MS-II Sequencer
Who is getting ready to switch to MS-II sequencer? Ive started my homework on it and I'm discovering some neat features about it. I think I am going to order it as soon as it comes out.
|
link?
I'm not up and up on my MSII. |
|
I can't afford it.
|
There are so few of us that are MS-II even that I can't imagine many people jumping on board, but if you do, please report back as we need people to pioneer (cough...cough....guinea pig:)) stuff like that. Hell, there was a time when going emanage was a big deal and MS-I wasn't even on the radar.
|
Originally Posted by brgracer
(Post 183051)
There are so few of us that are MS-II even that I can't imagine many people jumping on board, but if you do, please report back as we need people to pioneer (cough...cough....guinea pig:)) stuff like that. Hell, there was a time when going emanage was a big deal and MS-I wasn't even on the radar.
|
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 182962)
Who is getting ready to switch to MS-II sequencer? Ive started my homework on it and I'm discovering some neat features about it. I think I am going to order it as soon as it comes out.
should be swopping to MSII over the christmas period too. exciting times for us DIY MegaSquirters :) |
So this must be what became of the router board. My big attraction for the original router board concept was the ion sensing. That got dropped because there was trouble getting the crank angle measured accurately enough to do any good. Last spring (I think) I remember reading a post by either Bruce or Al that they may have solved that problem and there was some hope we might see ion sensing again. I didn't see any mention in the link that RDSnake posted, though.
For anyone that doesn't know, ion sensing has the potential to do for spark what wide bands have done for fuel. Perfect ignition timing without a dyno. Other random bits of info: We would also need a capacitive discharge ignition (CDI) system to make use of it. I think, but cold be completely talking out my ass, that GM used a system like this around 2000 for mis-fire detection (no crank angle calculations). On a completely separate note, I'm a little concerned that more and more MS parts are coming in SMT. I hope us DIY'er aren't forgotten. |
BTW, I posted this last April and not one god damn response. I hate you guys.
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/showthread.php?t=8831 |
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 183177)
Hehehe...I know exactly what youre saying. I'm actually trying to pick out igntion components so I can take advantage of its COP feature and I mean individually fired COP. Its pretty interesting stuff.
|
Originally Posted by arga
(Post 183537)
BTW, I posted this last April and not one god damn response. I hate you guys.
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/showthread.php?t=8831 |
Comeon Arga we can't help it that we are both cheap and not bold enough to dabble in MS2
|
In layman's terms, what exactly is the benefit of this board?
|
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
(Post 183559)
In layman's terms, what exactly is the benefit of this board?
|
Originally Posted by reddroptop
(Post 183539)
You can do this with MS1, no 500$ board required.
|
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 183604)
Why would I want to step down to MS-I from MS-II?
You cannot be serious spending that kind of money on a megasquirt. |
Originally Posted by reddroptop
(Post 183605)
You cannot be serious spending that kind of money on a megasquirt. "The price for the MS-II Sequencer has not been set yet. Initial estimates are that it will be a 35 - 40% increase over the cost of MicroSquirt, since there are roughly 35% more components, and the added harness assembly, Ampseal connectors, assembly cost, and enclosure, plus the extra cost for the aluminum and panel cutout for the second connector. Since MicroSquirt retails for about $400, the estimated price is likely between $520 and $580. This could change somewhat, but is a reasonable ball-park figure. When pricing is finalized, it will be posted here." How much is a MSPNP and what kind of MS would you get if you bought one? |
Yeah - I was pretty excited about it, but I'm not sure about the mechanism they are going to use - it really seemed a lot more aimed at V-8s. I was a little worried about the accuracy of the whole thing. Like, do they really need to scale a factor of ten? And, what keeps MS limited to two channels, anyway? That doesn't make sense to me.
SMT isn't so bad, and you can still mod it. Sure, it's a little more of a pain, but not a lot more. Getting a board built then swaping a few things out is still possible. I almost did it on this one. I, too, and really curious about this ion sensing. A lot of stuff gets done for emissions than have no benefit to power output... And generally mask problems (think MSD folks). I guess you could technically build your own sequencer external box, but I wouldn't. :-) |
Originally Posted by AbeFM
(Post 183621)
Yeah - I was pretty excited about it, but I'm not sure about the mechanism they are going to use - it really seemed a lot more aimed at V-8s. I was a little worried about the accuracy of the whole thing. Like, do they really need to scale a factor of ten? And, what keeps MS limited to two channels, anyway? That doesn't make sense to me.
Originally Posted by arga
So this must be what became of the router board. My big attraction for the original router board concept was the ion sensing. That got dropped because there was trouble getting the crank angle measured accurately enough to do any good. Last spring (I think) I remember reading a post by either Bruce or Al that they may have solved that problem and there was some hope we might see ion sensing again. I didn't see any mention in the link that RDSnake posted, though.
|
Matt Cramer:
Do you guys or MS retailers have a more definite ETA on the sequencer? |
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 183615)
MS would you get if you bought one?
It is actually the only board design that I know of that lets me flash MSQ's without having to unplug the coils. I didn't design the board, so I dunno why this is possible. |
Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
(Post 183941)
It's a couple of things that limits the current model to two channels, mostly processor outputs and keeping the board backward compatible with MS-I. Each injector channel needs two outputs, one for the regular pulse and the other for PWM current limiting. Some people have talked about modifying an MS-II for sequential injection on four channels by adding peak and hold driver boards to it, but this may be some ways away.
If it's based on V2.xx, does that leave V3.xx people orphaned? |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 183598)
fully sequential injection and ignition
|
Originally Posted by AbeFM
(Post 184024)
If it's based on V2.xx, does that leave V3.xx people orphaned?
Originally Posted by RdSnake
Matt Cramer:
Do you guys or MS retailers have a more definite ETA on the sequencer? |
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
(Post 184397)
I got that much... but what benefit does sequential injection have? Smoother engine? More power? Better gas mileage? Easier to tune?
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 184412)
Read up much? http://www.megamanual.com/MS%20FAQ.htm#sequential
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. Also it likely helps on many-cylinder engines, in the same way. |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 184412)
Read up much? http://www.megamanual.com/MS%20FAQ.htm#sequential
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. I am after over all quality of the cars' driveablility. Who wouldnt want factory like idle, tip in and transition? The difference in horsepower numbers may be negligible but overall quality of the setup would surely improve. Of course, for somebody who drives at WOT all the time, it wouldn't make much of a difference, would it? |
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 184526)
I am after over all quality of the cars' driveablility. Who wouldnt want factory like idle, tip in and transition? The difference in horsepower numbers may be negligible but overall quality of the setup would surely improve. Of course, for somebody who drives at WOT all the time, it wouldn't make much of a difference, would it?
Low ohm injectors and sequential injection are two big improvements, as are staged injectors. Then again, so are stock cams. Someday, I'll get biggie cams, you know, when I get biggie pistons and blocks and such. |
Originally Posted by AbeFM
(Post 184534)
It's what separates man from savage beast, and miatas from dsms. :-)
We live in a savage world inhabited by cavemen, dont we.... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands