Who knows anything about the law?
I've been posting on some law help sites and whatnot, but I thought that I may as well post here because A. as some people may be able to give advice, and B. I'll get some more amusing answers here. And now my generic post.
I am a minor in California, and I got a ticket for what the cop called racing on a local canyon road back in February. I am at a loss as to what to do as so many people have been telling me so many different things. First of all, I want to say not guilty, because it was in no way a race. I was on the road following my friend up to the point at which the cop was watching. We were admitably speeding, although the cop did not use radar and didn't say how fast I was going. We were not overtaking each other, we were not driving on the other side of the road, we were not tailgating each other, we had no intent of overtaking each other, and knew perfectly well who was going to get to the top first, we were just driving up fast in our lane. I am not sure how much of an argument I will have in juvenile court because from what I have heard the judge really doesn't listen to you without a lawyer. I do not have a lawyer, although I tried to get one. My parents feel that a lawyer isn't needed, and do not want to pay the money for one due to our financial situation. Here is more of the dilemma, my parents are saying that I should just plead guilty to try and make the court see how cooperative I am being, and to not stir up more trouble, but at the same time, I honestly wasn't racing, and want to argue my case. And yet another thing I heard about doing was transferring the case to a different court where they have a history of being more lenient, but again, I have no clue on how to do this. Any help would be much appreciated for my fast approaching court date. |
If you were not racing, then plead not guilty. Tell the judge your story. Sounds like reckless driving to me. I've been in court several times over stuff like this. I happen to know a lawyer, so I consulted him a few times, but never had him in court to represent me. You may want to talk to one, and get their advice.
For example, I got arrested for illegal equipment, having nitrous in my caravan. Well, I thought it wasn't illegal, but couldn't find anything that said it wasn't. So, I talk to my lawyer and he shows me all the laws and statutes and after a few minutes of research, we find 'illegal equipment' and print those pages. He reads through it, and there is no mention of nitrous. Brought the papers to court and plead not guilty. Judge looked at me and said are you saying you didn't have nitrous? I'm looking at the pictures the officer took. I said no sir, but nitrous is not illegal equipment. My lawyer and I can not find a law or statute that say's it is. They search for an hour and then call me back up and said it's not illegal, and tore it up. Moral is, even though I thought/knew it wasn't illegal, I didn't really know how to say it in court. Consulting my lawyer he gave me the advise I needed to win my case. |
Well damn, now I just need to make friends with a lawyer... real quick.
Thanks for the advice though, there are plenty around here in Malibu, I'll see if I know someone who knows someone. |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 243392)
If you were not racing, then plead not guilty. Tell the judge your story. Sounds like reckless driving to me. I've been in court several times over stuff like this. I happen to know a lawyer, so I consulted him a few times, but never had him in court to represent me. You may want to talk to one, and get their advice.
For example, I got arrested for illegal equipment, having nitrous in my caravan. Well, I thought it wasn't illegal, but couldn't find anything that said it wasn't. So, I talk to my lawyer and he shows me all the laws and statutes and after a few minutes of research, we find 'illegal equipment' and print those pages. He reads through it, and there is no mention of nitrous. Brought the papers to court and plead not guilty. Judge looked at me and said are you saying you didn't have nitrous? I'm looking at the pictures the officer took. I said no sir, but nitrous is not illegal equipment. My lawyer and I can not find a law or statute that say's it is. They search for an hour and then call me back up and said it's not illegal, and tore it up. Moral is, even though I thought/knew it wasn't illegal, I didn't really know how to say it in court. Consulting my lawyer he gave me the advise I needed to win my case. |
Originally Posted by ApexOnYou
(Post 243395)
What! A cop actually gave you a ticket for having nitrous? I totally believe it, but I wouldn't think that there are any laws specifically naming nitrous.
|
Have you talked to the DA yet have you?
