Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

No pcv valve, but catch can instead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2018 | 04:02 PM
  #1  
NASSEX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 190
Total Cats: -35
From: Baltimore; States
Default No pcv valve, but catch can instead?

Theoretically if you plugged off the pcv valve inlet to the intake manifold. Plugged that off. But use the pcv valve outlet nipple (on the intake manifold side of the valve cover) to run to a catch can which then routes either to atmosphere, or back to the intake (post air filter, pre-IAT sensor), would that be a good system to run? I am wondering if that would be okay. Why run the risk of pcv fault under boost when you can just remove it instead and use a catch can to atmosphere?

as for the exhaust side valve cover outlet, that would be the same. Just 3/8" ID vacuum hose to catch can and or vent to atmosphere.

should there be a problem with that system?

I'm looking to run 200whp turbo stock internals 1.8l NA.

I'm sure this might be answered but it's definitely not simple to find with searching, due to the wide variety of differing pcv setups and off-topic rambles being discussed.

Thank you for your guy's / gal's HELP!!

Take care & have a lovely day
Old Jun 29, 2018 | 07:49 PM
  #2  
afm's Avatar
afm
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 985
Total Cats: 510
From: Berkeley, CA
Default

It’s a bad idea. @Savington drops some wisdom here

Run the catch can on the exhaust-side vent only if you want a basic VTA setup.
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 03:51 PM
  #3  
NASSEX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 190
Total Cats: -35
From: Baltimore; States
Default

Thank you very much. That was exactly what i was hoping to learn. Didn't want to make anything to go wrong with something as little as that with how much time and work was just spent on the new setup. Appreciate you
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
NASSEX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 190
Total Cats: -35
From: Baltimore; States
Default

I apologize for the delayed response. Forgive me but i read over that thread and i didn't really see an answer to my question.

let me reword it a little less complicated.

Intake manifold is plugged (Where the pcv valve hose used to hook up to).

Pcv valve is deleted/removed. But the outlet is routed to a catchcan which is then VTA.

The exhaust side outlet is VTA.

Can someone explain what the problem is with just removing the pcv valve it self and running that kind of setup?

i can run 2 separate unrestricted catch can on each sides, but I'm using vta as an example. I can also route the exhaust side catch can into the intake post filter, pre turbo.

Last edited by NASSEX; Jun 30, 2018 at 10:21 PM.
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 05:53 PM
  #5  
afm's Avatar
afm
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 985
Total Cats: 510
From: Berkeley, CA
Default

Read the linked thread again, it literally addresses your exact question.
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
skylinecalvin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 486
Total Cats: 89
Default

Originally Posted by NASSEX
I apologize for the delayed response. Forgive me but i read over that thread and i didn't really see an answer to my question.

let me reword it a little less complicated.

Intake manifold is plugged (Where the pcv valve hose used to hook up to).

Pcv valve is deleted/removed. But the outlet is routed to a catchcan which is then VTA.

The exhaust side outlet is VTA.

Can someone explain what the problem is with just removing the pcv valve it self and running that kind of setup?

i can run an unrestricted catch can on both sides, but I'm using vta as an example. I can also route the exhaust side catch can into the intake post filter, pre turbo.
From my understand of the thread, it's

Intake Manifold - Capped
On the valve cover, Intake AND Exhaust ports are both vented to the Catch Can
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 10:15 PM
  #7  
NASSEX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 190
Total Cats: -35
From: Baltimore; States
Default

Originally Posted by skylinecalvin
From my understand of the thread, it's

Intake Manifold - Capped
On the valve cover, Intake AND Exhaust ports are both vented to the Catch Can
Yup. Thank you. I'm not really seeing where it explains why you cannot delete your pcv valve with a reason.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
NASSEX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 190
Total Cats: -35
From: Baltimore; States
Default

Originally Posted by skylinecalvin
From my understand of the thread, it's

Intake Manifold - Capped
On the valve cover, Intake AND Exhaust ports are both vented to the Catch Can
Ah my bad. Yes both are vented to a catch can. However, NOT the same catch can. AND PCV the piece it self, is deleted. Any issues or important problems with that setup?
Old Jun 30, 2018 | 10:55 PM
  #9  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Yes....read the thread.

Actually just read the linked post
Old Jul 1, 2018 | 12:10 AM
  #10  
skylinecalvin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 486
Total Cats: 89
Default

Going by the older thread, a general consensus (except for Sav) seemed like running both sides to catch can which then vta.
https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...-78293/page11/

Going by the newer thread, Sav points out why he sticks to the cap pcv/intake manifold and then exhaust side to catch can.
https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...2/#post1460667

Going by the above, when/if I decide to run a catch can, I plan on capping IM and PCV, and tapping the exhaust side with a -10AN line and running that to a catch can which then vta.

I apologize if my first post was wrong as I didn't read the air-oil-separator-filling-up-too-fast thread.
Old Jul 1, 2018 | 02:51 AM
  #11  
afm's Avatar
afm
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 985
Total Cats: 510
From: Berkeley, CA
Default

Originally Posted by NASSEX
Yup. Thank you. I'm not really seeing where it explains why you cannot delete your pcv valve with a reason.
Read harder.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrmonk7663
Engine Performance
5
Feb 6, 2019 10:47 AM
Der_Idiot
DIY Turbo Discussion
7
Aug 26, 2015 05:49 PM
timk
Race Prep
11
Nov 20, 2011 11:59 PM
jhoexp
DIY Turbo Discussion
9
May 8, 2007 12:40 AM
mxv
DIY Turbo Discussion
20
Jan 17, 2007 01:03 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.