Clutch Upgrade from ACT Xtreme?
I have an ACT Xtreme clutch with the organic sprung disk. I think it might be going out, not sure, but I bought it 8 or so years ago used.
What clutch can I buy that has more torque capacity than this one? Is there anything stronger than this clutch with an organic disk? If I swap the organic disk for a puck disk, would that improve the torque capacity? |
949 twin disk is rated higher.
|
Originally Posted by Leafy
(Post 1276954)
949 twin disk is rated higher.
|
I am pretty sure that the 949 Clutch is the only OTS option that has a higher torque rating if you're using the 405 ft/lb version of the ACT clutch. You could always get a custom clutch made for your application.
|
Originally Posted by Ryan_G
(Post 1277141)
I am pretty sure that the 949 Clutch is the only OTS option that has a higher torque rating if you're using the 405 ft/lb version of the ACT clutch. You could always get a custom clutch made for your application.
Looks like I could potentially just swap to a puck disk and keep my PP and gain torque capacity? |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1277148)
Well, looks like I'm NOT running the 405 ft*lb version, that one has a puck clutch. Mine has an organic disk. But the Extreme version I see online now with an organic disk has a black pressure plate, mine is yellow like the 405 ft*lb version with the puck clutch. So not sure what mine is rated for.
Looks like I could potentially just swap to a puck disk and keep my PP and gain torque capacity? |
Originally Posted by Ryan_G
(Post 1277157)
I'm not exactly sure how much torque you plan on putting down but I can't imagine a 6 puck rated for 405 ft/lbs is going to be fun to drive. A FM2 is rated for 353 ft/lbs which is a metric fuckload of torque and it is easily daily driveable even in relatively heavy traffic. It's what I run.
I forgot about the FM2. Looks like I need to find out what my clutch is actually rated at to compare. You run the FM2, how do you like it? Any problems with it? |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1277158)
I dunno how much torque either, too soon to say.
I forgot about the FM2. Looks like I need to find out what my clutch is actually rated at to compare. You run the FM2, how do you like it? Any problems with it? |
I've run the act six puck for 10+ years and it wasn't too bad for street driving.
Most people who get in the car stall the fuck out of it though, so maybe I'm just used to it. It's not a clutch which is friendly towards modulation. When it engages, it is all the way on. Also, noise. |
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
(Post 1277196)
I've run the act six puck for 10+ years and it wasn't too bad for street driving.
Most people who get in the car stall the fuck out of it though, so maybe I'm just used to it. It's not a clutch which is friendly towards modulation. When it engages, it is all the way on. Also, noise. |
I hated my act xtg6 (6puck sprung) with a passion. But I'm a #becausestreetcar type of guy
not too bad when cold. on/off switch as soon as it heated up or in traffic |
Short answer, not really. Once it grabs, that's it.
Long answer is that since it's a sprung clutch, it will give a little as it engages, which means that you can get the car off the line quicker than you'd expect if your rpms are just right. A little faster and it spins like mad. A little slower and it bogs. It's not hard once you get the hang of it. |
the worst was the hop/shudder in stop-n-go traffic
when driven hard or racing, it was quite nice |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1277206)
I hated my act xtg6 (6puck sprung) with a passion. But I'm a #becausestreetcar type of guy
not too bad when cold. on/off switch as soon as it heated up or in traffic
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
(Post 1277214)
Short answer, not really. Once it grabs, that's it.
Long answer is that since it's a sprung clutch, it will give a little as it engages, which means that you can get the car off the line quicker than you'd expect if your rpms are just right. A little faster and it spins like mad. A little slower and it bogs. It's not hard once you get the hang of it.
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1277215)
the worst was the hop/shudder in stop-n-go traffic
when driven hard or racing, it was quite nice |
clutch "capacity" is often not even close to what's posted. I'm not sure how they really determine it, but for example the clutch in my wrx is rated to 330 and car is well over 400 and holds just fine, and it's awd so the clutch takes ALLOFIT
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1277227)
clutch "capacity" is often not even close to what's posted. I'm not sure how they really determine it, but for example the clutch in my wrx is rated to 330 and car is well over 400 and holds just fine, and it's awd so the clutch takes ALLOFIT
|
Just wanted to chime in. I DD an FM2 probably around 275whp and there is no mistaking, it is heavy. But perfectly livable and probably way stronger than I'll ever need. No chatter or any of that nonsense. It's great!
|
if you think the FM2 is heavy, try the XT ACT PP...
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1277383)
if you think the FM2 is heavy, try the XT ACT PP...
|
No, I think FM worked with their supplier to design the diaphragm in a way it wasn't that bad on the pedal.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands