Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Xidas rubbing on FUCA! HELP!

Old 07-11-2018, 06:59 PM
  #81  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,322
Total Cats: 2,369
Default

Originally Posted by Scaxx
I agree with Ian on this one, while George kinda muddied the waters a little with his bumpstop issue, it takes very little effort to give a quick, "heads up if you're running these two parts together" and it could have saved George's shocks in this case.
Nothing to do with the shocks. OEM Bilsteins will have the same issue. It's the Bauer ELBJ (that several vendors offer) combined with the eccentrics turned max positive camber and NB2 arms. Many already know this but not everyone. Like many know that OEM rear hub flanges time out, or OEM clutch slaves need to be replaced, or OEM rads are time bombs when they turn brown, or..

Again, it's not any vendors sole responsibility to issue warnings for every conceivable incompatibility, particularly with a non OEM dimension racing part intended for racing. We're adding a note to the ELBJ page that's something like: Check FUCA clearance to shock if you run the ELBJ on NB2 arms.

Summit Racing has maybe 100,000 non OEM dimension parts that may be incompatible with other parts of the car, and have no warning or instructions to that effect. Think about that for a moment.
This is never the sole responsibility of any race car parts vendor.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -8 Leave a negcat
Old 07-11-2018, 07:16 PM
  #82  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
This is never the sole responsibility of any race car parts vendor.
I'm not saying it is.

What I'm saying is that you recommend using the parts together, you know of a potential catastrophic failure resulting from doing so, and you chose not to mention it to your customers. I don't understand the reasoning for failing to go to a trivial amount of effort to prevent your customers from making a very expensive mistake that you could easily forsee.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat 14 Leave a negcat
Old 07-11-2018, 08:05 PM
  #83  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,322
Total Cats: 2,369
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
I'm not saying it is.

What I'm saying is that you recommend using the parts together, you know of a potential catastrophic failure resulting from doing so, and you chose not to mention it to your customers. I don't understand the reasoning for failing to go to a trivial amount of effort to prevent your customers from making a very expensive mistake that you could easily forsee.

--Ian
We have never had the issue on our own cars with ELBJ. Just wasn't on our radar. Sometimes folks in the field encounter problems before we do. So we added a blurb on the ELBJ page to check shock clearance with NB2 FUCA.
Goodwin posted something in their forum about three years ago regarding Bilstein to NB2 FUCA interference. Few other posts on facebook here and there. It's unfortunate that George didn't know to check for that while he was checking brake line to tire clearance (no brake line or ABS wire brackets on Xidas), sway bar to shock body clearance nor inspecting the car after the first drive to make sure everything was happy.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR

Last edited by emilio700; 07-11-2018 at 09:46 PM.
emilio700 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -9 Leave a negcat
Old 07-11-2018, 08:20 PM
  #84  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

I actually did check. But all the common problem areas are not where I am having issues. Its usually sway bar contact or something more in view, not directly behind the shock and out of site. Not to mention I use a floor jack and jack stands, not a lift where you can easily spot these issues (which is how I found it, on a lift).

brake lines are easy, zip tie to FUCA, no need to look behind the shock for clearance. I didn't even have my miata in 2015. And nobody really frequents the goodwin forum. I also have never seen anything on facebook about it.

Its just not something that I would have ever thought was possible. Also something that I would never have seen on my first drive around the block. Its a paved road, there is nothing to cause the shock to compress that far.
icantlearn is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:25 PM
  #85  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,322
Total Cats: 2,369
Default

Pic of your front camber eccentrics please
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -5 Leave a negcat
Old 07-11-2018, 08:29 PM
  #86  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

icantlearn is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:52 PM
  #87  
Newb
 
eddyc49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 10
Default

I have the same rubbing issue with my xida gs on an nb2 running poly bushings but an otherwise stock suspension and factory style alignment. Thankfully, I saw this thread, and i had only put on a few hundred miles so the damage is minimal.