Spray is illegal on the road in all states IIRC. |
From what I can tell, no DA because it's a juvenile case, just me and a judge. But I have heard conflicting information about this, but when my parents called the court they said there was no DA, so I am going to assume they were correct.
|
Sounds like a lame situation man, shoulda fucking booked it when you passed that cop. jk
|
Whatever you do, DO NOT PLEAD GUILTY.
What CVC did he write you up for? Have you received your "Courtesy Notice" in the mail yet? What road was it on? How fast were you going? What is the posted speed limit? What were the traffic conditions? What was the weather like? PM me these answers if you don't want to be posting them all here, I'm 19 years old and have be given over 10 tickets but have no points on my record. :-D I can try to help but no guarantees. |
if you stab someone in broad daylight, 50 people see you and the person you stabbed is the judge that's assigned to his own trial and happened to video record it at the same time....you say not guilty.
but alas, it's CA, so time to start pulling the parts off the car that you wanna resell ;) |
I thought they impound and crush your car if your caught "street racing" in Cali.
__________________ Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote |
Originally Posted by levnubhin
(Post 243457)
I thought they impound and crush your car if your caught "street racing" in Cali.
|
CA sux big hairy donky balls and dick
go to court, tell the cop "fuck you" tell the judge "fuck you" and then say for the record "fuck you"... they have no proof of you speeding, you are not guilty, how can he say you racing if you were behind another car not trying to pass it, no proof...DO NOT PLEAD GUILTY or ill stab you in the face with an Ice pick |
Even if your parents won't financially support your decision to retain council, would they permit you to consult with a public defender?
Also, here's a handy reference so you can start doing your homework: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html From CA Vehicle code, chaper 12, article 1: 23109. (a) A person shall not engage in a motor vehicle speed contest on a highway. As used in this section, a motor vehicle speed contest includes a motor vehicle race against another vehicle, a clock, or other timing device. For purposes of this section, an event in which the time to cover a prescribed route of more than 20 miles is measured, but where the vehicle does not exceed the speed limits, is not a speed contest. (b) A person shall not aid or abet in any motor vehicle speed contest on any highway. (c) A person shall not engage in a motor vehicle exhibition of speed on a highway, and a person shall not aid or abet in a motor vehicle exhibition of speed on any highway. |
Would the fact that "racing/competition of speed" is specified on the ticket matter? Or does the 23109 mean that any part of the 23109 can be applying to me, including the speed exhibition part?
And I don't know anything about the public defender thing, but in juvenile court the rights are different, and I don't think you have right to a public attorney, but I'll look into it. |
I would still plead NOT GUILTY. Remember, in court, you DO NOT have to prove your innocence...they have to prove you're guilty. Did you admit to speeding to the cop? Since it seems the cop cannot prove the speeds of either car, he has no proof of racing, he has nothing to show for it in court. Is your 1st court date a trial or arraignment? If it's an arraignment date, then when you plead not guilty a trial date will be set and you should be able to get a public defender via the court. Remember, public defenders DO want to win their case..even though they are court appointed, they will fight for you.
BTW ... fuck CA. |
Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
(Post 243579)
I would still plead NOT GUILTY. Remember, in court, you DO NOT have to prove your innocence...they have to prove you're guilty. Did you admit to speeding to the cop? Since it seems the cop cannot prove the speeds of either car, he has no proof of racing, he has nothing to show for it in court. Is your 1st court date a trial or arraignment? If it's an arraignment date, then when you plead not guilty a trial date will be set and you should be able to get a public defender via the court. Remember, public defenders DO want to win their case..even though they are court appointed, they will fight for you.
BTW ... fuck CA. Always GUILTY and you have to prove your innocence. Yes, it is bassackwards, but that is my experience and the majority experience of what I have read. Even with examples of an officer's perjury on the stand, the accused was still found guilty in some cases. |
i met a lawyer who drives '99 miata w/ all the goodies on it... ill try to find his phone number for you.
|
Originally Posted by reddroptop
(Post 243585)
I have never ever ever heard of a traffic court in North America where this is true.
