
0
06-28-2013, 01:04 AM
#35
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
LOL @ guys comparing the new 4.3 V6 with the one in the old S-10's. Not even in the same realm guys. The new 4.3 would really be a sweet, sweet motor, and it's going to make an awesome base engine in the pickups that will put the DOHC mills from Ford and Ram to shame.
Not hangin' on GM's ***** here but it's really impressive what they've done with that motor.
Not hangin' on GM's ***** here but it's really impressive what they've done with that motor.
Reply
0
0
06-28-2013, 03:27 AM
#37
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
The 4.3 makes 285 HP and 305 lb ft. Check the power @ rpm and torque vs. HP numbers and tell me which one is the best truck engine.
Reply
0
0
06-28-2013, 11:13 AM
#39
Forget the V6's, the 2.0L ecoboost 4 cyl is more compact, idk what type of engine management you'd use for a direct injection engine.
From wikipedia:
From wikipedia:
A 2.0 L version was first seen in the 2008 Ford Explorer America Concept.[4] The engine was rated at 275 hp (205 kW; 279 PS) and 280 lb·ft (380 N·m).
It is the first EcoBoost engine to include Twin-Independent Variable Cam Timing (Ti-VCT), with advertised 10–20% better fuel economy while maintaining the performance of 3.0-liter V6 engines.[20][21]
Specifications[edit]
Type-Turbocharged, direct petrol injected inline four cylinder engine with Twin independent Variable Camshaft Timing
Displacement-1,999 cc (2 L; 122 cu in)More Details
Type
Turbocharged, direct petrol injected inline four cylinder engine with Twin independent Variable Camshaft Timing
Displacement
1,999 cc (2 L; 122 cu in)
Bore
87.5 mm (3.4 in)
Stroke
83.1 mm (3.3 in)
Compression ratio: 10.0:1
Valve gear: DOHC with 4 valves per cylinder, twin independent variable cam timing
Cylinder head: DOHC Gravity die cast aluminium alloy with sintered valve guides and seats
Cylinder block: High pressure die casting aluminium alloy with bed plate
Camshaft drive: Single chain
Crankshaft: Cast iron with 47mm-diameter crankpins, eight counterweights, five 52mm-diameter main bearings and damped front pulley
Engine management: Bosch MED17 with CAN-Bus and individual knock control
Fuel injection: High pressure fuel direct injection with 7-hole injectors
Turbocharger: Borg Warner K03 low inertia integrated turbo system
It is the first EcoBoost engine to include Twin-Independent Variable Cam Timing (Ti-VCT), with advertised 10–20% better fuel economy while maintaining the performance of 3.0-liter V6 engines.[20][21]
Specifications[edit]
Type-Turbocharged, direct petrol injected inline four cylinder engine with Twin independent Variable Camshaft Timing
Displacement-1,999 cc (2 L; 122 cu in)More Details
Type
Turbocharged, direct petrol injected inline four cylinder engine with Twin independent Variable Camshaft Timing
Displacement
1,999 cc (2 L; 122 cu in)
Bore
87.5 mm (3.4 in)
Stroke
83.1 mm (3.3 in)
Compression ratio: 10.0:1
Valve gear: DOHC with 4 valves per cylinder, twin independent variable cam timing
Cylinder head: DOHC Gravity die cast aluminium alloy with sintered valve guides and seats
Cylinder block: High pressure die casting aluminium alloy with bed plate
Camshaft drive: Single chain
Crankshaft: Cast iron with 47mm-diameter crankpins, eight counterweights, five 52mm-diameter main bearings and damped front pulley
Engine management: Bosch MED17 with CAN-Bus and individual knock control
Fuel injection: High pressure fuel direct injection with 7-hole injectors
Turbocharger: Borg Warner K03 low inertia integrated turbo system
Reply
0
0
06-28-2013, 01:29 PM
#40
Steps for best Miata swap:
1) remove truck engine.
2) modify subframe.
3) install truck engine.
But seriously, you guys are thinking too big. I'd go with the 3-cyl 1L ecoboost. With a larger turbo from the 1.6 version, it made 200hp in the formula ford they put it in. They are coming to the US in 2014 supposedly.
1) remove truck engine.
2) modify subframe.
3) install truck engine.
But seriously, you guys are thinking too big. I'd go with the 3-cyl 1L ecoboost. With a larger turbo from the 1.6 version, it made 200hp in the formula ford they put it in. They are coming to the US in 2014 supposedly.
Reply
0
0