While I agree that supermiata shouldn't be expected to be able to document every combination, it would have been helpful to have a (seemingly) previously known interference on a common chassis to be called out as a heads up on the website (similar to wheel and tire fitments on Goodwin's site).
eddyc49 is offline  
Old 07-11-2018, 09:24 PM
  #88  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
cowlover556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 21
Default

Emilio, were you aware of the issue before this post?
cowlover556 is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 09:45 AM
  #89  
Newb
 
Magic_Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 15
Total Cats: -1
Default

Not to fan the flames, but Mazda recommends you use Mazda parts. Once you stop doing that, to some extent you are on your own, and forums are no substitute for that (I mean, people like me can just post whatever they want! It's lunacy). The vendors are all trying to make this a safe and painless process so we buy more aftermarket parts, but they are human, too. Give poor Emilio a break
Magic_Smoke is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -8 Leave a negcat
Old 07-12-2018, 10:49 AM
  #90  
Elite Member
 
Scaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,651
Total Cats: 884
Default

Scaxx is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 11:02 AM
  #91  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,645
Total Cats: 3,009
Default

Xidas existed before ELBJs created this problem. The warning should be on ELBJs.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 11:04 AM
  #92  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

What about the cars without elbj's that have this problem? Maybe a warning on both, I dunno. I mean, it would take all of 5 minutes of effort either way
18psi is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:00 PM
  #93  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by cowlover556
Emilio, were you aware of the issue before this post?
concealer404 is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:07 PM
  #94  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Midtenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Posts: 2,041
Total Cats: 265
Default

While I may not always agree with the directness of Emilio's posts, I think he is fully in the right. As a vendor you test, test, and test to get the best product out there. However there are often variations that are unknown or come up after production launch. The variation in the hundreds of thousands NA and NB's is too much for them to know everything. Even just coming off the line the cars have crazy variations. I have friends who work and Nissan and GM plants and tell me horror stories of what is allowed to leave the plant all the time.

I am a big fan of the work SuperMiata (almost put 949 Racing) does for all their products. While the release dates may slip, you can be rest assured when the product comes out it'll be durable and well supported. That being said, they have no way to know of issues outside their testing without customer feedback. I've been there.

When Techno Toy Tuning started selling a panhard kit for the AE86, they sent it out with aluminum spacers (cheaper), but they crushed when you torqued down the bolt to factory specs. I found this out when they bound up the rod end and snapped. Luckily it was pulling into a packing lot because I was minutes from hitting up Deals Gap. So I did was George did, I posted on a popular forum warning people and contacted T3. After that, they started selling the kits with better spacers. If you find an issue, contact the vendor so they can aid in the investigation, do something about it, or make a note on their product listing.

Emilio and crew have posted on their product sale pages about this issue, but end the end it is the end users responsibility to check fitment before and after initial use. If you don't like a product or company, find another company or design a better one yourself.

Also, I assume its the same 4-5 people nega catting Emilio on this thread because everyone of his posts is -4 or -5. I just find it funny.
Midtenn is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old 07-12-2018, 12:14 PM
  #95  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

The thing is... this was a known variation by the vendor. Unless told otherwise, i'm not tearing down coilovers developed specifically for my chassis by the experts that come assembled just in the name of checking clearance/for an issue that i've never heard about despite the vendor knowing about it in the context of a car that is essentially a cookie cutter build. Vendor is aware of potential issue? Vendor should put note in box to tell customers to disassemble their assembled coilover setup because it might not fit as is. Super simple stuff. Zero effort on vendor part, certainly less effort than shaming a kid on the internet for not knowing a thing that nobody told him.

This doesn't affect me, i have an NB1 master race car and super rare widetrack option.

Either way, scenario is a **** sandwich. George could have done more. George should have heard/felt what was happening. E could have posted in a manner that didn't make it difficult to understand which person was the teenager and which one wasn't. Top marks for everyone.
concealer404 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat 11 Leave a negcat
Old 07-12-2018, 12:34 PM
  #96  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,322
Total Cats: 2,369
Default

Originally Posted by cowlover556
Emilio, were you aware of the issue before this post?
Nope. Other than a few Exocet owners deleting the require Exomotive shock spacers and having multiple problems (broken ball joints/tires rubbing chassis, messed up handling/ FUCA-shock interference). Deleting the Exomotive shock spacers allows the F & R suspension to compress about 2" further than it does on a Miata which as you might imagine, creates all sorts of problems.

