Notices
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Increasing rear grip...options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default Increasing rear grip...options?

Coming out of a corner getting on the gas my car feels loose. 28 front bar and 12 rear 550/325 springs. Otherwise the car feels pretty good. I could add 3mm packers to the front shocks...would that improve weight transfer to the rear? I could add the 3mm packers to the rear which would increase spring rate as the rear springs compress but I think that would increase oversteer. I could add a bit toe in at the rear at next alignment and I could increase the rear negative camber. Does increasing the rear negative camber increase rear grip? On my street car I've got .5 degree more negative camber at the rear vs the front and the car feels more stable on track.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #2  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Try removing your rear bar.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

remove rear bar winner!

suspension tuning 101:
softer = more traction
harder = less traction

you can either make the grippy end less grippy or make the slippery end less slippery.

Note that in more advanced lessons, this does not always apply.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Differential. OMFG my green car hooks on exit.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Less rear ride height, less front rebound. Don't bandaid it with toe changes. When was the last time the car was cornerweighted and/or aligned? What does the tire pyrometer say?
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Less rear ride height, less front rebound. Don't bandaid it with toe changes. When was the last time the car was cornerweighted and/or aligned? What does the tire pyrometer say?
Ride height at the pinch welds is pretty much even front and rear about 5 1/4 inches, I know lower is better but I have to be able to get it in my trailer. Shocks are SD Bilsteins so no rebound adjustability.

I'm not sure it's a differential issue as the 1.8 track car has a VLSD and the street car has a 1.6 with an open, granted, the 1.8 has gobs more torque.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

With those spring rates you might actually be on the bump stop with the outside rear in the corner, giving you an artificially high spring rate at the rear. Check the travel with the zip tie method before changing a bunch of things.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 01:39 PM
  #8  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Bump the power down.
Reply
Leave a poscat -2 Leave a negcat
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 02:01 PM
  #9  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,692
Total Cats: 902
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
Bump the power down.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #10  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
Ride height at the pinch welds is pretty much even front and rear about 5 1/4 inches, I know lower is better but I have to be able to get it in my trailer. Shocks are SD Bilsteins so no rebound adjustability.

I'm not sure it's a differential issue as the 1.8 track car has a VLSD and the street car has a 1.6 with an open, granted, the 1.8 has gobs more torque.

The Viscous LSD is the 1.6 LSD. Are you sure you have two failboat diffs in your car? Or do you have a torsen in the 1.8 race car?

There's a little table I posted long ago from a book I read even longer ago about oversteer and understeer. Basically what the others have said, but it includes tire pressure, tire grip, spring rates, sway bar rates, downforce, and other things, and whether or not they increase oversteer or understeer when you increase/decrease them. Hopefully that sentence made sense.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #11  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
With those spring rates you might actually be on the bump stop with the outside rear in the corner, giving you an artificially high spring rate at the rear. Check the travel with the zip tie method before changing a bunch of things.
This idea occurred to me as the track car has NB mounts and the street car has 1 inch ISC mounts.

The track car has a 99 1.8 swap with the stock 4.3 VLSD and the street car has the open diff.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 09:35 PM
  #12  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,182
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Better throttle control. Oh, and no rear bar.


INB4 datalogs.
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 11:43 PM
  #13  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

After crawling under the cars it's obvious that the street car with ISC top hats has more shock travel before contacting the bumpstops, probably 3/4 of an inch more. Since the setup is basically the same between both cars I'm going to try different top hats in the rear of the track car and see if that solves the issue.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Sep 28, 2013 | 06:22 AM
  #14  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

You can effectively get the feel of no rear bar by disconnecting one end of one end link and tying it out of the way. I would do this before anything else as it is a very easy experiment.
Old Sep 28, 2013 | 08:37 AM
  #15  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Check the sag like you said. If the bump stops are hitting on corner exit (and the fronts are not hitting at the same time) the rear will get loose, maybe very loose depending on the stiffness of the bump stops. If this is what is going on, you need to fix the sag before you try anything else. Removing the rear sway will not help.

If it is the bump stops, I have seen this before and you will go nuts trying to correct this until you increase the sag.
Old Sep 28, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #16  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,155
Total Cats: 3,536
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

^He's right. Less rear bar would make it much worse if you are hitting the stops. More rear spring or more rear bar is the answer if you can't readily add travel.

My car is pretty neutral with 550/350 and FM sways (25mm full stiff/17?mm full soft) and ISC hats. You have more front bar, less rear bar, less rear spring, and less travel. I could see where you would get enough body roll to get hard against the stops.
Old Sep 28, 2013 | 04:58 PM
  #17  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

The bumpstops came with the shocks. They were cut down to 36mm. I'm guessing that they ramp up much faster than the 46mm ones on the street car.

Also, I crawled under the car and with NA Bilsteins I can slip one finger between the top of the front shock and the bumpstop so the amount of lowering left at the front is very little. Since I'm running at a very rough track any more lowering at the front probably isn't a good idea.

Last edited by wannafbody; Sep 29, 2013 at 06:18 PM.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 02:11 AM
  #18  
alik's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 330
Total Cats: 14
From: Boston / '90 Mariner Blue
Default

It's like he's not even listening.
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
wannafbody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

More rear bar won't work as I already had a 15mm rear swaybar and it was even looser than with the 12mm swaybar.

The front bumpstops should be engaging before the rear bumpstops as I have a 3mm spacer up front.

Last edited by wannafbody; Oct 4, 2013 at 09:30 PM.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 09:53 PM
  #20  
ozbrock's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Total Cats: 40
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Pretty sure most of the people posting in this thread are telling you LESS rear bar, not more.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.