Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain (https://www.miataturbo.net/suspension-brakes-drivetrain-49/)
-   -   door bars are worth every cent (https://www.miataturbo.net/suspension-brakes-drivetrain-49/door-bars-worth-every-cent-41818/)

hustler 12-09-2009 09:04 PM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 492197)
can someone post non-shitty pictures of them installed?

How about I kick your ass instead?

cueball1 12-09-2009 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by hustler (Post 493329)
How about I pound your ass instead?

corrected

hustler 12-09-2009 09:29 PM


Originally Posted by cueball1 (Post 493331)
errected

now its right.

NA6C-Guy 12-09-2009 10:01 PM


Originally Posted by hustler (Post 493335)
now its tight.

There

ZX-Tex 12-09-2009 10:07 PM


Originally Posted by bbundy (Post 493307)
In my professional opinion as a chassis structural engineer a flat plate on the bottom of the car will do next to nothing for stiffness. a flat plate to resist parrelelogramming like where one rail shifts forward and the other one shifts back will also do next to nothing in this case as well because I don’t thing that is a weak mode for the chassis to flex in.

Closing the bottom of the transmission tunnel in a structural way such that it makes the trans tunnel behave like a big tube rather than an open channel will do quite a lot. But you still have that torsion bar concept going on like where the material in the middle of a torsion bar adds minimal torsional stiffness. Hollow bar and a solid bar of the same OD have very similar torsional stiffness and yet the hollow one is ¼ the weight. The trans tunnel being in the center of the car isn’t as effective as material further away from the centroid like near the sills.

The stiffness that the FM butterfly adds to the chassis is mostly from its effectiveness at closing off the bottom of the trans tunnel making it behave like a tube. The problem I see is it could be designed allot better and be lighter than what it is to do this. It needs to bolt to the car near the edge of the tunnel not out by the frame rails. The later model factory braces are much better at doing this than the FM peace. I saw it as way to much weight for the benefit.

Bob

If I follow you here, as a chassis engineer/ME albeit for spacecraft, I agree. Put another way, if it were not for the trans tunnel the existing floor board would do a decent job of stiffening the bending mode you describe. Thus, it could be alleviated by closing out the trans tunnel.

I suspect the reason FM did the butterfly brace the way they did is it makes it more of a bolt-in proposition once the frame rails are in. Although, the fab involved in attaching a pre-formed piece to the floor board at the trans tunnel transition would not be much more work than installing the frame rails IMO.

If it were not for the transmission being in the way, an easy, mass-efficient way to stiffen this mode would be to cross-brace the rails by tying the front end of the left rail to the rear end of the right rail (and vice versa) using the same simple crushed end tubes like those at the k-member and the diff. There is some risk of column bucking I suppose since they would be in effect simply supported, and have a large length to dia ratio. Hell it could even be braced with pre-tensioned cables for that matter, just like the bracing on a string-truss Newtonian telescope tube. Same situation, just tubular instead of planar.

bbundy 12-10-2009 02:33 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex (Post 493346)
If I follow you here, as a chassis engineer/ME albeit for spacecraft, I agree. Put another way, if it were not for the trans tunnel the existing floor board would do a decent job of stiffening the bending mode you describe. Thus, it could be alleviated by closing out the trans tunnel.

I suspect the reason FM did the butterfly brace the way they did is it makes it more of a bolt-in proposition once the frame rails are in. Although, the fab involved in attaching a pre-formed piece to the floor board at the trans tunnel transition would not be much more work than installing the frame rails IMO.

If it were not for the transmission being in the way, an easy, mass-efficient way to stiffen this mode would be to cross-brace the rails by tying the front end of the left rail to the rear end of the right rail (and vice versa) using the same simple crushed end tubes like those at the k-member and the diff. There is some risk of column bucking I suppose since they would be in effect simply supported, and have a large length to dia ratio. Hell it could even be braced with pre-tensioned cables for that matter, just like the bracing on a string-truss Newtonian telescope tube. Same situation, just tubular instead of planar.

Go Park your car on some flat ground takes the roof off or put the top down open both doors and look at it from the side.

