MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

MS PNP requires reading and following directions???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2015, 02:43 PM
  #121  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Ah, makes sense. On my setup the high VE rows are in the 130's around 250kPa. But that's supercharged, not turbo. Also I need more timing up top, I think that's going to change those cells, previous testing shows adding even 1* of timing causing AFRs to lean out, requiring more fuel. Will be interesting to see where I end up once I get the spark tuned for E85, might be closer to what you show in the midrange at full boost.
Pat, thank you for the adjustments. My VE table will again be a work in progress, but preliminary testing is promising; specifically in the 1000-2500 range. Still have the rubber banding flat spotting and I'm starting to wonder if it's my plugs, packs, or wires.
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 04:08 PM
  #122  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by satisfied
Pat, thank you for the adjustments. My VE table will again be a work in progress, but preliminary testing is promising; specifically in the 1000-2500 range. Still have the rubber banding flat spotting and I'm starting to wonder if it's my plugs, packs, or wires.
Send me a datalog of you driving it on the new tune, and also, what spark plugs and what gap are they set at?
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 01:51 AM
  #123  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Send me a datalog of you driving it on the new tune, and also, what spark plugs and what gap are they set at?
I'm on duty so it will come out tomorrow night. Plugs, NGK ???s, gapped to...????? wires DENSO stockers.

That's all stock and was replaced right before I bought it 5k miles ago.
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 06:05 AM
  #124  
Junior Member
 
Dlaitini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cedar City, UT
Posts: 239
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
looks much different than any others i've seen. but like I said, if it works, then whateverzzzzzzzzz

mine typically look like this--getting a little fatter where you're getting leaner:




This confuses the ever living **** out of me. You have a spread of 40-237 (197 points) across that VE map

My VE map has a spread of 85 - 142 ( 57 points) nowhere near the resolution of yours.

Req fuel calculator says by default should run 6.6 . Still gets a small spread across fuel map.

Another post ( https://www.miataturbo.net/megasquir...9/#post1227415 ) says to run that get a good fuel map and then do a bunch of maths to set highest point to be around 220 and it is supposed to give more res, so req fuel ends up being around 2.7 and my spread on the VE from highest to lowest is still way smaller. It never gets up that high and spread is still low
Dlaitini is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 10:50 AM
  #125  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

this is what my actual fuel map looked like with those same injectors:





dont worry about the ******* spread.

dont worry about the ******* "resolution".

dont worry about the ******* shape.

dont worry about the ******* numbers.

worry about if you have enough fuel or not.
Attached Thumbnails MS PNP requires reading and following directions???-80-realmap_b7901b5117b395b1a94da4a6b16c6e40acb3f5c5.png  
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 01:42 PM
  #126  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
this is what my actual fuel map looked like with those same injectors:

*helpful picture*

dont worry about the ******* spread.

dont worry about the ******* "resolution".

dont worry about the ******* shape.

dont worry about the ******* numbers.

worry about if you have enough fuel or not.
words to live by.

As promised here is the latest log. I did a run to the gas station, an on ramp uphill WOT run, and several 2nd and 3rd gear "what happens if I went WOT RIGHT NOW?" moments.

The drivability of of these new settings is AMAZING, just a few slight flat rubber bandy feelings spots that I can't quite decipher where the issue is coming from. My AFR's look good, but I'm staring at the gauge pod, ad I'm not a pro at reading these logs yet (what to compare, what to look out for, etc. etc.)

Thanks everyone for contributing, specifically Pat, Rev, Brain, and 18psi.

Attached Files
File Type: msl
2015-09-26_10.26.58.msl (2.81 MB, 123 views)
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 01:46 PM
  #127  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

The current tune.

420cc RX8 injectors
Stock exhaust
BEGI-s kit
cxracing FMIC
greddy knockoff BOV VTA
6psi

car resides at sea level in mild climate.

Someone might be able to use this as a good starting point.

No responsibility taken if it explodes your car.
Attached Files
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 02:07 PM
  #128  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

After reviewing the data at WOT time which starts at 885s, the only thing that seems bouncy is my AFRs. When viewed on the VE table, the target glides across 35-3800RPM all the way to 7kRPM at 160kPa, but my log shows anywhere from 142-172kPa during the same instance.

Is it because there is too much of a difference between the numbers at 140-160-180kPa on my VE table, so as engine load increases or decreases slightly during WOT it is making LARGE (relatively) changes to my fuel spray and thus giving me a rubber band effect in my power band?
Attached Thumbnails MS PNP requires reading and following directions???-so-close-26sep2015.jpg  
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 02:28 PM
  #129  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,296
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by satisfied
..
The drivability of of these new settings is AMAZING...
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 05:10 PM
  #130  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
deezums's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 201
Default

Originally Posted by satisfied

Thanks everyone for contributing, specifically Pat, Rev, Brain, and 18psi.
Yeah, well **** you too.
deezums is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 05:28 PM
  #131  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Lol I'm sure I'm forgetting more people than just you man. But thanks, honestly I really appreciate it.
satisfied is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 05:56 PM
  #132  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by deezums
Yeah, well **** you too.
Lulz
sixshooter is online now  
Old 09-27-2015, 09:29 AM
  #133  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

:P
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 04:24 AM
  #134  
Junior Member
 
2010 WRX Limited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 106
Total Cats: -11
Default

This thread has been a good read so far. I have no idea what everyone is talking about but still entertaining lol.

I'm going to be adding an MSPNP-Pro to my 1990 with 1997 a engine soon so I might be the next guy trying to decipher my *** from a hole in the ground. It's good to know that in the midst of getting flamed I might actually get some decent support if I can hang in.
2010 WRX Limited is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 09:58 AM
  #135  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by 2010 WRX Limited
This thread has been a good read so far. I have no idea what everyone is talking about but still entertaining lol.

I'm going to be adding an MSPNP-Pro to my 1990 with 1997 a engine soon so I might be the next guy trying to decipher my *** from a hole in the ground. It's good to know that in the midst of getting flamed I might actually get some decent support if I can hang in.
Yes, info versus flame ratio varies by whether or not OP appears to have done some research and is giving lots of details or not. Attitude and effort is important.
sixshooter is online now  
Old 10-03-2015, 12:55 PM
  #136  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I'm just a dick.
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 01:17 PM
  #137  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Originally Posted by 2010 WRX Limited
This thread has been a good read so far. I have no idea what everyone is talking about but still entertaining lol.

I'm going to be adding an MSPNP-Pro to my 1990 with 1997 a engine soon so I might be the next guy trying to decipher my *** from a hole in the ground. It's good to know that in the midst of getting flamed I might actually get some decent support if I can hang in.
I would strongly recommend MS3 or better. There are so many ways getting the newest MS is a good idea, and when listed out it doesn't really hit you. rev tried steering me towards getting an MS3, but I was stubborn, thought 6 PSI would be enough, figured if it's more sophisticated than the stock ECU then it's going to be worlds better. Which it is, BUT, MS3 is worlds better than MS2. I've seen the light and bought a Rev MS3 for my wife's car, and she's not even going turbo.

I regret not spending major coin on the newest and best ECU.
I regret not tuning my car before I went turbo.
I regret not getting 550cc+ injectors from the get-go
I regret focusing my research on VE, and not studying spark tables, AE, and AFR tables.
I regret getting a chinese turbo


Assume from the get-go you will eventually want to make 60PSI at 3000 RPM, and buy parts that support that goal. Don't wildly change things. Change 1 thing at a time. When you encounter an issue, stop and think, search (you won't find what you're looking for because you'll be frustrated and you need to use the google search forum method to find what you really need) then ask, get flamed 50 times, get a good answer and try it out. It's a steep learning curve but it all comes together very quickly.

Car runs crazy good at ~12PSI now. 4.5 weeks to get to that point.

Week 1 - Won't idle-Idles, but won't run-runs AND idles but poorly.
Week 2 - Pretty sure bandaids run better-start tweaking stuff, runs good-tweak it more, runs bad-undo what you did, runs worse.
Week 3 - miatatur-bro enters the ring like John Cena, gives me a hyperspeed education, tweaks my spark map, teaches me to use VEA on Megalog viewer, instead of VEAL on Tunerstudio-I can now change things at will by reviewing specific points of data, and I am free to actively disagree with what VE analyze thinks I should do since I'm using MLV instead of TS.
Week 4 - give up on AE pretty much completely, doesn't seem to matter since VE tables are so good-Stop worrying about the shape of my VE table, Brain is right, the shape means nothing. My table looks like Appalachia, but with more sodomy.

Current week - Nitpicking to get it "perfect."

I wouldn't trade the experience for anything. Good luck with your build, and again, get an MS3 or better.
satisfied is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 01:24 PM
  #138  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I'm proud of this guy. He has seen the light.
18psi is offline  
Old 10-06-2015, 01:24 AM
  #139  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
satisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Total Cats: -33
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I'm proud of this guy. He has seen the light.
I was hunting down idle issues when I went out for a WOT run with my new 3" exhaust. Sounds crazy, and on top of that spool is down to 3400RPM, not bad for the ISIS knockoff turbo BEGI sells. BOV blew at 5k RPM without me lifting, and after I could not build positive boost. I was able to feel inside of the outlet and touch charge piping. Pretty sure that's the culprit. Carnage at 524S.

I've never heard of a knockoff ebay greddy dying. I guess I'm a first victim of an even worse run of chinese ****?

So, do I want a TurboXS RFL like I had back in the early 2000s? I think I kind of do, only ebay is calling me again with their cheap prices... Thoughts?
Attached Files
File Type: msl
2015-10-05_21.50.55.msl (1.96 MB, 120 views)
satisfied is offline  
Old 10-06-2015, 01:33 AM
  #140  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by satisfied
ISIS knockoff turbo
Savington is offline  


Quick Reply: MS PNP requires reading and following directions???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.