Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Nuclear agency approves first nuclear reactors since 1978

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2012, 07:52 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Enginerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,451
Total Cats: 77
Thumbs up Nuclear agency approves first nuclear reactors since 1978

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ove/53027204/1

Discuss.
Enginerd is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:54 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Waiting for Joe to post...
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-12-2012, 11:27 PM
  #3  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default




Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
Waiting for Joe to post...
Am I really that predictable?

I was certain that the Fukushima incident would set back US nuclear power another 30 years just like TMI. But this is very exciting news, and hopefully, the shape of things to come.

To be honest, I'd wished that the US would adopt something more like the CANDU reactor model (which is capable of operating on a variety of fuels, including spent fuel from PWR/BWR reactors and the warheads of dismantled nuclear weapons) however the AP-1000 is still a very good design, and all of its systems have been proven in existing GenIII facilities, contrary to what Mr. Stephen Smith claims.
Attached Thumbnails Nuclear agency approves first nuclear reactors since 1978-lxyw6.jpg  
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 02-12-2012, 11:49 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Yes you are. And I'm just glad that peoples retardation did not get in the way of nuclear power in America.
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:03 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Default

amazing.

The USA might stay a second world country.
Faeflora is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:15 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
elesjuan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
Default

Now if we could just get a ------- oil refinery...
elesjuan is offline  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:48 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
dc2696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
Default

Buy uranium stocks.
dc2696 is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:28 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Question

Originally Posted by elesjuan
Now if we could just get a ------- oil refinery...
What do you mean? The USA has a pretty fair number of oil refineries.

List of US oil refineries
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:35 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
What do you mean? The USA has a pretty fair number of oil refineries.

List of US oil refineries
Yeah, but none built in the last 30 or so years. We need more. I wish they would just build one in ND, then they wouldn't have to pipe oil all the way to the gulf, only to turn around and truck it back up.
Stein is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:10 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Enginerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,451
Total Cats: 77
Default

Permits are hard to come by to build a new facility anywhere. Rather than build new, most oil refining companies double, triple, quadruple the size or the existing facilities...hence the desire to build a pipeline from Canada to Houston. Its more economical to send product to Houston.

I'm happy for new nuclear.
Enginerd is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:36 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Stein
Yeah, but none built in the last 30 or so years. We need more. I wish they would just build one in ND, then they wouldn't have to pipe oil all the way to the gulf, only to turn around and truck it back up.
Originally Posted by cymx5
Permits are hard to come by to build a new facility anywhere. Rather than build new, most oil refining companies double, triple, quadruple the size or the existing facilities...hence the desire to build a pipeline from Canada to Houston. Its more economical to send product to Houston.
Ah, 10-4 on the new construction aspect (assuming it's true; I haven't bothered to confirm but sounds more than plausible). I would think most of the pipelines would be headed for Cushing, but it would seem to make sense to have some additional capacity in ND.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe Perez
Current Events, News, Politics
8
09-30-2015 04:41 PM
mgeoffriau
Current Events, News, Politics
19
11-21-2010 01:15 AM
Joe Perez
Current Events, News, Politics
48
09-07-2010 01:10 PM
Braineack
Insert BS here
26
07-14-2010 05:40 PM
thasac
DIY Turbo Discussion
8
03-31-2010 10:55 AM



Quick Reply: Nuclear agency approves first nuclear reactors since 1978



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.