Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Turbos and MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #1  
nicacus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC UT
Default Turbos and MPG

This discussion is from a local Mazda forum I grace with my presence every now and then..
My posts are in red.

Does anything this guy is saying make sense to anyone?
to keep my car at 0 on the boost gauge you would have to be slightly accelerating at all times.. And it seems to me, that the more vacuum the motor is creating the less effort the engine is putting forth, less exhuast = less spool right?
Am I correct in thinking this or should I just shutup?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arashi_nero
when you're on the highway, it's not that hard. the best place to have your turbo is at 0 (no vac and no boost), supposedly that's where you get the best gas mileage with a turbo.




Physics Injection: with turbocharged vehicles and gas mileage, the engine will compensate for the increased air being compressed into the engine with more fuel. Your ecu is constantly trying to maintain the perfect air/fuel ratio (i think its 11:1 but i may be wrong). So if your turbo is spooling, you are throwing more air in, and hence more fuel being dumped in to compensate.

Simple equation:
Less air in aka. less boost
MPG > Boost
More air in aka. more boost
MPG < Boost

Quote:
Originally Posted by kibert
Weird I've always thought you got the best MPG with more vacuum, that way the engine is working to spool the turbo.. I'll have to research that.

Due to simple combustion engine mechanics, the more work an engine has to do, the more fuel it needs to complete the task. Having increased vacuum means that the engine is working more.
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

More vacuum = less air

Less air = less fuel
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #3  
nicacus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC UT
Default

ding ding ding..
I dont see why that's so hard to accept
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
TrickerZ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 856
Total Cats: 21
From: Cocoa Beach, FL
Default

it depends on AFR, vac, and RPM. All the turbo does is add parasitic back pressure. 0 will not keep accelerating your car, at some point the drag will equal the acceleration and cancel it out.
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

That happens around 100-110mph.

Not that I've tested that or anything.
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #6  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by TrickerZ
...at some point the drag will equal the acceleration and cancel it out.
And at that point, I'm sure you'll be getting stellar MPG...
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:39 PM
  #7  
ismael_pt's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
From: Granada, Spain
Default

Originally Posted by TrickerZ
it depends on AFR, vac, and RPM. All the turbo does is add parasitic back pressure. 0 will not keep accelerating your car, at some point the drag will equal the acceleration and cancel it out.
+1 but 0 vs. drag end nearby 120 mph. +-15 inHg enough to cruise in the 1.8, looking at the boost/vacuum gauge can know if it suits to downshift on a hill climb for better MPG
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.