Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

What did you Torque your ARP Head Studs to?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default What did you Torque your ARP Head Studs to?

I've read the threads here about them, seems some are going with 48, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, some follow the directions and go to 80....

What are you running? What is best?

I believe I just lifted the head with stock bolts at 60. I'm thinking put the ARPs in and go to 60 maybe 65. What works best?
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 10:30 PM
  #2  
albertogti117's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 167
Total Cats: 4
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Curious as well. I just torqued my ARP's to 65 based on previous threads (Savington said he torques his to 65 iirc). My motor is not in my car yet so I can't comment on if it works well or not.
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
Chooofoojoo's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 458
Total Cats: 40
From: Denver, Co.
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Not as curious as you might think. IIRC it was FM who worked with ARP to get those studs made. Their original torque spec was 49ft.lbs, which matched the factory clamp load. When I bought my first set in 2009, the instructions said 65ft.lbs, so that's what I did. I installed several sets at that setting before looking at a fresh set of instructions somewhere around 2011-2012, and to my surprise they said 80ft.lbs. A little forum reading turned up Bob's experiences with cracked heads at 80ft.lbs. Clearly, the engineer at ARP who said 49 is no longer there, and ARP doesn't care enough to put thought into their specs beyond "X diameter + Y thread pitch = Z torque".

I torque ARP studs to 65ft.lbs.
As it be said, as it be done.

Edit : Here's the thread with all the info : ARP Hear Stud Question [sic]
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 10:42 PM
  #4  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

Just bolted my head on, I believe I went with 55. Maybee two miles on it so far so don't take my word for it..
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 11:28 PM
  #5  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

65
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 09:34 PM
  #6  
guttedmiata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

Went 80 the first time. No issues. Chickened out the second time and went 65.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 09:59 AM
  #7  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

65 here too. no issues
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 11:28 AM
  #8  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

There's another sheet in the ARP box that says 60ft/lbs for 10mm IIRC, I went with that. In fact I torque rods, mains, and head studs all to 60ft/lbs.
Old May 7, 2015 | 02:19 PM
  #9  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Well thank you guys, looks like 65 seems fairly well accepted. I'll use that.
Old May 8, 2015 | 07:42 PM
  #10  
jmann's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 17
From: Grants Pass, OR.
Default

I torgue mine to 65# also, but I use the OEM washers. I was working with Bob on his engine when the issue happened and we thought the smaller OD washers from ARP was also a contributing factor.
Old May 8, 2015 | 09:07 PM
  #11  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Yeap I will definitely use the OEM washers as they are larger than the ones supplied by ARP. I'm also gonna check if I can stack the ARP washers on top of the OEM washer, if that appears any better.
Old May 8, 2015 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
jmann's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 17
From: Grants Pass, OR.
Default

I don't see any reason why you couldn't, but I don't think it is necessary, anyway I haven't.
Old May 9, 2015 | 12:10 PM
  #13  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by jmann
. I was working with Bob on his engine when the issue happened and we thought the smaller OD washers from ARP was also a contributing factor.
Which issue was this?
Old May 9, 2015 | 12:16 PM
  #14  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

80 psi will dig the ARP washers into the head. Go with 60~65
Old May 9, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #15  
jmann's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 17
From: Grants Pass, OR.
Default

The issue was that the washers were sucked down into the head and cracked it. I wouldn't use the ARP ones even at 65#.
Old May 9, 2015 | 01:27 PM
  #16  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

I've done 4 sets now at 60 lbs, no issues so far. Arp washers with their lube on both sides.
Old May 9, 2015 | 03:46 PM
  #17  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Question for you guys. If you use the ARPs with their supplied lube, and torque to 60 ft*lbs, how much additional clamping force would you get over using the factory bolts with regular motor oil?

My guess is you probably gain 4-5% from having finer threads, then you probably gain quite a bit from using the low friction lube, my guess would be 20% or more for the same torque. Also the advantage of studs vs bolts, I'm guessing you're looking at probably 25-30% more "clamp force" for the same torque when you add it all up. What do you guys think?
Old May 9, 2015 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by jmann
The issue was that the washers were sucked down into the head and cracked it. I wouldn't use the ARP ones even at 65#.
Interesting.

When I changed the head gasket on my '92, I used ARP studs with their lube torqued to their spec, and I'm pretty sure I used their washers.

Never heard of this problem before.
Old May 10, 2015 | 11:18 AM
  #19  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I've lost count of the number of heads I've put on engines with ARP studs and washers at 65ft.lb. No issues
Old May 10, 2015 | 11:29 AM
  #20  
dc2696's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
From: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by jmann
The issue was that the washers were sucked down into the head and cracked it. I wouldn't use the ARP ones even at 65#.
I've done a couple heads with ARP washers and never seen that happen, seems likely that it might have been an over-torque situation no?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.