Other than the sills, the trans tunnel, and the wimpy so called frame rails it already is a flat plate trough the center of the car. To make it stiffer it needs added section modulus in the vertical direction to reduce vertical bending and torsion. A flat plate structure on the bottom of the car dosnt give section modulus in the correct direction. Spindly tubes replicating the flat plate is harldy better. Door bars do ad a huge amount of vertical section modulus though not as much as a real roof or a cage would. Also Converting the Trans tunnel from an open hat section to a tubular section also would significantly change the section modulus in both vertical bending and especially torsion.

Mazda I think was pretty on track on the Mazdaspeed as seen in the pic but I still think it can be done better.

Bob

jacob300zx 12-10-2009 02:36 PM

That mazdaspeed brace that is right by the cat is freakin heavy just an fyi.

bbundy 12-10-2009 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by jacob300zx (Post 493715)
That mazdaspeed brace that is right by the cat is freakin heavy just an fyi.

The FM butterfly weighs 32 lbs. I dont know the weight of the mazdaspeed brace but it didnt seem as heavy when I lifted both independantly.

I think there both too heavy. Door bars are lighter and they do more.

Bob

gospeed81 12-10-2009 03:16 PM

I love this thread.

I'm convinced I need door bars, and not just due to anectdotal evidence. Bbundy's reasoning makes tons of sense.

I still think they'd work even better if they went all the way to the firewall though.

wayne_curr 12-10-2009 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by gospeed81 (Post 493742)
I love this thread.

I'm convinced I need door bars, and not just due to anectdotal evidence. Bbundy's reasoning makes tons of sense.

I still think they'd work even better if they went all the way to the firewall though.

I've been convinced for a long time and cant wait to incorporate them into my car before next season. I think actually more than track/autox i'm excited to see what a difference this makes in daily duty comfort since my miata is my primary mode of transportation.

TrickerZ 12-10-2009 04:02 PM

dammit

+1 for door bars added to the wish list.

And I JUST knocked a couple off that list. It's never gonna go down, is it?

Braineack 12-10-2009 04:03 PM


Originally Posted by TrickerZ (Post 493770)
dammit

+1 for door bars added to the wish list.

And I JUST knocked a couple off that list. It's never gonna go down, is it?


I've always wanted them...and my 91 chassis is very loose compared to my 93. I've been trying to knock off parts from my list too, it's impossible.

mgeoffriau 12-10-2009 04:09 PM


Originally Posted by TrickerZ (Post 493770)
dammit

It's never gonna go down, is it?

Seek medical attention.

chpmnsws6 12-10-2009 04:14 PM


Originally Posted by bbundy (Post 493710)
Go Park your car on some flat ground takes the roof off or put the top down open both doors and look at it from the side.

Other than the sills, the trans tunnel, and the wimpy so called frame rails it already is a flat plate trough the center of the car. To make it stiffer it needs added section modulus in the vertical direction to reduce vertical bending and torsion. A flat plate structure on the bottom of the car dosnt give section modulus in the correct direction. Spindly tubes replicating the flat plate is harldy better. Door bars do ad a huge amount of vertical section modulus though not as much as a real roof or a cage would. Also Converting the Trans tunnel from an open hat section to a tubular section also would significantly change the section modulus in both vertical bending and especially torsion.

Mazda I think was pretty on track on the Mazdaspeed as seen in the pic but I still think it can be done better.

Bob



That underbody has more skid plates then a Jeep Rubicon! :laugh:

I'm not sure how tight Miata's normally are, but I get about an inch of flex front to rear when I jack the car up just infront of the back tire or just behind the front tire as a "door bar car". Doing the same on an Fbody produces around 10 inches of flex.... No joke

jacob300zx 12-10-2009 04:33 PM

My MSM was super stiff.

kenzo42 12-10-2009 04:37 PM


Originally Posted by jacob300zx (Post 493791)
My MSM was super stiff.

Pervert.

gospeed81 12-10-2009 04:44 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 493771)
I've been trying to knock off parts from my list too, it's impossible.

I crossed a LOT of stuff off the list I had made in August.

By the time I transferred over what I hadn't finished and added new stuff it was just as long...a full page.

My wife was laughing her ass off at me...but said she'd help me out by getting me a Hello Kitty steering wheel as a stocking stuffer.

