![]() |
Closed Loop Boost Control Issues
6 Attachment(s)
Hi All - I have an nb2 w/ a goal of 170kpa. I've been trying to tweak out a closed loop setup based on the information I've found here. I'm attaching my recent tune/logs. The issue I'm having is the 'basic' setup is still overshooting by quite a bit. My aim is 170kpa and my boost cut is 185kpa. I moved the slider bar all the way down to 150 for sensitivity, but I decided to stop as I've seen others post their setup of 250+ and they said theirs gets up to PSI and just stays without overshoot. Is it as easy as continuing to reduce the sensitivity slider?
When I go back to open loop it seems that depending on the heat soak of the engine, a 36% duty cycle will get my 170kpa or sometimes need a 40% duty cycle for the same. That is why I'm trying to get closed loop working. So anyhow, hopefully, that's enough info. I'm attaching my log and setup if anyone can help me figure out why I'm still overshooting by so much. EDIT: Anyone ever thought about putting the boost controller in the area between engine bay and firewall? I have it tucked up under the driver's headlight and its still getting to 170F. I noticed the only "cold spot" is that place where I stick my ratchet between outside of the engine bay before it gets to the windshield. Hopefully I'm describing that location right? It was only like 95F after about an hour of street tuning. |
I couldn't get the basic control to work without fluctuations. Maybe it would work if you keep reducing the gain slider, but I still don't think the results would be optimal. It is my understanding that basic just sets the PID gain values to 100/100/100.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Watterson02
(Post 1650696)
I couldn't get the basic control to work without fluctuations. Maybe it would work if you keep reducing the gain slider, but I still don't think the results would be optimal. It is my understanding that basic just sets the PID gain values to 100/100/100.
|
Originally Posted by Watterson02
(Post 1650696)
I couldn't get the basic control to work without fluctuations. Maybe it would work if you keep reducing the gain slider, but I still don't think the results would be optimal. It is my understanding that basic just sets the PID gain values to 100/100/100.
|
Yes, that's reasonable. You could try a higher delta, 30 or 35 kPa, and see if it gets you closer.
|
Originally Posted by redursidae
(Post 1650801)
Yes, that's reasonable. You could try a higher delta, 30 or 35 kPa, and see if it gets you closer.
|
Yes, in theory. But in practice, you’ll get it perfect for one day, at a certain altitude and temperature, and it’ll behave differently another day at different temperature and altitude. That’s why closed-loop is a thing. If it’s close and it’s consistent, I would say leave it alone.
|
One might argue that you could get closer to what you're describing by actually tuning the PID gain values, but if you want the valve to stay completely shut until it is right at the target pressure for theoretically perfect spool then yeah I believe yeah that might be a pipe dream. Maybe if you had an actual electronically controlled wastegate, but I doubt it with a pneumatic one. It should already be better than the Open Loop though, so at least there is that. If you do go and decide to tune the PID terms, make sure to back up your current tune.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands