No one here likes shit like this.
|
He's been here for over 4 years, and has a 1k+ posts. I think he knows what kind of cars are popular here. I believe he was asking for criticism on his photog skills, not whether or not we like the car.
Astro. Not bad at all. A couple of them are really nice. Most are pretty good. If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much. |
What the fuck is a FATLACE?
Nice pics. |
your composition sucks dick. what equipment did you use? I mean, besides the obvious photoshop dickery.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 746006)
No one here likes shit like this.
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
He's been here for over 4 years, and has a 1k+ posts. I think he knows what kind of cars are popular here. I believe he was asking for criticism on his photog skills, not whether or not we like the car.
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
Astro. Not bad at all. A couple of them are really nice. Most are pretty good. If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much.
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 746040)
What the fuck is a FATLACE?
Nice pics. |
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746061)
your composition sucks dick. what equipment did you use? I mean, besides the obvious photoshop dickery.
|
Originally Posted by astroboy
(Post 746066)
So when you say composition sucks dick you mean I didn't adhere to the "rule" of thirds? Camera's a D5000 with a 50 prime and a 18-55
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746067)
The rule of thirds and all those fancy conventions can suck on my dangling down dong. Do you consider yourself an artist? I mean, you do have a Flickr so that's like half the battle, right?
|
Not one of your shots made me think. I'm sorry, I don't have anything to offer other than you hit pretty much every cliche exterior shot possible.
|
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much.
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746086)
Not one of your shots made me think. I'm sorry, I don't have anything to offer other than you hit pretty much every cliche exterior shot possible.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2614/...58c62af7_b.jpg Or is this more your thing? http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1074/...8e2a5e8e_b.jpg |
much better.
|
The panning shot or the high perspective shot?
|
I don't know crap about photography, but they look great to me.
All these "Illest" stickers make me want to look for a "Healthiest" sticker. |
Cant wait for us to shoot my car together so you can teach me more. I dont know shit about my camera.
BTW how the fuck did you get that pic in willi at the bridge? |
One day I'll scan all of my prints and host them somewhere. Real men use film.
|
#9 needs the pole removed...it's horrid on the eye.
#11 needs less DOF/more area in focus. Might be better if the rear tire AND wheel were in focus. To me, the object in focus (the farmost part of the lip) is too narrow and distracting...I can't focus on the picture. But what do i know, I'm not some hotshot picturetakerperson. Composition and quality are pretty good IMHO on the rest (although the subject is a bit bland to my personal taste). Does anyone else think Pusha's lame shit talking is getting old? At least Hussie was creative with his keyboard vomit...and it was witty. |
I like #4 and #6
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746067)
The rule of thirds and all those fancy conventions can suck on my dangling down dong. Do you consider yourself an artist? I mean, you do have a Flickr so that's like half the battle, right?
I think most of them look pretty nice Astro. For shots focusing on the car, it's hard to really do much with them, especially with limited locations and lighting. I think you did a good job overall. Of course there is always improvement, even with very experienced photographers/artists. |
#1 - whatever is going on in the top right of the photo is way too distracting - put the wipers back down and get the person out of the picture.
#2 - There is no content here, nothing inspiring, this pic doesn't do much for me at all. Zooom out so that you can frame the top and bottom of the bumper, and get some taillight in as well. #3 - Turn your CPL so that the windshield glares, if possible. Pics of faces inside the car are distracting from the actual car. Also, if you're going to have the car off center, try to have more space in front of the car instead of behind the car - i.e. "where is it going" or "what's in front of it" - given the rearward angle of the shot, you'll only get to see barely more in front of the car, but this picture will be the car "entering" the photo, and not "exiting" the photo. #4 is strange because vertical lines should be vertical - notice the corner of the building. Yes, sometimes it's impossible, otherwise I would like this shot with a good bit more lighting, and pull some glare out with your CPL. #5 - Bad lighting direction makes the front edges overstated, and the back edges tough to distinguish. #6 - I like this shot, but being that it is still, try to be creative with perspective - take the shot from a perspective that a viewer wouldn't normally get to see. Use the hell out of liveview with that flip out screen - I do. Take a shot with the camera resting on your hands on the ground, Take another shot holding the camera way high in the air. The Live View can be tricky for motion shots because of terrible focusing speeds, but for still stuff like this, it works wonders. #7 - turning the wheel slightly to the right will give us a better view, you can keep the sideways perspective by not turning too much. Use your CPL to help better define the lines in the wheel. #8 - Not bad - is that a crosswalk that the car is sitting in? #9 - In a picture like this, the point that you want to highlight is the curve that the car is taking, while still maintaining focus on the car itself. Position the car in the lower right corner of the photo while trying to take a "high-altitude" shot - if you're driving slow enough, use the Live View, otherwise stand on the seat if you're passengering in a convertible, or sit in the window frame of the car if you're not afraid of flashing lights. #10 - good lighting, good pov, get rid of "Herring" in any final photos, focus CPL to define the wheels. #11 - trying too hard with your 50mm prime to open the lens up, back it down a notch and gain a little DOF - still easy to focus on the whole wheel while keeping the front end out of focus. #12 - good lighting, use CPL, zoom out because there's too much car in this pic. I think I would have taken a high perspective on this instead of the low perspective, but I'm not the one that took the photo. #13 - O hai! If you can find the D90 kit lens on craigslist (search "nikon 18-105"), it's a worthy investment. It's an 18-105 lens, and a good deal better at the 18-55mm length than the kit lens you have (though the kit lens you have is actually pretty decent for macro shooting). The cool thing is; there are probably some D90 users that also picked up the 18-200 lens when they bought their cameras and simply have no use for the D90 kit lens. My 18-105 rarely ever comes off my D5000, I also pack a f1.4 50mm, and a f2.8 70-200mm, though that big one can be a little pricey, and I don't use it nearly as much as I thought I would. Do you have a circular polarizer (CPL)? If not, you're in a world of hurt. |
Pictures of stationary cars does not interest me. For instance, when you're looking at porn, they don't show pics of the pornstar fully dressed sitting in a chair with her legs crossed. Instead, they show her gobbling three 11'' ebony caulks at once while getting dp'd by 2 midgets.