The car we have in our shop matches Georges set up. Xida Gen 2, ELBJ, eccentrics adjusted outward.. has about 1/2" clearance. We aren't able to replicate it unless we turn the eccentrics full positive camber. Thus why I asked for pics of Georges eccentrics, which he posted. Dan, Sonny and John had no reports or knowledge of an endemic issue. We genuinely don't know why his car has interference unless something is bent. So as I stated earlier, it's was not on our radar and still seems to only affect a narrow range of users with ELBJ and any shock.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -3 Leave a negcat
Old 07-12-2018, 12:46 PM
  #97  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by doward
NB2 arms have the extra brace, as noted above.

However, that alone is not normally an issue. By chance, do you also have ELBJs or offset bushings installed and are running less than -3* camber?
Originally Posted by emilio700
Originally Posted by doward
Like I mentioned on the phone, the issue is a combination of
- NB2 UCA gusset takes away precious few mm of clearance.
- ELBJs that add too much camber for your current usage/height/whatever, so you've:
- Minimized camber with the cam bolts, which pulls the lower shock mount, and therefore shock body, inward towards the UCA gusset.

The very few cases I've seen have been NB2 only. This does not seem to happen on 90-00 suspensions, but Mazda has superseded the early arms with the NB2 part number. We will only see more of this going forward.
Adding back some camber with the LCA cam bolts will move the LCA and lower shock mount out away from the gusset, but may not give you enough clearance by itself.
Grinding away part of that gusset will make some room, but may not give you enough clearance by itself.

​​​​​​​
Originally Posted by emilio700
Nothing to do with the shocks. OEM Bilsteins will have the same issue. It's the Bauer ELBJ (that several vendors offer) combined with the eccentrics turned max positive camber and NB2 arms. Many already know this but not everyone. Like many know that OEM rear hub flanges time out, or OEM clutch slaves need to be replaced, or OEM rads are time bombs when they turn brown, or..

Again, it's not any vendors sole responsibility to issue warnings for every conceivable incompatibility, particularly with a non OEM dimension racing part intended for racing. We're adding a note to the ELBJ page that's something like: Check FUCA clearance to shock if you run the ELBJ on NB2 arms.

Summit Racing has maybe 100,000 non OEM dimension parts that may be incompatible with other parts of the car, and have no warning or instructions to that effect. Think about that for a moment.
This is never the sole responsibility of any race car parts vendor.
Originally Posted by emilio700
Nope. Other than a few Exocet owners deleting the require Exomotive shock spacers and having multiple problems (broken ball joints/tires rubbing chassis, messed up handling/ FUCA-shock interference). Deleting the Exomotive shock spacers allows the F & R suspension to compress about 2" further than it does on a Miata which as you might imagine, creates all sorts of problems.

The car we have in our shop matches Georges set up. Xida Gen 2, ELBJ, eccentrics adjusted outward.. has about 1/2" clearance. We aren't able to replicate it unless we turn the eccentrics full positive camber. Thus why I asked for pics of Georges eccentrics, which he posted. Dan, Sonny and John had no reports or knowledge of an endemic issue. We genuinely don't know why his car has interference unless something is bent. So as I stated earlier, it's was not on our radar and still seems to only affect a narrow range of users with ELBJ and any shock.

concealer404 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat 19 Leave a negcat
Old 07-12-2018, 12:50 PM
  #98  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Forum track record indicates otherwise
18psi is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:20 PM
  #99  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
George could have done more. George should have heard/felt what was happening.
Just so everybody knows, you cant hear/feel it happening over the noise and bumps in the road.
icantlearn is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:35 PM
  #100  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Took a peek under the car this morning. 949 race alignment & ride height (3.5 degrees negative, might be 3.75 I don't remember), Xidas, ELBJs.

My car has NB1 arms.



Front alignment cam is in the center, rear is hard outboard:



Other side looks OK:



--Ian
codrus is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Xidas rubbing on FUCA! HELP!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.