Car sure will be nice when I'm done though.

mgeoffriau 12-10-2009 04:55 PM


Originally Posted by gospeed81 (Post 493798)
Car sure will be nice when I'm done though.

I know this is probably short-sight, since one's interests and tastes change over time, but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever? Mine is rust free with a straight body. Motors and parts are plentiful. I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget. Within a few years it'll be virtually worthless, so there wouldn't be much point in selling it.

jacob300zx 12-10-2009 05:08 PM

I might sell the one I have but I will always have a miata. Well let me put it this way, I'll always have a cheap sports car...the S2000 is getting cheap. Lets move this discussion to m.net ;)

gospeed81 12-10-2009 05:11 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever?


I'm actually planning on it. I stock backup parts second only to rharris. I've got 3 workable turbos for my oddball setup, and can almost switch straight back to stock.

$150 local jy 1.6Ls keep me happy.



Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget.

The ONLY thing I see on the horizon that could possibly lure me away from the Miata is the new Subota/Toybaru FT-86 IIIIFFFF everything they say is true. If they make a lightweight 200+hp rwd $20K sports coupe I'd be in.

But we know how these plans tend to change. If it's based on a Subaru boxster motor I can only imagine the aftermarket support would be great.

Tokyo 2009: Toyota FT-86 Concept Unveiled - egmCarTech

ZX-Tex 12-10-2009 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by bbundy (Post 493710)
Go Park your car on some flat ground takes the roof off or put the top down open both doors and look at it from the side.

Other than the sills, the trans tunnel, and the wimpy so called frame rails it already is a flat plate trough the center of the car. To make it stiffer it needs added section modulus in the vertical direction to reduce vertical bending and torsion. A flat plate structure on the bottom of the car dosnt give section modulus in the correct direction. Spindly tubes replicating the flat plate is harldy better. Door bars do ad a huge amount of vertical section modulus though not as much as a real roof or a cage would. Also Converting the Trans tunnel from an open hat section to a tubular section also would significantly change the section modulus in both vertical bending and especially torsion.

Mazda I think was pretty on track on the Mazdaspeed as seen in the pic but I still think it can be done better.

Bob

I think maybe we are talking about two different bending modes here.

JasonC SBB 12-10-2009 05:31 PM

Re: MSM

When I added the butterfly to my 2000, I could swear it ended up stiffer than my friend's MSM.

JasonC SBB 12-10-2009 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
I know this is probably short-sight, since one's interests and tastes change over time, but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever? Mine is rust free with a straight body. Motors and parts are plentiful. I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget. Within a few years it'll be virtually worthless, so there wouldn't be much point in selling it.

LOL. I go through this exact thought process whenever I consider spending more money on my miata.

TrickerZ 12-10-2009 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by gospeed81 (Post 493798)
Car sure will be nice when I'm done though.

Done? What is this "done" you speak of?


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
I know this is probably short-sight, since one's interests and tastes change over time, but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever? Mine is rust free with a straight body. Motors and parts are plentiful. I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget. Within a few years it'll be virtually worthless, so there wouldn't be much point in selling it.

I've said the same thing. It's a simple car, a blast to drive and you can replace ANYTHING on it for $300 or less (other than some performance add-ons).

bbundy 12-10-2009 06:36 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
I know this is probably short-sight, since one's interests and tastes change over time, but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever? Mine is rust free with a straight body. Motors and parts are plentiful. I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget. Within a few years it'll be virtually worthless, so there wouldn't be much point in selling it.

I've had mine since 92. I dont think I have ever owned anything that I have used and enjoyed for such a long period of time. No plans on getting rid of it ever. It is a 1990 with 300k miles on it. obviously some parts have been replaced.

Bob

bbundy 12-10-2009 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 493823)
Re: MSM

When I added the butterfly to my 2000, I could swear it ended up stiffer than my friend's MSM.

I wonder if that was because you added the frame rail reinforcements as well.

Frame rail reinforcement + soso making a tube out of the transmission tunnel > making a slightly better tube out of the transmission tunnel.

I don’t know for sure that is just my best guess.

Bob

JasonC SBB 12-10-2009 07:13 PM

Yes, FM's butterfly requires that their frame rails are in place. I installed em all at once.

And yet the door bars made a more dramatic improvement.
I suspect though that with the door bars, removing the butterfly/frame rails would be very noticeable. IOW they both help.