In for Pusha hatin', I told him on here liked his shit, and he didn't believe me. LOL |
Originally Posted by 240_to_miata
(Post 746494)
Cant wait for us to shoot my car together so you can teach me more. I dont know shit about my camera.
BTW how the fuck did you get that pic in willi at the bridge?
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746496)
One day I'll scan all of my prints and host them somewhere. Real men use film.
Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
(Post 746508)
#9 needs the pole removed...it's horrid on the eye.
Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
(Post 746508)
#11 needs less DOF/more area in focus. Might be better if the rear tire AND wheel were in focus. To me, the object in focus (the farmost part of the lip) is too narrow and distracting...I can't focus on the picture.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#1 - whatever is going on in the top right of the photo is way too distracting - put the wipers back down and get the person out of the picture.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#2 - There is no content here, nothing inspiring, this pic doesn't do much for me at all. Zooom out so that you can frame the top and bottom of the bumper, and get some taillight in as well.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#3 - Turn your CPL so that the windshield glares, if possible. Pics of faces inside the car are distracting from the actual car. Also, if you're going to have the car off center, try to have more space in front of the car instead of behind the car - i.e. "where is it going" or "what's in front of it" - given the rearward angle of the shot, you'll only get to see barely more in front of the car, but this picture will be the car "entering" the photo, and not "exiting" the photo.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#4 is strange because vertical lines should be vertical - notice the corner of the building. Yes, sometimes it's impossible, otherwise I would like this shot with a good bit more lighting, and pull some glare out with your CPL.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#5 - Bad lighting direction makes the front edges overstated, and the back edges tough to distinguish.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#6 - I like this shot, but being that it is still, try to be creative with perspective - take the shot from a perspective that a viewer wouldn't normally get to see. Use the hell out of liveview with that flip out screen - I do. Take a shot with the camera resting on your hands on the ground, Take another shot holding the camera way high in the air. The Live View can be tricky for motion shots because of terrible focusing speeds, but for still stuff like this, it works wonders.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#7 - turning the wheel slightly to the right will give us a better view, you can keep the sideways perspective by not turning too much. Use your CPL to help better define the lines in the wheel.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#8 - Not bad - is that a crosswalk that the car is sitting in?
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#9 - In a picture like this, the point that you want to highlight is the curve that the car is taking, while still maintaining focus on the car itself. Position the car in the lower right corner of the photo while trying to take a "high-altitude" shot - if you're driving slow enough, use the Live View, otherwise stand on the seat if you're passengering in a convertible, or sit in the window frame of the car if you're not afraid of flashing lights.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#10 - good lighting, good pov, get rid of "Herring" in any final photos, focus CPL to define the wheels.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#11 - trying too hard with your 50mm prime to open the lens up, back it down a notch and gain a little DOF - still easy to focus on the whole wheel while keeping the front end out of focus.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#12 - good lighting, use CPL, zoom out because there's too much car in this pic. I think I would have taken a high perspective on this instead of the low perspective, but I'm not the one that took the photo.
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 746529)
#13 - O hai!
If you can find the D90 kit lens on craigslist (search "nikon 18-105"), it's a worthy investment. It's an 18-105 lens, and a good deal better at the 18-55mm length than the kit lens you have (though the kit lens you have is actually pretty decent for macro shooting). The cool thing is; there are probably some D90 users that also picked up the 18-200 lens when they bought their cameras and simply have no use for the D90 kit lens. My 18-105 rarely ever comes off my D5000, I also pack a f1.4 50mm, and a f2.8 70-200mm, though that big one can be a little pricey, and I don't use it nearly as much as I thought I would. Do you have a circular polarizer (CPL)? If not, you're in a world of hurt.
Originally Posted by Bond
(Post 746532)
Pictures of stationary cars does not interest me. For instance, when you're looking at porn, they don't show pics of the pornstar fully dressed sitting in a chair with her legs crossed. Instead, they show her gobbling three 11'' ebony caulks at once while getting dp'd by 2 midgets.
Thanks for the input everybody! Also the replies I made are only to explain my thought processes while setting up/photographing/processing, not me trying to dismiss any comments. |
You reply is taken well over here :)
No I don't think taking the pole out would be too much. It's really contrasting to the trees behind it, if it were a dark color, it might look better as well. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands