Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Am I crazy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default Am I crazy?

So I'm building a motor with a Miata head and gtx bottom end so 7.8:1 CR. Everybody on my local forum is saying the car is going to drive like *** low speed no boost, and that I will want to tear my engine apart ad put in higher CR pistons? What do you guys think?
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #2  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

It will definitely not have as much response down low. You are trading that for safety/cushion space in boost.

If you know what you're doing tuning wise you can definitely gain back a bunch of the lowend with good spark tuning.

I don't think it will be nearly as bad as they say it is. Just me though


*edit: it would also help us help you if you listed the whole setup including turbo specs. a huge laggy turbo and a small quick spooling turbo will only amplify the effects of teh low compression, for worse or for better respectively.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

2560 ball bearing, ms2 diypnp w/ebc, 99-00 265cc injectors, lc1,vtps, gtx rods/pistons, new bearings all over and rings. goal of max 200-220whp
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #4  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I don't see the need for such low compression with such modest power goals, but it doesn't hurt. Should you want to step it up later you'll have the headroom.

Why not just refresh the stock long block, throw in some rods and call it a day at 9.1:1?
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #5  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by JEMERY
2560 ball bearing, ms2 diypnp w/ebc, 99-00 265cc injectors, lc1,vtps, gtx rods/pistons, new bearings all over and rings. goal of max 200-220whp
Those pistons I sold you are going to be woefully wasted at that power level.

The only reason to run compression that low is if you plan on running 20+PSI on pump gas with no meth. I myself hit 240 at the wheels with stock 9.4:1 pistons, and I know of several other 1.6 guys on this forum that have made that much or more.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
baron340's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 577
Total Cats: 13
From: Lompoc, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JEMERY
99-00 265cc injectors
Everything else sounds good as far as I know.. but these injectors seem pretty small for 200 HP. Better to step up and run less duty cycle.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #7  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

My plan is to start small and after some more time and money going higher but I want to do it while I'm in there. Later going for rx8 secondarys and a fuel pump maybe some better spark then 250-280.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #8  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Why secondaries and not just bigger injectors?
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by BenR
Why secondaries and not just bigger injectors?
Rotary engines tend to use staged injection. The secondary injectors are generally larger.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #10  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

450cc's yellow body
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #11  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

FWIW I am putting miata pistons in my GTX. Think about off boost drivability, spool and overall power. 9.4:1 is seriously going to be a better choice for your application and miata pistons are cheap.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #12  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

With that small a turbo you won't be off boost as much as guys with a big one. I wouldn't worry about it much. I've run the difference on Desktop Dyno in the past and it is only a scant few foot lbs of torque difference on our little engines. As it has been stated many times in the past, power is only a downshift away. I'd rather have the headroom for the future.

You might even be able to get away with running 87 octane at low boost levels!
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #13  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff_Ciesielski
Rotary engines tend to use staged injection. The secondary injectors are generally larger.


Doesn't make sense, unless he means that he will replace the current injectors with a set of secondary injectors from an rx8.


I'm sure I'm just daft.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Old Oct 21, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #15  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

I really want the big power but seeing as "I'm in school its not feasible right now'' Fiance's words not mine, I think I will go for the low compression and when I can afford the extra add-ons to make 300+whp I will buy them. 7.8:1 will be slow going from the get go but it will scream at 20+ psi 93+octane. Thanks for the advice and opinions everyone. I'm always open to opinions.
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #16  
Johnny2Bad's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 29
Total Cats: 5
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
Default

Personally, I see compression as "free horsepower" on naturally aspirated engines but with forced induction it's really just a matter of managing all the parameters.

I understand the school that says a piston swap is easy and can be cheap when the engine is apart and pays dividends forever but everyone has different needs.

I see a guy who is in school, has no real "extra" money, is carving out a place for his "hobby" with a future wife (which you have to do, or there won't be a hobby), probably needs a working car no matter what and might want to take a few drives in the summer away from the easy availability of quality high octane gasoline.

Luckily the Miata is a free revving engine out of the box, so he won't have to spend money to actually use the higher power band.

Seems like a sensible tradeoff. In particular, an engine grenade experience is definitely going to force him to dig in with the future wife, who may be the most sweet, understanding woman on Earth, but has other ideas about what a family's priorities should be. Not her fault, just the way it usually is. Better the whole thing is painless, with no surprises, so I say conservative is fine. For now.
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #17  
JEMERY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Total Cats: -1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

Yeah, I'm building it for big things but, for the time being + some, it will do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d k
Race Prep
39
Mar 5, 2016 06:45 PM
babydriver
Meet and Greet
10
Nov 12, 2015 12:53 AM
elesjuan
Build Threads
7
Nov 3, 2015 01:51 PM
concealer404
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
8
Sep 17, 2015 12:04 PM
AlwaysBroken
Engine Performance
5
Sep 6, 2015 12:53 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.