BTW I posted months ago on m.net that an easy way to measue stiffness would be to look for the dominant resonant frequency in the chassis motion in the left-right direction in an accelerometer mounted on the rollbar. The higher, the stiffer. In my car it was 17 Hz IIRC, with all the bracing in place. I don't have any before/after numbers though.

P.S. Here it is
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread...=accelerometer
The 17 Hz resonance is by far the largest resonance in the car, and it is largest in the left/right axis on the rollbar. This agrees with the butt-o-meter in that the chassis shudder feels like the seatback and the steering wheel are vibrating left-right (I'll bet, in opposite directions, due to chassis twist).

JasonC SBB 12-10-2009 07:20 PM

P.P.S. I wish there were a door design wherein when you close it, some kind of strong mechanism latches in and makes the door a load bearing member, to make it part of the structure. Would work great for convertibles.

levnubhin 12-10-2009 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever?

I'll eventually move up to an NB, then an NC. So I should have a Miata for at least the next 20 years. That is unless I can afford something like a ZR1 or maybe an Exige at some point.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

JKav 12-10-2009 08:05 PM


Originally Posted by bbundy (Post 493710)
Mazda I think was pretty on track on the Mazdaspeed as seen in the pic but I still think it can be done better.

Bob

Do tell--what would the better mousetrap look like?

NoMiEzMX-5 12-10-2009 08:39 PM

If mine doesn't get totaled or something catastrophic doesn't happen to it..im going to keep it as long as I live and I'm going to keep modding it..:D

1990 78k Original Miles, original paint, lots of Original stuff, 2nd owner..

Nomie

hustler 12-10-2009 10:09 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 493804)
I know this is probably short-sight, since one's interests and tastes change over time, but does anyone else feel like they will keep their Miata forever? Mine is rust free with a straight body. Motors and parts are plentiful. I don't see any automakers building a similar car that would be within my budget. Within a few years it'll be virtually worthless, so there wouldn't be much point in selling it.

Before I pulled the trigger on my build, I thought about where I came from with the VW catastrophe, my need for a "newish" car, my NEED to go to the track, and about where I want to put my money monthly (and its not $600 per month for a Subie).

There's no substitute for my car...and track rubber is only $600 a pop.

gospeed81 12-10-2009 10:52 PM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 493891)
P.P.S. I wish there were a door design wherein when you close it, some kind of strong mechanism latches in and makes the door a load bearing member, to make it part of the structure. Would work great for convertibles.

I've spent hours at night wondering this exact same thing.

I always end up thinking I'd be better off doing everything else first, or just putting in a real cage for the effort.

TrickerZ 12-11-2009 10:07 AM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 493891)
P.P.S. I wish there were a door design wherein when you close it, some kind of strong mechanism latches in and makes the door a load bearing member, to make it part of the structure. Would work great for convertibles.

I thought about this too. I'm not so sure you can do it in a way that would be user friendly, though. The best way to do it would probably be like a safe lock where you spin a gear to lock large bars into the front and rear of the door jam. I guess you could use a motor to do it and have some sort of gear lock, but it'd probably be loud and annoying to most people. Imagine having to wait for your door to unlock. And then what happens if it fails in an accident and you're stuck? Or just fails in general and you're stuck? Maybe a manual crank as well?

trickyrix 01-23-2010 12:12 PM

If this thread has taught me one thing, it's that I need to sell the Butterfly sitting in my garage and pick up a pair of door bars...

Good stuff.

Braineack 01-27-2010 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by cueball1 (Post 491673)
Hard Dog bolt in bars right?

Great review and good to know it makes a difference. Boss Frog slams them so much I was waffling. Got a set coming for the holidays now.


In what way do they slam them? on installation or just function? because they seem to be in the game now:

Miata Performance

http://www.bossfrog.biz/Miata_Performance/IMAG004.JPG

http://www.bossfrog.biz/Miata_Performance/IMAG006.JPG

http://www.bossfrog.biz/pdf/BF.DoorB...tions.0912.pdf

richyvrlimited 01-27-2010 04:44 PM

I'm no engineer so I can't comment on their functionality, but aesthetically they look utter garbage.

