Help!! My Intake Valves Keep Wearing Out!
#103
This is a throw in the dark that may or may not help.
I raced at national level open class Motocross so had a new bike a year for many years..... The first Honda CRF450's had titanium valves and some bikes ate valves. for ages no one could figure it out, turns out a faulty air filter seal let dirt in BUT when mechanics replaced the valves they were lapping in new ones.
These would then fail causing poor starting/no starting within 10-12 hours.
Eventually it was realized that the common practice of lapping valves was not ideal for titanium valves as it was wearing through the required surface hardness...Honda eventually released a Service Bulletin specifically not to do this.
Probably NOT an issue here but in the interests of a weird solution for a weird problem I put it out there....possibly am repeating myself as well....(im old, have a 6 month baby...so no sleep and no memory at this point )
I raced at national level open class Motocross so had a new bike a year for many years..... The first Honda CRF450's had titanium valves and some bikes ate valves. for ages no one could figure it out, turns out a faulty air filter seal let dirt in BUT when mechanics replaced the valves they were lapping in new ones.
These would then fail causing poor starting/no starting within 10-12 hours.
Eventually it was realized that the common practice of lapping valves was not ideal for titanium valves as it was wearing through the required surface hardness...Honda eventually released a Service Bulletin specifically not to do this.
Probably NOT an issue here but in the interests of a weird solution for a weird problem I put it out there....possibly am repeating myself as well....(im old, have a 6 month baby...so no sleep and no memory at this point )
#104
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Basically, I switched machine shops when I rebuilt my latest head. It's running fine with no issues. It is all-OEM with the exception of ST light doubles.
I think my earlier problem was improper valve seat machining. It ate a set of OEM intakes and a set of ST SS intakes.
I think my earlier problem was improper valve seat machining. It ate a set of OEM intakes and a set of ST SS intakes.
#105
Thanks Rick that is what I'm planning of doing this time but use the inconel exhaust. Atleast it sounds like you solved your setup. I wonder if on your original head valve job that grinding the valves lowered the spring pressure somewhat as the valves sat lower in the seats after gring both and the machine shop didn't check the spring pressure thinking it was just a normal valve job. I have ran a pure stock head for 4 years on a 247 whp setup with no issues so I'm hopeful that doing something similar to what you did well fix things.
Do you know what the seat width ended up being and the spring pressure? Thanks
Do you know what the seat width ended up being and the spring pressure? Thanks
#107
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
I specifically told the second machine shop to make the seats fat. He did .060 which is the top of the Mazda specification. He also carefully checked the seat pressures but I can't remember what the setup was (North of 70#'s IIRC). Didn't Savington make a recommendation somewhere in here?
Also, keep in mind that my car is normally aspirated. With boost, you need to compensate for the tendency of boost to keep the intake valves open and add a bit more seat pressure (basically, shim to add (intake valve face area in in^2 x psi) to the seat pressure).
We did no other work on the head. It was a low-mileage core and was in really good shape when torn down.
The first machine shop sandblasted the head and left grit in the oil passages. That should give you an idea of their QC.
Also, keep in mind that my car is normally aspirated. With boost, you need to compensate for the tendency of boost to keep the intake valves open and add a bit more seat pressure (basically, shim to add (intake valve face area in in^2 x psi) to the seat pressure).
We did no other work on the head. It was a low-mileage core and was in really good shape when torn down.
The first machine shop sandblasted the head and left grit in the oil passages. That should give you an idea of their QC.
#108
I specifically told the second machine shop to make the seats fat. He did .060 which is the top of the Mazda specification. He also carefully checked the seat pressures but I can't remember what the setup was (North of 70#'s IIRC). Didn't Savington make a recommendation somewhere in here?
Also, keep in mind that my car is normally aspirated. With boost, you need to compensate for the tendency of boost to keep the intake valves open and add a bit more seat pressure (basically, shim to add (intake valve face area in in^2 x psi) to the seat pressure).
We did no other work on the head. It was a low-mileage core and was in really good shape when torn down.