Always GUILTY and you have to prove your innocence. Yes, it is bassackwards, but that is my experience and the majority experience of what I have read. Even with examples of an officer's perjury on the stand, the accused was still found guilty in some cases. |
Accept responsibility for what you did. If you truely beleive you weren't in the wrong, then fight it. If you are fighting it just to avoid the penalty then you need to think of that everytime you bitch because a cop wasn't there when you needed him.
I've done my fair share of stupidity behind the wheel of a car, and the times I got caught I took it like a man and paid. Shit like that teaches you a lesson. What's the fine and the impact on your insurance if you are found guilty? |
This is America!!!! No one is ever responsible for their own actions, we are always innocent. Isn't it time to pay your Queen tribute?
|
reddroptop-i see why you may think that, but look at it this way...
if a cop has proof (radar, accident report, etc.) you are guilty from the start if the cop has no evidence, why do you need to prove anything? he has no evidence that this kid was speeding/racing...how did he conclude that these two cars were racing? only if they plead guilty... I would still plead not guilty and kinda do what dopplegangerftw says |
The cop has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that you were speeding. With no print out from the radar gun he can't. So use that as your argument. All you have to say is "So, how can you, beyond reasonable doubt, prove that I was speeding?", and when he can't furnish any evidence, you are off the hook. Doppelgänger is correct also with having an arraignment. Plead not guilty, and you should be good to go.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 243607)
This is America!!!! No one is ever responsible for their own actions, we are always innocent. Isn't it time to pay your Queen tribute?
|
nah we are already spread thin, gotta wait it out and find another easy target.
|
Originally Posted by hackerchris
(Post 243620)
The cop has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that you were speeding. With no print out from the radar gun he can't. So use that as your argument. All you have to say is "So, how can you, beyond reasonable doubt, prove that I was speeding?", and when he can't furnish any evidence, you are off the hook. Doppelgänger is correct also with having an arraignment. Plead not guilty, and you should be good to go.
For example I did a burnout in the minivan for about 300 feet. I wasn't speeding (since I had the e-brake applied) and the cop didn't have a radar ticket showing me going 15-20 in a 25. Still, it was careless/reckless driving by definition. I know it, he knows it. Actually, the cop wrote it up as careless since their were no other cars around, and I wasn't actually endangering anyone other than myself. By definition it was careless, but in all honesty it was pretty reckless too. The OP's case sounds reckless to me. Another example: Running a yellow light and it turns red before you clear the intersection is considered careless. Running a red light is considered reckless, at least around here. Running a yellow light is careless because of your bad judgment call. You should have been safe and simply stopped. Running a red light is flat out reckless. You neglected to pay attention, or choose to run the red light, clearly presenting a hazard to other drivers. There was no judgment call made. Wether or not the cop has your speed at the time doesn't matter, he uses his best judgment to decide if you ran the light. He has no physical evidence, but his word holds more water than yours in court. My best advice is plead not guilty, and explain the situation to the judge yourself, letting him know you are sincerely sorry for your naive mistake and this has been a huge wake up call for you. Let him know you made a poor decision that day, and have learned from it and will never put yourself or others in a dangerous situation like that ever again. |
I'm still blown away that patsmx5 had NOS on a minivan. Are you a soccer mom?
|
Originally Posted by jayc72
(Post 243603)
Accept responsibility for what you did. If you truely beleive you weren't in the wrong, then fight it. If you are fighting it just to avoid the penalty then you need to think of that everytime you bitch because a cop wasn't there when you needed him.
I've done my fair share of stupidity behind the wheel of a car, and the times I got caught I took it like a man and paid. Shit like that teaches you a lesson. What's the fine and the impact on your insurance if you are found guilty? Mark |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 243634)
Tell them you were speeding, but were not racing.
hense the not guilty plee. dont tell them anything they dont need to know. you weren't racing so you pleed not guilty. ask to take a $60 defensive deriver class in lieu of the ticket being dropped, should take 30 seconds and they'll push your through the door. here in VA at least :) if you are ever even thinking of pleading guilty, you plead no contest. |
+1 on MarkP's statement. spending $750 on a cheap lawyer will pay for itself 10X fold in the comming years increase in insurance payments. with very few exceptions it is always worth it to spend a little coin and get a cheap/reasonable lawyer. you don't need an expensive bad ass, you just need someone that knows their ass from a hole in the ground.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 243687)
hense the not guilty plee. dont tell them anything they dont need to know. you weren't racing so you pleed not guilty. ask to take a $60 defensive deriver class in lieu of the ticket being dropped, should take 30 seconds and they'll push your through the door. here in VA at least :)
if you are ever even thinking of pleading guilty, you plead no contest. Oh, and here a lawyer will defend a kid for less than 750, 250 would do it. I'm just good friends with a kick-ass lawyer, so I get it for free. I'm actually friends with two lawyers, I recently built a fence for one that lives a few blocks from my house. He said let him know if I ever needed a lawyer and he'd take care of me. :) |
Originally Posted by speedf50
(Post 243568)
Would the fact that "racing/competition of speed" is specified on the ticket matter? Or does the 23109 mean that any part of the 23109 can be applying to me, including the speed exhibition part?
And I don't know anything about the public defender thing, but in juvenile court the rights are different, and I don't think you have right to a public attorney, but I'll look into it.
Originally Posted by hackerchris
The cop has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that you were speeding.
Because of the wording of the law, there is one no specific standard that must be met in order to be guilty. Much like reckless driving, Exhibition and Speed Contests are almost entirely a subjective matter. The officer will describe to the court what behavior he witnessed the defendant exhibit: traveling at a high rate of speed, in an environment conducive to competitive behavior (perhaps noting any previous arrests for similar activities which have occurred on or near the road in question) in the presence of another, presumably modified vehicle operated by an acquaintance of the defendant and also being driven in a similar manner, etc... At that point, the officer has met the standard needed for a conviction. The defendant will then present any evidence or testimony he has to negate the statements of the officer or explain why the behavior that the officer observed was in fact not in violation of 23109. Then the court will then find the defendant guilty. In other words, for an offense such as this, a teenager driving a sports car in the canyons is pretty much boned right from the start. Unless you want to be bumming rides from your friends for a long time, you need professional help. |
I was in traffic court last summer, One of the cases before mine was about a similar scenario. The Kids father was present. (one of the cars ended up off the "traveled portion of the road" I believe the officer cited them w/ racing resulting in an accident.
The Judge asked the father, "Did your son receive any discipline at home as a result of this ticket?" The Father, "Yes we took away his video games for a week, and he was only allowed to drive to school." The Judge replied, "MMM, I'll have to review the case and make my ruling later in the day" The Kid stated one more time he wasn't racing... IIRC, minors can loose their license til they are 21, if the judge finds what the officer cited them for. Next was my turn in front of the judge (I'm a bit older), It was tough to bite my tongue and say something like, "Judge-Please don't take my Video games too"... How did your parents react? |
Well they were understandably pissed. They got the car out of impound early by talking to the sheriff, but that wasn't so I could drive it, but just to avoid the astronomical impound fees. Couldn't drive for 30 days per the aphedavid, but I really need to drive to school seeing how far away it is, so after those 30 days I was commuting again.
There was lots of yelling and bickering, but I got to keep my videogames :D, seeing as I don't play them... And another update, I took some of the advice I got on here (much better advice than what I got on some BS preachy ridiculous law forum) and talked to a lawyer, who I am meeting with along with my parents tomorrow. Hopefully he will be able to steer me in the right direction legally, and maybe even keep my license in my pocket. I definitely feel better doing this than going in blind and just being humble. Also thanks for all of the advice that people have given me on here, seriously it has been a huge help. |
Get a lawyer, they really do work miracles. 500 for the lawyer + fine > points or license suspension.