I had door bars with my old Carbing cage, I miss them, (but not the loss in legroom!)

ARTech 01-27-2010 04:54 PM

What size tubing is that? Looks small. To me, that design looks like it will crumble on side impact.

mgeoffriau 01-27-2010 04:58 PM

Seems like I recall BF slamming door bars unequivocally...until they introduced their own, then suddenly they were only slamming the other designs. The page explains their use of 1" tubing and sheetmetal instead of larger tubing.

It's ugly, but I could live with ugly if it was a truly superior design. They just lost some credibility with me when they changed their story about door bars (especially when consumer reviews of other doorbars are almost universally positive, even more so than roll bars, frame rails, butterflies, etc).

ZX-Tex 01-27-2010 06:50 PM

Without looking at their page, their design could be stiffer for the same weight or the same weight for the same stiffness. The plates would increase beding stiffness considerably in the plane of the plates (vertically as installed). Also it can be narrower with the smaller diameter tubing.

Nice idea from a purely mechanical standpoint but I do not like the look at all especially with the lettering cutouts. I still prefer the ones I have.

OK read the description..

Traditional single-tube door bars with two mounting points do little to stiffen the frame
:facepalm:
Clearly that is not true. Marketing-speak.

cueball1 01-27-2010 07:13 PM


Originally Posted by ZX-Tex (Post 514385)

:facepalm:
Clearly that is not true. Marketing-speak.


They've always contended HD's door bars do nothing. Obvious in this thread it's not true. Sure it bolts in only two places but it triangulates the door and rear bulkhead openings. Now they have theirs and it bolts in four places. It may be better but it sure looks fugly and a whole lot tougher for entry and exit.

hustler 01-27-2010 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by ZX-Tex (Post 514385)
Without looking at their page, their design could be stiffer for the same weight or the same weight for the same stiffness. The plates would increase beding stiffness considerably in the plane of the plates (vertically as installed). Also it can be narrower with the smaller diameter tubing.

Nice idea from a purely mechanical standpoint but I do not like the look at all especially with the lettering cutouts. I still prefer the ones I have.

OK read the description..

:facepalm:
Clearly that is not true. Marketing-speak.

Put a fucking pipe between the a-b pillars, bolt the shit together, get money, fuck bitches, go fast at the track, god damn.

02semiata 01-28-2010 06:45 AM

I Recall reading that boss frog was against the idea of door bars. I guess not anymore.... They call them frog ribs :giggle:

Frog Ribs (Door Bars) - MX-5 Miata Forum

gearhead_318 03-19-2012 09:15 PM

I realize this thread is older then dirt, but I've got questions.
Has anyone tried bossfrogs door bars, are they better then the hard dog door bars? Would they even fit since I've already got a HD rollbar?
How do door bars effect handling? Do they promote/diminish oversteer or understeer?

newold_m 03-20-2012 12:05 AM

The mounting point on the BF door bar does not match the HD rollbar and vice versa. BF has two bolts and HD has three.

gearhead_318 03-20-2012 12:15 AM

Thanks.

Ninjaneer 03-27-2012 10:32 AM

Any comparison of the HD Doorbars vs the DIY Roadster Bars?

I read over at m.net, the roadster bars are easier to get in and out of. However, it has a larger outside diameter.

Any interference with driver seating position?

Does the DIY Roadster bars bolt directly to hard dog roll bar mounting plates?

newold_m 03-27-2012 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by Ninjaneer (Post 854398)

Does the DIY Roadster bars bolt directly to hard dog roll bar mounting plates?

Yes, they do. I found them pretty easy to get in/out with stock seats. You slider over them and seat bottom is almost level. Because they angle out, I'd think there is more space with the DIY ones, but have not seen a HD bar in person. Also keep in mind the DIY ones will interfere with NB door pockets, again due to the bend. You can notch the plastic.

Ninjaneer 03-27-2012 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by newold_m (Post 854446)
Yes, they do. I found them pretty easy to get in/out with stock seats. You slider over them and seat bottom is almost level. Because they angle out, I'd think there is more space with the DIY ones, but have not seen a HD bar in person. Also keep in mind the DIY ones will interfere with NB door pockets, again due to the bend. You can notch the plastic.

Good to know, on my bucket list of things to buy.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands