Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

NA vs FI , before and after, low end talk.

Old 09-10-2007, 06:37 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mimime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 523
Total Cats: 0
Default NA vs FI , before and after, low end talk.

Just wondering whats your before and after performance (low end) Vaccum driving. Not the boosted portion.

Did anyone had a big difference after you turboed your car?
- lack of thottle responds?
- lost of power before boost?
Mimime is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 08:06 AM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

I feel less power b4 boost because my timing is now 8*, where as I had it at 16* b4 FI.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:05 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Zabac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
Default

interesting question for me since i never had boost, do you feel that is the only reason your feeling less power, and if you had some kind of EMU you could run 16* and have it retard at higher RPM, rigth...i mean please correct if im wrong, i am a newb at thie phenomena called boost(aka Nirvana)
Zabac is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:10 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mimime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 523
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by whaaamx5
interesting question for me since i never had boost, do you feel that is the only reason your feeling less power, and if you had some kind of EMU you could run 16* and have it retard at higher RPM, rigth...i mean please correct if im wrong, i am a newb at thie phenomena called boost(aka Nirvana)
I am adjusting my timing with EMB on the non boosted portion... still there is a trade off .. u will lose power and responds. How much power is lost? I can't reckon. It also depends on how your pipings are set up, intercooler size that's used.

Just want to see other's comments on this issue.
Mimime is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

Originally Posted by Mimime
Did anyone had a big difference after you turboed your car?

- lack of thottle responds?

- lost of power before boost?
+100rwhp difference.

no, didnt touch my throttle cable.

no.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:53 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mimime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 523
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
+100rwhp difference.

no, didnt touch my throttle cable.

no.

Please comment on your non boosted range.
Mimime is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 01:58 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Harv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shelton, CT
Posts: 675
Total Cats: 2
Default

Why is this even a question? Are you having trouble with your car?

Throttle response is the same. Power in vacuum is the same as I run 14 degrees timing and pull 6 with a Bipes. Once the turbo starts spooling (probably around 3000 and into boost at 4000) there is obviously more power.
Harv is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 02:21 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
db84drteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Total Cats: 1
Default

In my mind, it feels like the low end is better. I think it's because I finally got rid of the stock exhaust and catalytic converter as well as the stock intake arm/box and AFM.
db84drteg is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 02:38 PM
  #9  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

Originally Posted by Mimime
Please comment on your non boosted range.

it's barely out of boost, but it's completely transparent below the boost threshold.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 02:44 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

I felt like I picked up a little torque out of boost I would assume with the change in exhaust. Don't have anything other than my *** to back that up though.

Even with the slow spooling greddy turbo I'm not out of boost for very long.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 02:56 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Zabac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
Default

very interesting feedback...i was affraid that i may lose some pre-boost power since im in love with this lady called auto-x, and a significant loss of power in low RPM would make me mad...but based on what you guys are saying im no longer worried...damn im running out of excuses to boost my baby
Zabac is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 02:58 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Originally Posted by whaaamx5
very interesting feedback...i was affraid that i may lose some pre-boost power since im in love with this lady called auto-x, and a significant loss of power in low RPM would make me mad...but based on what you guys are saying im no longer worried...damn im running out of excuses to boost my baby
There are no excuses to not do it unless you consider class specification a problem.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 03:23 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Harv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shelton, CT
Posts: 675
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by whaaamx5
very interesting feedback...i was affraid that i may lose some pre-boost power since im in love with this lady called auto-x, and a significant loss of power in low RPM would make me mad...but based on what you guys are saying im no longer worried...damn im running out of excuses to boost my baby
The thing is, if you go with the Greddy as it is you're not going to be optimized for autocrossing because you do want the thing to spool up quicker. As it is with the stock downpipe and exhaust you're gonna get into boost around 4k rpm. If I were seriously going to autocross the car I would have the BEGI downpipe and a free flowing cat and exhaust. That is my next summer upgrade for the car actually as I want to get that boost going earlier.

In some tight corners on the course you'll be waiting for that boost to kick in with the stock setup.
Harv is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 03:48 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

A lot of the SM2 Miatas I used to autox with have pulled their turbos in favor of blowers.

Mimi - I felt a great loss of throttle response after installing my kit, but I blame that on going from 14* to 6* before I got, and later pulled, my bipes. The bipes allowed me to bump the timing back to 14* and I pulled to 10* (WI) in boost. That gave a lot of the low-end back.
kotomile is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 03:54 PM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

The turbo with out a doubt will make you faster around the cones. I went from a mid pack at best finisher to top 10 (RAW) after installing the turbo and going to v710s. With 13" wheels I have no problem being in boost a LOT. A few upgrades will make the td04 spool pretty damn good. Besides, when was the last time you spend any significant amount of time below 4K while autocrossing?

My big problem now is traction, but thats a FUN problem to have.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:03 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Zabac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
Default

sorry guys i just realized that this is the greddy section, ooops...
Harv-im not using a greaddy set up, im brewing something myself...i got carried away with such a great post...sorry again
kotomile-i was debating the two for a while, i AM going the snail way, lol
jayc72-im typically in the top 1/4 to 1/3 now on street tires, im not expecting to be the fastest, but i would really like it... top 10 would make me very happy...
Zabac is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:26 PM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

If you do go turbo for autox, make sure to keep spool/response/"linearity" in mind. Those three factors are what caused my Jax autox buddies to switch to Uberchargers vs their turbos. The turbos they selected weren't the quick-spooling kind, which didn't help at the Buccaneer Region's tight courses (a lot of club4AG influence down there).
kotomile is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 06:57 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Zabac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
Default

auto-x is not the only factor, even though probably the most important..
Zabac is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:14 PM
  #19  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,017
Total Cats: 6,587
Default

With proper fuel and timing control (EMU, MS, etc) as opposed to bandaids like static timing retard and 300cc injectors on the stock ECU/AFM, driveability with a turbo car in non-boosted conditions is 100% identical to stock. The turbo does not present a significant restriction to either intake or exhaust, and the fuel mixture and ignition timing should not be altered at all.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 08:31 PM
  #20  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

I did an autox with 100% miatas. I was the second faster time of the day and the only turbo miata. only one that beat me was a stock 06.
Braineack is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: NA vs FI , before and after, low end talk.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.