Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
Bullshit. Your reply was a punk-ass adolescent response and georgefury1 was correct to call you on it. You're gonna fail big-time in business if you use that condescending attitude with your customers (or boss or coworkers). Budget authority and/or supervisory rating authority will crush smart-ass snark and wit every time.
Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
Bullshit again. "Arbitrary"? How about you pull the data for narrow band O2 sensor voltage vs air/fuel ratio? You're way too loose with your words. A narrow-band O2 sensor, in conjunction with pulling spark plugs and reading them to determine mixture, provides the evaluator enough information to determine quite accurate readings.
Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
If you wish to say, "A wide-band sensor gives a greater granularity of voltages vs air/fuel mixture than a narrow-band sensor and thus makes it easier to determine the actual mixture at various manifold pressures and rpms without the interpolation of the observer's judgement", say so. Don't make sweeping unsupported statements. You just confuse the newbs. :vash:
Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
"Guessing?" Bullshit again. Reading plugs; works great but is a pain in the ass. Narrow-band sensors; limited utility but easier to provide gross feedback that, when used with reading plugs and using the oil pressure gauge in the 1.6 liter NAs, provides amazingly accurate results. Wide-band; more costly for initial investment but makes up for it in saved labor and more accurate/comprehensive data-logging if your aftermarket ECU supports the wideband datalogging.
Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
"Real tuners"? "100% blind"? :jerkit: Save me from those who think they know everything...sometimes a little humility goes a long ways. Shops use a wideband because it reduces labor costs and reduces risk due to dyno operator inexperience. Hell, Shiv Pathak never used a wideband nor a knock sensor on "Frankenstein" (may it rest in peace) and still pulled 297 rwhp on a *stock* 1994 1.8 liter engine with only a Warner-Ishi RH5B with the T-bird compressor mod! When you match Shiv Pathak's numbers with the same constraints, I'll grant you the mantle of "Real Tuner". Until then, you get the title of "poseur" ( [poh-zur; Fr. paw-zœr] noun. a person who habitually pretends to be something he is not.)
Originally Posted by barryb
(Post 351485)
For whatever the fuck it's worth since I have virtually zero posts on this site...I've had a Miata since 1991 when I returned from the Saudi Arabian/Iraqi desert with a pocket full of combat pay. I've had forced induction since May of 1995 with one supercharger (Camden. Aarrgghh!) and four BEGI units (Warner-Ishi RH5B System 3 and System 3+ , T28 based FM2 equivalent, and the current custom T3/T04E system). I've used rising-rate fuel pressure regulators with MSD and J&S Safeguard (I dyno'd 189 rwhp on that one), standalone computers on the 1.6 liter with the T28 (219 rwhp dyno'd), and the current system (which I've never dyno'd 'cause I just don't feel like it; I've got more important things to do in my free time). Let's see...13 1/2 years of boost on both 1.6 and 1.8 liter engines, stock ECU and aftermarket ECU, approximately 260,000 miles of boost with ZERO engine failures! That's over 4300 HOURS(!) of run time from sea level to 14,000 feet. I repeat, ZERO engine failures and I've never owned a wide-band (I keep saying I'm gonna buy one).
I would also suggest you stop insulting me. In case you didn't notice, the last 5 replies to your post were sarcastic. I am willing to listen to what you have to say, since you seem reasonably knowledgeable, but you aren't the only person here who knows what they are talking about. |
yes, everyone drop the insults unless they are directed at Shiv.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands