Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Easy changes to static corner weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #1  
doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608
Total Cats: 817
From: Columbus, OH
Default Easy changes to static corner weight?

What are the easiest components to move around in a miata to adjust static corner weight? Are there many? Or better yet; are there any that are specific to a miata?

- Ballast
- Battery
- Fuel cell if applicable
- Catch cans/overflow tanks
- ??


Ive heard the tall tales of SM drivers using large batteries and 10lb shock mounts on the rr.

What are y'all doing to improve right rear %?
Old Mar 3, 2012 | 01:16 PM
  #2  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Nothing. My RR is crazy light, something in the 450lb range. I'd always rather have less overall weight than trying to load up the RR with junk. I still have 50/50 crossweights, though. Anything else on that corner (battery, overflow, etc) requires that you run a bunch of line or cable back to it, which adds weight. My battery is in the passenger footwell (as God intended it), and it vastly reduced the amount of cable required to hook it up to everything.
Old Mar 4, 2012 | 08:34 PM
  #3  
Seefo's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,961
Total Cats: 48
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

remove weight from one side, add ballast weight there based on your classing. Otherwise, there is not much to move around without adding weight to another area (ie wires, or cabling, or tubing, etc.). Its probably better to be lighter and do the rest through corner balancing with the ride height than to add extra weight just to improve the unsprung weight distribution.
Old Mar 4, 2012 | 08:46 PM
  #4  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Spare tire? Remove the actual tire if it's too much.
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 07:08 AM
  #5  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Choose a RHD one to begin with
No exhaust near you feet, near your brake MS, etc etc.
I have a spare one, just in case I crash the tub I'm running now (fooling Murphy ).

If caged a plastic drivers door (GF or CF doesn't matter) would help a lot. But as mentioned, overall weight seems to be more important than balance as long as yu can reach the desired CW.

Lighter driver...
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 09:49 AM
  #6  
damir130's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 6
Default

Ton (the 8min BTG guy) told me about some experiments he did on an old Volvo rally car. Basically running stages with and without ballast weight in the trunk to get F/R distribution back to spec. I remember the results as the car being equally quick because the car was easier to extract speed from with improved weight balance. After seeing his datalogs for the Nordschleiffe (0.83% max variation between hot laps over 20km) I tend to trust the repeatability of his experiments.

Anyone else out there that did comparisons? I'm sure both configs are driveable, but could image L/R distribution having a different influence then F/R distribution.
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #7  
AnnorexicRoadster's Avatar
!!! NOT CONFIRMED !!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by damir130
Ton (the 8min BTG guy) told me about some experiments he did on an old Volvo rally car. Basically running stages with and without ballast weight in the trunk to get F/R distribution back to spec. I remember the results as the car being equally quick because the car was easier to extract speed from with improved weight balance. After seeing his datalogs for the Nordschleiffe (0.83% max variation between hot laps over 20km) I tend to trust the repeatability of his experiments.

Anyone else out there that did comparisons? I'm sure both configs are driveable, but could image L/R distribution having a different influence then F/R distribution.
With the same shocks and springs I would agree. But to say a lighter car cannot have its suspension adjusted to work with the lighter rear and actually produce faster times is wrong.

If that were the case every Porsche would have an anvil in its front luggage compartment, and last time I checked thats not even a dealer option. If you know a bit about porsche you'd know if they can make it a option and charge you money they most certainly will.
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by AnnorexicRoadster
If that were the case every Porsche would have an anvil in its front luggage compartment, and last time I checked thats not even a dealer option. If you know a bit about porsche you'd know if they can make it a option and charge you money they most certainly will.
Some models in the 70s had a "lead" front bumper ...
And 911s are a special case, balanced by tire width, trailing arms and whatnot

The Miata is not as unbalanced as other track victims are when they get lightened. Some local E30's have been faster in a competitive series by going 20lbs over min weight just to get balanced, but then they were prohibited from moving things around too much.
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 01:48 PM
  #9  
damir130's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 6
Default

Not interested in theoretical CR debates. Interested more in hearing experiences from people that have tried different things (which seemingly happens a lot in spec miata).

Porsches are pretty much near an ideal @ 40-60, totally different from anything you'll encounter in a miata. Not sure what point you are arguing?
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 03:23 PM
  #10  
AnnorexicRoadster's Avatar
!!! NOT CONFIRMED !!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by damir130
Not interested in theoretical CR debates. Interested more in hearing experiences from people that have tried different things (which seemingly happens a lot in spec miata).

Porsches are pretty much near an ideal @ 40-60, totally different from anything you'll encounter in a miata. Not sure what point you are arguing?
Point I'm arguing is that is it better to be lighter then perfectly balanced. Unless you have a minimum weight that you have to make and are currently too light for your class there is no point in throwing weight back into your car.

Spec miata guys do it because they have a minimum weight to stay legal. In this case, and especially since they cannot change spring rates/damper rates corner ballasting is effective.

Savington's black car is very light in the rear and especially on the rear right corner but that doesn't mean he is going to throw weight back into the car.

Every FWD race car is gutted in the rear and no one leaves any weight in the back because light is faster.

Make your suspension work for your front rear weights and when you get a alignment invest the extra cash and get it corner balanced with you in the car.
Old Mar 5, 2012 | 03:26 PM
  #11  
AnnorexicRoadster's Avatar
!!! NOT CONFIRMED !!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
Some models in the 70s had a "lead" front bumper ...
And 911s are a special case, balanced by tire width, trailing arms and whatnot

The Miata is not as unbalanced as other track victims are when they get lightened. Some local E30's have been faster in a competitive series by going 20lbs over min weight just to get balanced, but then they were prohibited from moving things around too much.
To add to your point, the "lead bumper" was a compromise. Then Porsche engineers focused on modifying the suspension as you mentioned to get the car to work with the rear heavy setup.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
Oct 26, 2018 11:00 PM
asmasm
Build Threads
82
May 26, 2016 04:37 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.