Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire Wear (More inside or outside?)

Old 05-18-2011, 05:16 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
timg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 0
Default Tire Wear (More inside or outside?)

So I have a set of old RA1's (yes old) that have one edge worn significantly more than the other. These didn't come off my Miata (I'm a poor tire beggar!)

What I'm wondering is, should I put these on my Miata with the worn edge inside or outside? Here my Miata setup:

- koni yellow, 550F / 340R
- hollow RB bar up front, no rear bar
- ~1.5 front camber, 1.25 rear camber
- zero toe front/rear

Thanks
timg is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:53 PM
  #2  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

if you run too much camber, put that edge on the outside.

if you run too little camber, put it on the inside.
y8s is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:55 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
timg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 0
Default

I am guessing that it is difficult to get 'too much' camber at ~12.75" ride height and stock arms. So put the worn edge on the inside?

Tim
timg is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:58 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
spitefulcheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 3
Default

just a quick note.....you should be running more rear camber than front and a little bit of toe in on all four ends for handling purposes.

I think with the camber you're running, put them inside
spitefulcheerio is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:59 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

I'd say what is more important to consider is how much toe you're running. Thats the true killer of tires (as far as the inside/outside argument). You probably still want to run the worn edge on the outside regardless though.

I've heard that running tires in the incorrect rotation direction periodically will help them wear evenly as well.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 06:00 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by spitefulcheerio
just a quick note.....you should be running more rear camber than front and a little bit of toe in on all four ends for handling purposes.

I think with the camber you're running, put them inside
You are just flat out wrong and must be called out. I'll let someone else take it from here.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 06:03 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
spitefulcheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 3
Default

lol I'm going by what other people have told me. My alignment is setup for autox, by what others have told me.

Front:
-1.1 camber
5 caster
1/32" toe in

Rear:
-1.75 rear
1/32" toe in

I'd actually like to know where I'm wrong so I can change it though....
spitefulcheerio is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 01:19 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

I run a lot more rear than front, by memory its about 2 front 2.5 or 3 deg camber rear.

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 05:35 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
sixace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gainesville, Tx
Posts: 227
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
You are just flat out wrong and must be called out. I'll let someone else take it from here.
Let me try. (From 949 site):

>=12" front ride height (measured hub center to fender)

>=4.5" front ride height measured at forward most straight section of pinch weld with 205/50/15 or 225/45/15 tires

Front camber: -2* (or as close as you can get to it)
Caster: +3.75 to +4.25*
Front total toe: 0

Rear camber : -1.8*
Front total toe: 0

<=12.0"

3.75~ 4.25" front ride height measured at forward most straight section of pinch weld with 205/50/15 or 225/45/15 tires

Front camber: -2.8* (or as close as you can get to it)
Caster: +2.75 to +3.5*
Front total toe: 0

Rear camber : -2.5*
Front total toe: 0




Works for me (I use the second setup)..

PS, I'd mount the worn edges on the "outside".
sixace is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 05:44 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
timg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thanks guys, it really seems like it is a bit of a crap shoot on what side to mount the worn edges. I don't really have a bunch of camber and no toe, so inside wear should be low.. but there is also good camber gain through the travel so outside wear should be low as well.

So relatively even wear.. which means these tires won't last me all that long, ha (worn edges will wear too.. eventually cording).

Thanks
timg is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 04:11 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
 
jacob300zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 145
Default

Get more camber and put the worn edges on the inside always.
jacob300zx is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 08:36 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
sixace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gainesville, Tx
Posts: 227
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jacob300zx
Get more camber and put the worn edges on the inside always.
Curious as to why worn on the inside? I try and get even wear, but always end up with slightly more wear on the insides. All the ax crew usually end up flipping the tires on the wheels to get the worn insides to the outside to extend life..

plz edumacate me.
sixace is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 07:17 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Pitlab77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,914
Total Cats: 5
Default

the toe in will make it twitchy. Ok for AutoX but not for high speed stuff.
Pitlab77 is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 07:57 AM
  #14  
Want fries with that?
iTrader: (3)
 
rider384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 2,011
Total Cats: 2
Default

~12" ride height:
Rear camber: -2.0
Front camber: -2.2
Front Castor: 5.0
Rear toe-out: +0.125"

Last edited by rider384; 05-20-2011 at 09:02 AM.
rider384 is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 07:58 AM
  #15  
Want fries with that?
iTrader: (3)
 
rider384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 2,011
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by sixace
Curious as to why worn on the inside? I try and get even wear, but always end up with slightly more wear on the insides. All the ax crew usually end up flipping the tires on the wheels to get the worn insides to the outside to extend life..

plz edumacate me.
More camber means there's more weight resting on the inside edge of the wheel. More weight on it means more wear.
rider384 is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 08:02 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
sixace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gainesville, Tx
Posts: 227
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rider384
More camber means there's more weight resting on the inside edge of the wheel. More weight on it means more wear.
Uh yeah, I get that. The question was why would someone mount used tires with the worn edge on the inside edge. Try and keep up.

btw, you run more neg camber on the rear than front?
sixace is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:02 AM
  #17  
Want fries with that?
iTrader: (3)
 
rider384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 2,011
Total Cats: 2
Default

Had it backwards, -2.2 is front and -2.0 is rear

And I know that, of course I knew that...
rider384 is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:12 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
spitefulcheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 3
Default

I still don't understand what more rear camber is bad...my alignment setup is for autox. I spoke to a couple of auotx vets and they said my setup was a good streetable autox alignment
spitefulcheerio is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:16 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,390
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by sixace
Uh yeah, I get that. The question was why would someone mount used tires with the worn edge on the inside edge.
With a less than optimal setup you might be camber limited and wear the outer shoulders harder (yeah, I know you leave some perf on the table this way but hey, we all started somewhere), then there is nothing wrong in putting the most rubber where the wear is the hardest.

Back in my learner years I ran a 03 with just Yellow Konis and "old FM-springs". I needed to flip the tires twice to make the most of the rubber. With the modified LCAs (moved lower ball joint) and the -3.2 I run now the wear is even and I can just move wheels according to the wear at the track (LF is always punished the most on our tracks).
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:17 AM
  #20  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,488
Total Cats: 4,077
Default

Originally Posted by spitefulcheerio
you should be running more rear camber than front and a little bit of toe in on all four ends for handling purposes.

Do not let spitefulcheerio do your alignment.
Braineack is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tire Wear (More inside or outside?)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.