Need timing table for 20 psi and 1.6
i recently swapped out my turbo for a smaller Turbo. Where I was originally making 14 psi max at 7k rpm, I’m making around 18 or so psi at 6500 rpm or so. Fuel looks good. Just want to see what a timing table should look like in this case. This is my daily driver and I do not see max boost on a weekly basis, but would like to know I’d be ok if I did want to. What max total timing should I be at during WOT? Thanks in advance. This is on a 1.6 |
99.99
|
doesnt matter -- retard it to 5° -- it's gonna bend the rods.
|
Allofit and more!
|
Why is there so many mixed reviews on this subject. Some say they have run 20 psi on stock bottom end and stock compression with no issues. Then there are reviews like this. My engine has 323 GTX rods and pistons and my compression is lower. I know they aren’t that much better than stock, but what’s the separation with this? |
Because it's a 1.6 that nobody cares about anymore, pressure doesn't mean anything, power means everything, and you should probably tune your car.
If you want a magic bullet that might work without any effort on your part, try a Powercard. |
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1483350)
Because it's a 1.6 that nobody cares about anymore, pressure doesn't mean anything, power means everything, and you should probably tune your car.
If you want a magic bullet that might work without any effort on your part, try a Powercard. |
Originally Posted by mx5newbie
(Post 1483351)
Wow! I appreciate your honesty But really, you didn't end up with a stronger motor with the 323GTX stuff. Just one that will respond worse on the way to bending rods. Same "danger point" as you had with Miata internals. Find out how many power you're making, then evaluate from there. |
boost is everything. nothing else matters.
doesn't matter what car. doesn't matter what engine. doesn't matter what turbo. got a twin turbski v8? got a 1 cyl moped? JUST RUN 20PSI BRO. aint nobody got time fo any details. |
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1483352)
Hey at least someone does around here. :P
But really, you didn't end up with a stronger motor with the 323GTX stuff. Just one that will respond worse on the way to bending rods. Same "danger point" as you had with Miata internals. Find out how many power you're making, then evaluate from there. |
Originally Posted by mx5newbie
(Post 1483359)
i bought the car this way. Just didn’t like the lag of the larger turbo. Trying to figure of a good way to lower boost if I need to. I need to port the waste gate hole as well. |
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1483360)
You should probably figure out if you need to lower boost. Then make decisions from there.
|
Fix creep and/or find out how much power you're making. I wouldn't put an 8psi actuator in unless you want to run 8psi.
|
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 1483363)
Fix creep and/or find out how much power you're making. I wouldn't put an 8psi actuator in unless you want to run 8psi.
|
I was thinking about something. I have overboost protection in msq, so until I get this figured out, can I simple set my kpa to 205 or so to cut fuel. Is that not what it’s designed for? I checked it as it sits now, it’s like 227 kpa and cutting spark. Am I figuring this correctly. I’ve read where this figure is kpa-100/6.85 to get the proper psi for the overboost protection. If that’s correct, it’s now to to protoect around 18.5 psi. Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks |
its going to suck to drive and constantly hit a fuel cut.
Why is there so many mixed reviews on this subject. Some say they have run 20 psi on stock bottom end and stock compression with no issues. Then there are reviews like this. My engine has 323 GTX rods and pistons and my compression is lower. I know they aren’t that much better than stock, but what’s the separation with this? Here's a law we live by here: Miata rods are weak bananas past 250rwtq. with your CR and rods you can probably get away with a lot more. But stock, no way. and everyone here will agree. Start with a miata basemap, and advance it until you hear knock with your detcan and then tell us what it can take... |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1483413)
its going to suck to drive and constantly hit a fuel cut.
there's only mixed reviews here coming from one Ford Escort shop... Here's a law we live by here: Miata rods are weak bananas past 250rwtq. with your CR and rods you can probably get away with a lot more. But stock, no way. and everyone here will agree. Start with a miata basemap, and advance it until you hear knock with your detcan and then tell us what it can take... |
Boost pressure is a worthless measure. It is a measure of backpressure in the system. It is possible to switch turbos, run 10 more psi, and make less power. LBS of air passing through the engine is the actual measure of power. If you double the air, you can double the fuel to match, and then make roughly double the power. If the engine or turbo can't pass as much air as you are trying to put through it, you end up compressing the air more and more thereby increasing the boost pressure (or backpressure).
Timing bends rods even at lower boost levels. Cylinder pressure at particular crank angles is a result of timing. Some crank angles are more forgiving for a given amount of cylinder pressure than others. But generally, about 250wtq will be the limit for favorably timed engines with any rods that came from Mazda. |
Originally Posted by mx5newbie
(Post 1483414)
totally understood, but doesnt that mean it would only cut the fuel when that boost level is hit?
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1483420)
if youre running MS, it will cut fuel if it *thinks* youre going to hit that boost level -- it looks at the trend and cuts fuel before the limit. either way, it's still unpleasant when you hit one -- I always liked to keep a boost cut 3-4psi above my boost level.
|
Originally Posted by Morello
(Post 1483423)
Somewhat off-topic but 3-4psi seems like a lot? In going from 8psi to 10psi I went from 220whp/200ftlbs to 250whp/220ftlbs. It would seem that a boost spike to 14psi would be nearing engine-grenade territory? Fuel cut is unpleasant, but less unpleasant than noodle rods...
|
Since we are speaking on cut, have either of you experienced fuel or spark cut? If so, what does one experience when this happens? I know the car will stop pulling or whatever, but is there a pop or some other indication that tells you this happened |
Originally Posted by Morello
(Post 1483423)
Somewhat off-topic but 3-4psi seems like a lot? In going from 8psi to 10psi I went from 220whp/200ftlbs to 250whp/220ftlbs. It would seem that a boost spike to 14psi would be nearing engine-grenade territory? Fuel cut is unpleasant, but less unpleasant than noodle rods...
|
Originally Posted by mx5newbie
(Post 1483425)
Since we are speaking on cut, have either of you experienced fuel or spark cut? If so, what does one experience when this happens? I know the car will stop pulling or whatever, but is there a pop or some other indication that tells you this happened |
Somewhat off-topic but 3-4psi seems like a lot? In going from 8psi to 10psi I went from 220whp/200ftlbs to 250whp/220ftlbs. It would seem that a boost spike to 14psi would be nearing engine-grenade territory? Fuel cut is unpleasant, but less unpleasant than noodle rods... you should only ever hit it if something was ever majorly wrong--like the boost source on your wastegate fell off--and like it would kick in so quickly, there's very low chance of any damage. take my setup for example: i was running about 14psi at peak torque, but my turbo tapered off past 6k, so I actually increased boost to 16psi by redline. if I set my boost cut to 16psi, it would always hit as I neared redline (remember the code is predictive -- especially on quick ramp ups as boost is building). Even if I set it to 18psi and my turbo wildly spooled up to 18psi -- the boost cut would kick in so quickly (probably around the 15-16psi zone and we are talking split seconds) I highly doubt any damage were to be done... It's a failsafe, so treat it like such. I set hard stops of timing and fuel in my tunes too. example, I ran 215kPa. so i had a timing row of 220kPa just above it, then another of 255kPa. Since MS interpolates, I'd keep the 220 row, just above, very close to my 16° timing. If I made the row just above 215, 255, then there's a change my final timing wouldn't actually be what I demanded in the table. But the 255 row would drop down a bunch, so the MS would reduce timing significantly as the boost would ever increase over 215. I'd do something similar in the fuel table, so there'd be like 10-20% more fuel up top above where I normally ran as a way to basically reduce power/torque and keep the motor safe in an "oh shit" moment. |
just go full retard like OP
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1483431)
retard timing above your boost level too.
you should only ever hit it if something was ever majorly wrong--like the boost source on your wastegate fell off--and like it would kick in so quickly, there's very low chance of any damage. take my setup for example: i was running about 14psi at peak torque, but my turbo tapered off past 6k, so I actually increased boost to 16psi by redline. if I set my boost cut to 16psi, it would always hit as I neared redline (remember the code is predictive -- especially on quick ramp ups as boost is building). Even if I set it to 18psi and my turbo wildly spooled up to 18psi -- the boost cut would kick in so quickly (probably around the 15-16psi zone and we are talking split seconds) I highly doubt any damage were to be done... It's a failsafe, so treat it like such. I set hard stops of timing and fuel in my tunes too. example, I ran 215kPa. so i had a timing row of 220kPa just above it, then another of 255kPa. Since MS interpolates, I'd keep the 220 row, just above, very close to my 16° timing. If I made the row just above 215, 255, then there's a change my final timing wouldn't actually be what I demanded in the table. But the 255 row would drop down a bunch, so the MS would reduce timing significantly as the boost would ever increase over 215. I'd do something similar in the fuel table, so there'd be like 10-20% more fuel up top above where I normally ran as a way to basically reduce power/torque and keep the motor safe in an "oh shit" moment. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...659736f1f.jpeg |
Daily reminder that we still don't know anything about your turbo or how much power you might be making.
|
Understood. I just made a discovery. Tested my tial wastegate actuator and noticed air was going thru it and blowing out the other side. I opened it and noticed the diaphragm was offset. Fixed it now its working. With that being said Im sure my wastegate was never opening. It could still use some porting for sure. oh yea, with the larger turbo and a shitty 90* bend down pipe it made 214 rwhp and 179 rwtq. I’ve since replaced the down pipe and now have swapped the turbo. I’m going to port it a little before I reinstall. Should be able to control boost now since I’ve got the actuator working. I’m going to take it back to the dyno once it get the boost situated |
Got it all back together. It’s now making 11-13 psi and it feels good. Quick spool and runs great. Thanks guys for all your honesty and help. I will not touch it until I can get it on the dyno |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands