Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

V12 LSx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2013 | 12:21 AM
  #1  
Opti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 625
Total Cats: 22
From: DF-DUB
Default V12 LSx

So some guy on tech is building LSx based V12s. Im still reading the thread, but apparently he is pretty much cutting up two and welding them together. Makes there own crank and cam in house. Said they have already completed a few. Next one is going into a 240z, also its getting a Maggie.

Still reading the thread but thought it might arouse some of you as much as it does me.

Link to the thread here. Dont know how much isnt visible when you aren't a member.
V12 LS1 Build - LS1TECH

Between this and the flat plane crank LSx, they are doin some crazy **** with these LSxs.

Im curious about how smooth it will be with the way the crank is built, but he said the first one that went into the suburban did 525hp on all stock LS1 parts, so it cant be too bad.










Also for all the gays on here. V4.
Attached Thumbnails V12 LSx-401010d1367455787-v12-ls1-build-block.jpg   V12 LSx-401011d1367456138-v12-ls1-build-cut-half-heads.jpg   V12 LSx-401012d1367456290-v12-ls1-build-cranks.jpg   V12 LSx-401013d1367456454-v12-ls1-build-camshaft.jpg   V12 LSx-ellz3qt.jpg  

V12 LSx-gyie2xb.jpg   V12 LSx-q1sgqij.jpg  
Old May 10, 2013 | 12:27 AM
  #2  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Quite some crazy machining...
Old May 10, 2013 | 12:50 AM
  #3  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

****
Old May 10, 2013 | 01:07 AM
  #4  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Opti
Old May 10, 2013 | 01:42 AM
  #5  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

I call BS... It's clearly Shopped!
Old May 10, 2013 | 01:59 AM
  #6  
Sclippy96's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 73
Total Cats: 3
Default

I can't wait to see what the V12 sounds like running. For every V12 they make, there will be the leftover parts for a V4. Count me in for a half an LS7, 3.5L V4.

Attached Thumbnails V12 LSx-401162d1367604839-v12-ls1-build-photo-6-.jpg  
Old May 10, 2013 | 05:07 AM
  #7  
Erat's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,717
Total Cats: 830
From: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Default

Soooo, he just "welds them together" and it's all good??

According to him, he just welds inside and out. Seems impossible to me, but what do i know.
Old May 10, 2013 | 08:25 AM
  #8  
Nagase's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,805
Total Cats: 2
Default

Oh dear god, a v4 would be amazing. Do want.
Old May 10, 2013 | 09:24 AM
  #9  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,182
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
Soooo, he just "welds them together" and it's all good??

According to him, he just welds inside and out. Seems impossible to me, but what do i know.
That was my first thought.
Old May 10, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #10  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Nagase
Oh dear god, a v4 would be amazing. Do want.
Didn't we just have this conversation in another thread?

Admittedly, a 3.5l engine is tempting, but the V4 design has certain inherent... disadvantages. (IOW, there's a reason nobody makes them anymore outside of a couple of wacky motorcycle apps.)
Old May 10, 2013 | 09:54 AM
  #11  
Nagase's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,805
Total Cats: 2
Default

Not sure what thread you mean.

And yeah. A v4 would be a bit much.

I'd really like their GM's 4.3 V6 to be every bit the LSx, just smaller. Anything shorter/lower/further back/lighter than the stock iron four would be interesting.
Old May 10, 2013 | 12:55 PM
  #12  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

<This guy doesn't know nuthin' 'bout nuthin' but would be very concerned about harmonics and pulse timing. Crankshafts are typically designed to alternate impulses for inherent smoothness. If the V4 runs rough then the v4 on the front of a V8 will also be rough if still using the V8 rhythm. To say it another way, a v12 built correctly will have a different pulse rhythm than a V8 with a half V8 welded to it. A proper v12 engine is an I6 engine times two. An inline six is inherently smooth. From Wiki:
An inline six engine is in perfect primary and secondary mechanical balance, without the use of a balance shaft. The engine is in primary couple balance because the front and rear trio of cylinders are mirror images, and the pistons move in pairs (but of course, 360° out of phase and on different strokes of the 4-stroke cycle). That is, piston #1 mirrors #6, #2 mirrors #5, and #3 mirrors #4, largely eliminating the polar rocking motion that would otherwise result. Secondary imbalance is avoided because the crankshaft has six crank throws arranged in three planes offset at 120°. The result is that the secondary forces that are caused by differences from purely sinusoidal motion sum to zero.

An inline four cylinder or V6 engine without a balance shaft will experience secondary dynamic imbalance, resulting in engine vibration. As a general rule, the forces arising from any dynamic imbalance increase as the square of the engine speed — for example, if the speed doubles, vibration will increase by a factor of four. In contrast, inline six engines have no primary or secondary imbalances, and with carefully designed crankshaft vibration dampers to absorb torsional vibration, will run more smoothly at the same crankshaft speed (rpm). As engine reciprocating forces increase with the cube of piston bore, straight-six is a preferred configuration for large truck engines.
A V8 plus a half V8 doesn't have this inherent balance designed into it unless you redesign the crank throws entirely by building a new crankshaft. Additionally, the 90 degree vee design is significantly less desirable for a 12 cylinder engine than a 60 degree design from an engineering dynamics standpoint. See this very interesting article (warning: DeLorean Content).
Drawing from the article:


It's not up to OEM standards, but from a "backyard Bubba" angle, it's pretty darn cool.
Old May 10, 2013 | 02:09 PM
  #13  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default


Old May 10, 2013 | 02:20 PM
  #14  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Opti
Also for all the gays on here. V4.
+1 for flawless trolling.
Old May 10, 2013 | 06:35 PM
  #15  
TalkingPie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 58
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Didn't we just have this conversation in another thread?

Admittedly, a 3.5l engine is tempting, but the V4 design has certain inherent... disadvantages. (IOW, there's a reason nobody makes them anymore outside of a couple of wacky motorcycle apps.)
For what it's worth, I loved my "wacky motorcycle" with V4. I'm not saying it's necessarily a great idea - the additional head and associated parts alone are a hurdle in the case of DOHC - but the powerband was great and the engine note was fantastic. And that was in an otherwise fairly vanilla (but excellent) bike, a VFR800.
Old May 10, 2013 | 08:15 PM
  #16  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,182
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Crank Harmonics, and engine smoothness
That was my second thought.


You'd think with all those fab tools they could just have spec'd a new crank, to take advantage of the I6/V12 running order.
Old May 10, 2013 | 08:17 PM
  #17  
Pinky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 660
Total Cats: 216
From: Jacksonville FL
Default

I had a Saab Sonnet with a V4.. Wacky little car but surprisingly quick. Of course it only weighed like fifteen pounds, so a Briggs and Stratton lawnmower engine probably would have been adequate.
Old May 10, 2013 | 09:49 PM
  #18  
Sclippy96's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 73
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndGearRubber
That was my second thought.


You'd think with all those fab tools they could just have spec'd a new crank, to take advantage of the I6/V12 running order.
It sounds like they did exactly that for the LSx V12 that they made for the P-51 race plane, a custom billet crank was made.
Old May 10, 2013 | 10:00 PM
  #19  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

why are we all talking like they aren't making their own crank?

Dann
Old May 10, 2013 | 10:04 PM
  #20  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
why are we all talking like they aren't making their own crank?
Because they said they're cutting two cranks apart and welding them?


Serious question:

At this point, why wouldn't you just use an SLA machine to print a wax positive of the engine, and use that to create a completely new investment-cast block and heads (which obey OEM conventions for all the major dimensions and accessory mounts), as opposed to using a bandsaw and welder?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.