Otherwise the cop is always right and you are screwed generally in cases like this, its his word against yours and he is always right. |
Whiggity woot! I got a lawyer and had the courtdate, and wow! Thank you so much everyone who recommended to get a lawyer. I got the ticket reduced to a 1 point infraction, and got traffic school for that infraction, so nothing goes on the record! The only downside is that I got 50 hours community service and a 90 day restricted license from the juvenile judge to teach me a lesson, but I can deal with that, and 50 hours of community service kicks the shit out of no license for a year.
I'm pretty much fucking pumped about this result! Even I thought I would get my license suspended, and even more so after reading the police report. Again, thank you to everyone for the legal advice! Miata turbo pretty much saved my ass this time. Too bad this cuts into the boost fund, oh well maybe that should wait a while anyways. |
Glad to hear it worked out for you. It's hard to say what "could have been", but 50 hours & 90 days is pretty much a wrist-slap.
Would you care to share some of the details of the proceeding? |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 243735)
Unless you want to be bumming rides from your friends for a long time, you need professional help.
I have a penchant for getting sued and I don't seem to be very good at preparing defenses for myself even when I'm outrightly innocent. And in my line of work, I see a lot of people brought to the carpet for stuff that is clearly unjust. And whenever I see people prepare their own seemingly logical defenses (or appealing to the court by admitting guilt), they come out with a big sloppy mess. Judges' rulings are rarely logical and never predictable. What am I saying? I've learned the hard way that, although they're expensive, lawyers provide relatively cheap insurance and you will come out ahead with less payout, less lost time and less lost sleep. Glad you got out "cleanly". |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 247065)
Glad to hear it worked out for you. It's hard to say what "could have been", but 50 hours & 90 days is pretty much a wrist-slap.
Would you care to share some of the details of the proceeding? Basically it really payed off that the lawyer had a good relationship with this judge, and knew how to get it reduced to a 1 point, then eliminated by traffic school. Plus for community service I get to go and work at an animal shelter, so maybe I can get some funny cat pictures! |
Originally Posted by speedf50
(Post 247235)
Basically it really payed off that the lawyer had a good relationship with this judge
Regardless of anybody's personal opinions on the idea, such matters are indeed a factor in the modern judicial process, particularly as it relates to administrative hearings or bench trials, where a judge is the sole finder of fact. It is unlikely that Lionel Hutz or The Hyperchicken, for instance, would have curried similar favor. |
I don't know, The Hyperchicken seems pretty good to me.
|
OP: Let me give you some advice. I'm not a cop, I'm not a lawyer, I've never taken any law classes, and am not qualified to give you advice in any way except my past experience with the "Justice" system.
1. NEVER, EVER talk to the police as a defendant or suspect without legal representation. I mean, NEVER. <-- Those exact words are from my lawyers mouth. Since you're under the age of 18, its ILLEGAL for the police to question you in an ongoing investigation without your PARENTAL consent! 2. NEVER admit you did something wrong, if you did or not. 3. Get legal council immediatly. Fighting something like that won't cost you a fortune and will be worth whatever it will cost. Call every lawyer you can find in the yellow pages, most will meet with you for free and any DESCENT person will let you make payments. 4. Do NOT plead guilty to that just to see if you can squeak out through the justice system. The judge will look at the facts; Young kid, sports car, racing, plead guilty. First off a charge like that will likely cause you a great deal of financial burden from the cLAW, loss of driving privileges, driving classes, raised insurance rates. Where I live the maximum punishment for something like that is actually 120 days incarceration, and will go on your record! Good luck, mang.
Originally Posted by miatamania
(Post 243398)
Have you talked to the DA yet have you?
Spray is illegal on the road in all states IIRC. Nitrous is NOT illegal to have installed in a vehicle! If the valve is closed you're straight. If its open, then you're fucked. :jerkit: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands