Originally Posted by jayc72
(Post 323369)
I really doubt it. In my experience the power delivery is completely different. I had a good DP on both my setups and used the same MBC, so a pretty close comparison. My "data" is all subjective so take my OPINION for what it's worth. I'll stand by what I said, the gt2554r is a better turbo for the 1.6 if you are interested in spool with autocross in mind.
Did you carry over the same actuator? |
Originally Posted by paul
(Post 323371)
well have to see what a gt2554r can do in 3 weeks on my 268,000 mile original 94 motor.
i was considering swapping in my new motor with 99 head before the dyno day but i'm really curious what it can do on a straight up beat ass 94 motor at 15psi |
Originally Posted by jayc72
(Post 323104)
Paul gets to be a dick in this situation because he has experience with at least one of the turbos. What experience gives you the right? When you start driving a turbo car then maybe you can inject some personal experience. Until then, shut the fuck up supercharger boy.
EDIT: Oh, you're Canadian. I understand now. |
Originally Posted by BenR
(Post 323374)
Did you carry over the same actuator?
ALL things being equal except the turbo itself, I'd wager a lot of money that the gt2554r is a faster spooling turbo. |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 323376)
Excuse me? I said I was no expert. I never injected any personal experience either as I don't have any. I even said that what I was saying was common knowledge which you seem to agree with. Why are you attacking me? I wasn't being disrespectful to you or anybody else. You have offended me.
EDIT: Oh, you're Canadian. I understand now. |
Cote FTL.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands