Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

motor mount hybrid mc/derlin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2014, 01:38 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Bobbygmf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -20
Default motor mount hybrid mc/derlin

i seen a old thread with someone talking about using a mazda comp mount on the driver side, and solid derlin on the passeger.

im wondering if anyone had any reviews on this.

i'm still leaning towards awr 75a mounts.
Bobbygmf is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 12-23-2014, 01:46 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

It's Delrin.

Don't make bad decisions.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 02:15 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,647
Total Cats: 3,009
Default

Delrin will make you have a bad day. AWR is all you will need if the comp ones won't hold your power.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 03:02 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mcfandango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 240
Total Cats: 5
Default

Take the wisdom from others that tried and skip delrin based mounts.
mcfandango is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 03:21 PM
  #5  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Delrin is a terrible choice for motor mount material.
Savington is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:58 PM
  #6  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Bobbygmf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -20
Default

Thank you for making it easy I'll just got with awr's
Bobbygmf is offline  
Old 12-24-2014, 12:47 PM
  #7  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Bobbygmf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -20
Default

Do awr move the position of the motor?
Bobbygmf is offline  
Old 12-24-2014, 09:38 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Bobbygmf
Do awr move the position of the motor?
Not intentionally.
Leafy is offline  
Old 12-27-2014, 02:45 AM
  #9  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

AWR Motor Mounts @ Trackspeed Engineering

In stock
Savington is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 09:19 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by Bobbygmf
Do awr move the position of the motor?

I believe the point is that they keep the position from moving.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 12:08 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

I can't imagine any need for stiffer mounts than AWR's at any level of race car. BP engine creates some serious vibration that will rattle bolts loose all over the chassis without some vibration Isolation and the AWR's have minimal amounts of vibration isolation already.

I just modified mine to move the engine 1.5" aft of the stock location in the car.
bbundy is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 04:49 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mcfandango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 240
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
I just modified mine to move the engine 1.5" aft of the stock location in the car.
Cut and weld the PPF? Or something else? Total thread drift I want to see it! I've got to ditch the CAS first but I'd love to do something similar.
mcfandango is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 05:02 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by mcfandango
Cut and weld the PPF? Or something else? Total thread drift I want to see it! I've got to ditch the CAS first but I'd love to do something similar.
Basically just drilled another hole and moved the PPF back one hole spacing where it mounts to the Diff. There is enough room at the firewall so no cutting is required. Shift hole in the trans tunnel needs a little bit of modification though. I ditched the CAS and had a custom drive shaft made.

I re-made the part of the AWR mount that bolts to the sub frame to accommodate the shift in engine location.
bbundy is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 06:24 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
glade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: albion, mi
Posts: 319
Total Cats: 17
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
Basically just drilled another hole and moved the PPF back one hole spacing where it mounts to the Diff. There is enough room at the firewall so no cutting is required. Shift hole in the trans tunnel needs a little bit of modification though. I ditched the CAS and had a custom drive shaft made.

I re-made the part of the AWR mount that bolts to the sub frame to accommodate the shift in engine location.
I second the request for photos, even of just the mounts, as this sounds like something I've been trying to figure out to do.

Sorry for the thread Jack
glade is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 06:34 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 270
Total Cats: 26
Default

+1 would love to see pics of bbundy's reduced polar moment engine location.
Ryephile is offline  
Old 12-30-2014, 12:53 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
mx5-kiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 992
Total Cats: 57
Default

continued thread drift....

Hopefully without sounding disparaging.....cause its a pretty cool mod.

I understand the theory of moving the engine closer to the centre of mass but do you have more concrete goals for the move?

i.e. improved feel, less body roll/ improve C of G, polar moment etc equating to faster lap times, better tyre wear....???

or just because it was a good idea and project at the time....

also, how do you remove the CAS? I hate all the extra crap bolted to the motor. removing the CAS seems like a good mod as well.

Last edited by mx5-kiwi; 12-30-2014 at 12:54 AM. Reason: a second thought...
mx5-kiwi is offline  
Old 12-30-2014, 03:23 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by mx5-kiwi
continued thread drift....

Hopefully without sounding disparaging.....cause its a pretty cool mod.

I understand the theory of moving the engine closer to the centre of mass but do you have more concrete goals for the move?

i.e. improved feel, less body roll/ improve C of G, polar moment etc equating to faster lap times, better tyre wear....???

or just because it was a good idea and project at the time....

also, how do you remove the CAS? I hate all the extra crap bolted to the motor. removing the CAS seems like a good mod as well.
I’m doing it because I think moving the engine back is better for polar moment and static weight distribution, it didn’t seem too hard or costly to do not counting my labor. Even with 275/35/15 A6 tires mounted on 11” wheels I’m straight line traction limited for a good bit of the powerband in second gear doing SCCA autocross so a bit more weight on the rear even small amounts helps. Heck even 10 to 20 lbs of aero makes a noticeable difference I have found.

It’s allowed to do this in the class I’m running as long as the firewall is not modified for clearance of head or block. Technically clearance for the CAS would be legal however as well as a motor swap to anything Mazda ever put in any model production car. With the stock motor you might get 2” before hitting the firewall with the head or block.

I’m moving the driver back with the drivetrain as well as front swaybar and probably radiator. So I think I might notice a difference.

As far as removing the CAS, NB Miatas came stock without A CAS. They used a crank trigger at the front engine behind the damper and a small cam sensor in the front of the valve cover on NB1 and on top of the valve cover on an NB2 and just had a plug where the NA CAS was. I’m going to be using a 36-2 crank trigger and a 99 NB1 cam trigger for engine management.

I chose 1.5” because it seemed easy. Just flipped the hole pattern at the back end of the PPF and cut off the excess.

Attached Thumbnails motor mount hybrid mc/derlin-20141229_184046-1200x900-.jpg   motor mount hybrid mc/derlin-130154d1419927814-motor-mount-hybrid-mc-derlin-20141229_184046-1200x900-.jpg  
bbundy is offline  
Old 12-30-2014, 07:47 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
mx5-kiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 992
Total Cats: 57
Default

Cool, it'll be interesting to hear your post mod feel of the change.
mx5-kiwi is offline  
Old 12-31-2014, 11:58 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
99mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,647
Total Cats: 524
Default

Looks like this mod will also eliminate the space needed for a coolant reroute and possibly the coil packs for those that still use the stock ones.
99mx5 is offline  
Old 12-31-2014, 12:02 PM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,647
Total Cats: 3,009
Default

Bob, Did it involve shortening the driveshaft?
sixshooter is offline  


Quick Reply: motor mount hybrid mc/derlin



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.