MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

1995 Miata - MS II V 3.0 (DIY EFI) - Running MAF

Old 01-31-2016, 05:01 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default 1995 Miata - MS II V 3.0 (DIY EFI) - Running MAF

Hi Guys,

Wow time has passed since I posted my intro https://www.miataturbo.net/meet-gree...-thread-83161/

Since then I have been making some small progress with the Mega Squirt project, I have finished the ECU build, completed the Y harness ( which I built to test inputs and outputs before going full stand alone) The ECU, Tuner Studio and Logging all work, as well a few of the basic inputs like, TPS, CLT, RPM are working well.

Class rules for STS state that I must use OE sensors for the inputs to the ECU, so I need to sort out how to use these to tune the Mega Squirt, I assume that I will be using the MAF? If so my next task is getting to know the MAF and values and how I can use these signals to tune the Mega Squirt.

I have searched for many hours but I can not seem to find any information about the Voltage output values for my Miata MAF ( B6BF 197400-031 ) Does anyone here know ? I assume that this would be an option for the PNP guys to use the MAF ?

Or can someone shed some light on how I might be able to get around the MAF output ? Like maybe using TPS ?

Or can I use MAP or TPS - to reverse engineer the MAF output ?

Any help is much appreciated

Dave

Last edited by blackice; 01-31-2016 at 08:30 PM.
blackice is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 12:28 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
Default

Techsalvager here on the forum is running with the MAF as well. You might want to contact him or maybe he'll chime in.
WestfieldMX5 is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 12:32 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
cyotani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Azusa, CA
Posts: 1,407
Total Cats: 116
Default

What are the units of the inputs to the table? V and CFM?
cyotani is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 01:44 PM
  #4  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

a bunch of STS guys were doing it. some dude on M.net was building MSes from them all, had some PNP unit to fit into the stock ecu that took care of the conversion thing. I never followed it.

maybe Andy Hollis?
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 01:59 PM
  #5  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by cyotani
What are the units of the inputs to the table? V and CFM?
I believe that I need to create a 1024 element table of the air flow versus voltage, measured in grams per sec / 0-5 Volts.
blackice is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 02:03 PM
  #6  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by WestfieldMX5
Techsalvager here on the forum is running with the MAF as well. You might want to contact him or maybe he'll chime in.
Thanks !
I will send him a PM
blackice is offline  
Old 02-01-2016, 02:08 PM
  #7  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
blackice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
a bunch of STS guys were doing it. some dude on M.net was building MSes from them all, had some PNP unit to fit into the stock ecu that took care of the conversion thing. I never followed it.

maybe Andy Hollis?
Oh hey good call on Andy... never even crossed my mind, I will.
Thanks
blackice is offline  
Old 02-20-2016, 11:56 PM
  #8  
Newb
 
moxnix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 0
Default

The STS ones were all for the 1.6L miata I think. Justin Mitchell (JustinHoMi) and Andy Pfotenhauer were the ones building them but neither have built any recently.

I know Justin was looking into building the 1.8L stuff back when he was building them but I don't know if he ever got around to building/testing one.

Interested in seeing where this goes since my 94 needs something like this.
moxnix is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 07:54 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

I think those guys stopped making them as they changed the rules. Reading the current rules 14.10.F.1, 2.a,b, says nothing about replacing the factory ECU. Says you can reprogram factory ECU or piggyback it. I don't see the old rule of "it's OK to standalone as long as it fits in stock case".

