Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Best Engine To Forge: 2003 Vvti Or 1999 Vics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
GrahamC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Total Cats: 11
From: Fife, Scotland
Default Best Engine To Forge: 2003 Vvti Or 1999 Vics

Hi guys. I have 2 spare engines and all the parts to build them with forged pistons, rods, billet oil pump, ARP studs, ACL bearings etc. If you had the choice, which would you build to install in a 1994 1.8 Eunos and why? I have an ME221 so I believe it can handle VVTI, but part of me wants to do the 1999 engine for simplicity with the fuel system.

FWIW both engines are UK (EUDM) engines.
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #2  
Neilv's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 163
Total Cats: 8
From: Niagara Falls NY/ Ontario, CA
Default

01+ motor because bigger thrust bearings and the head(because you can tune for it. Everything else is really interchangeable between them and especially because swapping into an NA chassis.

Assuming the VVT motor has the square top too IM too?

Search around for the differences between the 2 if you really want to know more
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Both have identical fuel systems. One will just have a little more low end torque with the VVT, but either one I'd throw the square top manifold (that should be on the EUDM VVT motor)

It's slightly more complicated, but realistically only one extra wire to control the VVT, otherwise above ~5000rpms (or even a bit less) the two heads are fairly similar.
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 03:50 PM
  #4  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

As long as the 99-00 block has done over ~50,000 miles it doesn't have the thrust bearing issue.
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 04:04 PM
  #5  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Both have identical fuel systems. One will just have a little more low end torque with the VVT, but either one I'd throw the square top manifold (that should be on the EUDM VVT motor)

It's slightly more complicated, but realistically only one extra wire to control the VVT, otherwise above ~5000rpms (or even a bit less) the two heads are fairly similar.
UK.

NB1 is return style, NB2 returnless.

Doesn't matter either way, stick the NB1 rail and accessories on the VVT motor if you want to do that.
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 04:07 PM
  #6  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

The real question is using a better ecu
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
GrahamC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Total Cats: 11
From: Fife, Scotland
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
The real question is using a better ecu
You lost me

Edit - I just read the whole thread that started as a HYDRA thread and turned into what seemed like a witch hunt on Motorsport Electronics, lol.

I have no affiliation with anyone, and have had an MSPNP, MSPNP2 and now running an ME221. Honestly the interface is completely different so it's a steep learning curve but its running my car fine so far. I decided to go with ME221 as - after 7 years out of the MX5 game - it's what everyone seems to be using (at least in the U.K.). Time will tell how I get on with it.

Last edited by GrahamC; Apr 12, 2018 at 05:41 PM.
Old Apr 16, 2018 | 11:12 PM
  #8  
ridethecliche's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 146
From: New Fucking Jersey
Default

Probably doesn't make a huge difference but the MBSP for the nb2 is 'better', however it requires modification if you're using ARP hardware.
Old Apr 17, 2018 | 10:36 AM
  #9  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

nb2 because of the mbsp. the nb1 will fit the mbsp no problem but if your comparing both of them as a "stock" bottom that would be my choice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miatarick
DIY Turbo Discussion
8
May 14, 2017 03:10 PM
Boost_addict
Build Threads
144
Sep 10, 2016 02:42 PM
husler
AEM
20
Aug 11, 2014 10:10 PM
Jfornachon
WTB
7
Aug 27, 2010 07:42 PM
Cpt_Slow
Engine Performance
0
Aug 10, 2009 06:33 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.