The first machine shop sandblasted the head and left grit in the oil passages. That should give you an idea of their QC.
Also, keep in mind that my car is normally aspirated. With boost, you need to compensate for the tendency of boost to keep the intake valves open and add a bit more seat pressure (basically, shim to add (intake valve face area in in^2 x psi) to the seat pressure).
We did no other work on the head. It was a low-mileage core and was in really good shape when torn down.
The first machine shop sandblasted the head and left grit in the oil passages. That should give you an idea of their QC.
quick math for you guys:
33mm stock diameter intake valve, 6mm stem diameter, 20lbs boost.
valve area - stem area =
855.3 mm^2 - 28.27 mm^2 = 827.03 mm^2 = 1.2819 in^2
Loss of seat pressure = area * pressure = 1.2819 in^2 * 20 lb/in = 25.63 lb of spring pressure LOST due to boost.
That's a lot, and that's only 20 PSI boost. This is why I run heavy double valve springs, because I run high boost.
#110
Data point. Not supertech, but Manley valves. Take it for what it's worth.
Manley +1 intake (and exhaust)
stock-spec widths valve grind pretty sure 5-angle. Need to find my paperwork.
Stock bp4w shim over buckets
Stock bp4w seats
Supertech heavy doubles
no boost, but just under 8k miles of no ***** given revving to 8k+ (soft 8k, hard 8200)
Soon to see lots of boost, but 7200 rev limiter.
Still at same lash specs as when I installed them.
Manley +1 intake (and exhaust)
stock-spec widths valve grind pretty sure 5-angle. Need to find my paperwork.
Stock bp4w shim over buckets
Stock bp4w seats
Supertech heavy doubles
no boost, but just under 8k miles of no ***** given revving to 8k+ (soft 8k, hard 8200)
Soon to see lots of boost, but 7200 rev limiter.
Still at same lash specs as when I installed them.
#111
I understand what everyone is saying and knew that running boost was creating pressure behind the valves as that is pretty basic. I still think it has something to do with the metallurgy of the ss valves for the conditions they are seeing. I run 16 psi on most of the track, hit the porsche button and go to 18-19 psi down the straights so I would think brand new dbl lites with the oem shim in should be enough spring pressure. I well have it checked this time. What makes me think this, I have run a stock head with stock oem springs and never had an issue.
I called a guy who used to do my work before we moved to Or. and he does lots of race motors and he said there is 3 things that well wear the valve seat face.
1. Too little spring pressure
2. Too much spring pressure
3. HEAT
As stated in a previous post I suspect nbr. 3 with the ST intake valves. The setup gets pretty hot in 20 to 30 minute track sessions. It doesn't seem to effect the oem intakes,
just burns the oem exhaust after quite awhile.
Thanks everyone for your replys. To be continued
I called a guy who used to do my work before we moved to Or. and he does lots of race motors and he said there is 3 things that well wear the valve seat face.
1. Too little spring pressure
2. Too much spring pressure
3. HEAT
As stated in a previous post I suspect nbr. 3 with the ST intake valves. The setup gets pretty hot in 20 to 30 minute track sessions. It doesn't seem to effect the oem intakes,
just burns the oem exhaust after quite awhile.
Thanks everyone for your replys. To be continued
#118
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 1,234
Total Cats: 283
The issue isn't keeping the tappet in contact with the lobe of the cam (traditional thought of valve float), it's keeping the valve firmly on it's seat the instant it closes and not "fluttering" or "bouncing" on the seat for several degrees of crankshaft rotation. That "flutter" or "bounce" will effectively "lap" the valve seat to the point of the seat cupping.
It's pretty simple and not sure why you have a hard time understating it.
It's pretty simple and not sure why you have a hard time understating it.
#120
Dunno what happened, but I wrote a reply and it's not here. Short version, there are high dollar valves out there that may be a better valve than the supertechs if you're willing to spend the $$$ on them. Most race cars I've seen run something other than supertech valves, though they are popular in the miata world.