And since you can't add sensors, you can't run MAP. As you mentioned though, you can use a MAP to create a table to document flow from the MAF. Once you have it running well on the MAF, piggyback the stock ECU so it does all emissions stuff and have the MS control the engine. Remove the MAP use from the system of course.
hector is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 08:47 AM
  #10  
Newb
 
moxnix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hector
I think those guys stopped making them as they changed the rules. Reading the current rules 14.10.F.1, 2.a,b, says nothing about replacing the factory ECU. Says you can reprogram factory ECU or piggyback it. I don't see the old rule of "it's OK to standalone as long as it fits in stock case".
Megasquirt is considered "reprogramming" via hardware and is legal for pre OBD2 cars.
moxnix is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:08 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

Yes and it must be piggybacked. It can't be a stand alone ECU installation. And the piggyback harness has to be a Y installation. No cutting and splicing. This means you would be able to unplug the MS from the car and run off the factory ECU.
hector is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:13 AM
  #12  
Newb
 
moxnix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hector
Yes and it must be piggybacked. It can't be a stand alone ECU installation. And the piggyback harness has to be a Y installation. No cutting and splicing. This means you would be able to unplug the MS from the car and run off the factory ECU.
No you can still run the megasquirt in the stock ECU case legally. The rules have not changed on that.
moxnix is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:25 AM
  #13  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by moxnix
No you can still run the megasquirt in the stock ECU case legally. The rules have not changed on that.
yeah, this was my understanding, that the MS was fit inside the stock case.


here's the dude I was thinking about: http://forum.miata.net/vb/showpost.p...&postcount=988




he used to have a site dedicated to it, and would build them for others, but it seems to not be available anymore: http://www.justinmitchell.net/docs/d...ts2_megasquirt



he posted something about it here in 2009, but never read anything about this since:

https://www.miataturbo.net/megasquir...e4/#post471856


if he can provide an information about what they are currently doing or how to do it yourself we can certainly help you out.
Attached Thumbnails 1995 Miata - MS II V 3.0 (DIY EFI) - Running MAF-80-undefined_725c241b4254e921fd0707f00e9b60e71b38feab.png  
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:28 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files...pdf?1445897937

Read for yourself. And understand that if it doesn't say you can do it, it means that you can't. The old rules used to say it. That verbiage is not there now. So you can't do it. And there is no such thing as grandfathering in Solo so anyone that has it is not within the rules.

Edit: Nevermind, reading malfunction. It says you can. Must not be awake yet
hector is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:33 AM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by hector
That verbiage is not there now.
it's still there:
1. Reprogrammed ECU/PCM (via hardware and/or software) may be
used in the standard housing.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:34 AM
  #16  
Newb
 
moxnix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hector
http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files...pdf?1445897937

Read for yourself. And understand that if it doesn't say you can do it, it means that you can't. The old rules used to say it. That verbiage is not there now. So you can't do it. And there is no such thing as grandfathering in Solo so anyone that has it is not within the rules.
I have read it many times.

The Megasquirt is considered Reprogramming via hardware and is legal in the stock box with the stock sensors.

The rules from 2005 say.
1. Reprogrammed ECU may be used in the standard housing. Traction control parameters may not be altered. Altered engine controllers may not alter boost levels in forced induction engines.
The rules from 2016 say.
1. Reprogrammed ECU/PCM (via hardware and/or software) may be used in the standard housing.
moxnix is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:40 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

Yeah I contacted him when I wanted one built and never heard anything back. That was 2011. It wasn't cheap as he did lots of stuff to the MS to make it work much like a stock ECU. I can't remember now but I think back then you even had to have working emissions stuff. It seems as if now what you need to have is a working OBD2 port. I don't see anything about other emissions related stuff but I seem to remember a discussion that some thought emissions stuff had to be functional. Never bothered with it as I went to CSP and went standalone.
hector is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 09:53 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

BTW, is it just me or does that chart say that the OEM 1.6L is making 130 wheel torque at 5000 rpm? That. Can't. Be.
hector is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 10:21 AM
  #19  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

who knows, doesnt even look like a stock miata dyno curve.
Braineack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsmx5
Build Threads
1980
04-12-2024 08:08 PM
pl11
ECUs and Tuning
3
02-03-2016 04:14 PM
VRRMPSH
Miata parts for sale/trade
4
01-28-2016 08:41 PM
Rallas
General Miata Chat
11
01-27-2016 12:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1995 Miata - MS II V 3.0 (DIY EFI) - Running MAF



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.