MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Who's running AEM UEGO with MSI? Versus LC1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2007, 01:33 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default Who's running AEM UEGO with MSI? Versus LC1

Who is running the AEM UEGO wideband setup with their MS? Who is this working well for? I'm having some issues with autotune working correctly as well as MLV. Neither work as they're supposed to. Both make my car go dangerously lean, leaving it very undrivable. IOW, lots of bucking and power loss due to the fuel maps being pretty much what I would call destroyed. I have the custom.ini files adjust appropriately and my target tables setup correctly as well. Pretty much no idea what the problem is and i've been trying to figure it out for a good amount of time now.
Is there any insight to this that I might be missing? I've done the code conversion to make megatune read exactly the same AFR as what comes up on the gauge, so that is very accurate. I have also done the code conversion to make it possible to enter AFR values in the target table instead of voltage values.
You can see the Volts to AFR conversion writeup here: http://forums.plastikracing.net/view...?p=52097#52097
The reading adjustment on the same forum by the same guy.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 11-25-2007, 02:42 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Trent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,651
Total Cats: 39
Default

I'm interested in this as well, as i'll be running a similar setup when my MSPNP gets here.
Trent is offline  
Old 11-25-2007, 08:57 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

I'm running the AEM UEGO gauge with my MSPNP and I've done the exact same things (code conversion to make megatune read exactly the same AFR as what comes up on the gauge, so that is very accurate. ... code conversion to make it possible to enter AFR values in the target table instead of voltage values.)

When you say MLV you mean the log viewer isn't working right or the VE Analyzer?

I am having no problems using MLV VE Analyzer at all. Autotune on the other hand I have never gotten to work because I've been too lazy to edit the parameters in the code

does what you are seeing for AFRs in the log correspond with what you saw during the logging run?

send me your current msq file and a log and let me see what my VE Analyzer does with it.
paul is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:25 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
XxGoKoUxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: orlando, FL
Posts: 558
Total Cats: 0
Default

i will be.... thanks for the go-ahead paul
XxGoKoUxX is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 02:21 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
IcantDo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: VA Beach
Posts: 1,996
Total Cats: 51
Default

any new info on this topic?
IcantDo55 is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 03:03 AM
  #6  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ThePass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
Default

I'm interested in hearing any updates about this issue as well as I just sent the money tonight for an AEM UEGO and plan to add a MS soon - are these not very compatible? If so I will return it immediately, I need something that will work with MS.
-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:16 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

They work perfectly and I recommend them over LC1s now just because they're easier to use and install.
You have to change the calibration a little to make the AEM and MS read exactly the same but that is easy. The link is in my signature.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:42 AM
  #8  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

The AEM is easier, but also less flexible. I've had both, and prefer the innovate product because it's configurable to every application. The AEM, not as much.


Ben
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
10-19-2015 03:23 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
10-01-2015 09:30 AM



Quick Reply: Who's running AEM UEGO with MSI? Versus LC1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.