C30-84 vvt motor dyno: 213/173
Hey guys did a dyno tune today with blacktrax.
(Thanks @Twibs415 for a solid street tune for Jei to build from) 2001 nb2 on ca91 octane w/ ac and no ps DYI MS3 pnp C30-84 rotrex with 2.5 inch cold side, 2 inch hot sidepiping with a fab9 stage 1 intercooler 75 mm pulley, saw 9.76psi of boost on the dyno Squaretop manifold with port matched skunk2 tb Id1050xs, dw200 fuel pump Unopened Stock motor @135k miles Rb header, 2.5 roadster sport with hiflow cat exhaust 213whp / 173 tq on a dynapack Next steps: e85, possible headwork with a engine refresh and also try to drive the damn thing. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...911e4c6657.png https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...33e3340e70.jpg |
Seems a little low on boost. Already checked for boost leaks?
|
Originally Posted by Beluci
(Post 1545709)
Seems a little low on boost. Already checked for boost leaks?
Theories we have on the 10 ish boost is restriction on the exhaust side: i'm running a stock head & a 2.5 inch exhaust with cat. If I were to port the head and remove the exhaust, I should be seeing more boost. |
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545723)
Prior to the tune, Twibs and I did a leak test, and found no leaks from Rotrex -> engine. Did find that I'm leaking oil out of the rear of the engine somewhere :vash:
Theories we have on the 10 ish boost is restriction on the exhaust side: i'm running a stock head & a 2.5 inch exhaust with cat. If I were to port the head and remove the exhaust, I should be seeing more boost. In surprised it made that little power especially on a dynapak. I would've expected at least 240whp with an MS3 and an -84. I'm prepping my car for a -94 and would have disappointed with less than 250 on that setup either a 94. Makes me slightly worried as it seems that half of people either make meh numbers or are really good. |
I make 9 psi at 7000 rpm with a 80 mm pulley and a C30-84 / NA8 engine. Compared to other builts it is on 1 psi less. But I'm 1900 ft above sea level.
Also I've got stock header, stock cat and a 2 1/4" catback. Thought about a restriction because of the cat aswell. But as bopob said, it shouldn't cause a pressure drop. Haven't dynoed it yet. 213 whp isn't to bad for 91 gas. I guess 240 is only possible with 93. |
This particular dyno is known to read 8-9% low compared to other dynos in the area. That would put this up in the 230 whp range, which sounds about right for an -84 with a squaretop on 91.
|
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545554)
C30-84 rotrex with 2.5 inch hot side, 2 inch coldside piping with a fab9 stage 1 intercooler
|
Thank you all for the feedback / comments. Definitely welcome the discussion!
Originally Posted by Bopop
(Post 1545735)
Increasing flow will decrease boost as it's a measure of resistance to flow.
In surprised it made that little power especially on a dynapak. I would've expected at least 240whp with an MS3 and an -84.
Originally Posted by Beluci
(Post 1545768)
I make 9 psi at 7000 rpm with a 80 mm pulley and a C30-84 / NA8 engine. Compared to other builts it is on 1 psi less. But I'm 1900 ft above sea level.
Also I've got stock header, stock cat and a 2 1/4" catback. Thought about a restriction because of the cat aswell. But as bopob said, it shouldn't cause a pressure drop. Haven't dynoed it yet. 213 whp isn't to bad for 91 gas. I guess 240 is only possible with 93.
Originally Posted by OneTwo
(Post 1545808)
This particular dyno is known to read 8-9% low compared to other dynos in the area. That would put this up in the 230 whp range, which sounds about right for an -84 with a squaretop on 91.
Originally Posted by poormxdad
(Post 1545812)
Is the statement above correct? I have the same intercooler, and the inlet and outlet are both 2.5".
|
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545814)
Yes. On the hotside I went with 2inch piping for easier routing around between the ac compressor and radiator fan. I use a 90 degree 2->2.5 inch coupler on the hotside of the intercooler.
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545814)
C30-84 rotrex with 2.5 inch hot side, 2 inch coldside piping with a fab9 stage 1 intercooler.
|
Originally Posted by poormxdad
(Post 1545815)
That's not what your original post says.
Originally Posted by poormxdad
(Post 1545815)
I made 213/175 with the C30-74, 80mm pulley, and the old Kraftwerks intercooler. Since then, I've upgraded to the Fab8 Stage 1 intercooler, and went from 1.75" to 2" hotside tubing. |
Originally Posted by poormxdad
(Post 1545815)
I made 213/175 with the C30-74, 80mm pulley, and the old Kraftwerks intercooler. Since then, I've upgraded to the Fab8 Stage 1 intercooler, and went from 1.75" to 2" hotside tubing.
|
Fwiw a stock na8 puts down about 97hp on this dyno on a good day.
|
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545814)
Buddy went from a 2.75->3 inch exhaust with his rotrex and his boost went up as well as power. I'm wondering if by opening up the exhaust you do increase flow, but the increased flow identifies other bottlenecks in the system and there boost increases?
We all know that there is pressure loss in the boost pipes and the intercooler due to inner friction. Why doesn't that count for a cat and a exhaust pipe aswell? Why should this cause pressure rise and not drop? |
Doesn't make sense
|
Originally Posted by jtt
(Post 1545818)
What octane fuel and type of dyno?
Originally Posted by HarryB
(Post 1545822)
Have you dynoed the car since?
https://www.miataturbo.net/superchar...rcooler-99360/ |
Overlap of camshaft profiles is why boost went up. Clearing out more pressure (bigger exhaust) on the exhaust side netted less back pressure during overlap against the supercharger.
here’s a question for you guys, lots of you guys are seeing around 10 psi on stockish motors. While myself and k24 are also seeing about the same with cams and heavily worked over engines. Wouldn’t the general theory be that with more flow would mean lower psi? |
Yes.
|
Jei's dyno is indeed a heartbreaker. I've seen full bolt-on K24A2s do 205/170 on that dyno.
|
Originally Posted by Twibs415
(Post 1545920)
Overlap of camshaft profiles is why boost went up. Clearing out more pressure (bigger exhaust) on the exhaust side netted less back pressure during overlap against the supercharger.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands