Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2012, 03:09 PM
  #181  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 337
Default

Debunked: Gun Control Laws Reduce Crime Independent Journal Review


Sorry, preaching to the choir.
olderguy is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 12:39 AM
  #182  
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Default

No wai...

Idiots.

Bushmaster XM15-E2S AR15 .223/5.56mm Hvy Brl 223 : Semi Auto Rifles at GunBroker.com
Stein is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 01:03 AM
  #183  
Junior Member
 
plucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 74
Total Cats: 45
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
You only have to read some of the other works by the Founding Fathers to know this. The Constitution wasn't the only important document written 200 years ago. The easy read is The Federalist Papers, but just about anybody back then who laid quill to parchment has some endearing quote about how important it to have a well armed populace to ensure both the "group" and "individual" securities of the nation.

Agreed. The Anti-Federalist Papers are also good to read since it is a reason we have the bill of rights.

American citizens should have the right to own any weapon they please if it can be carried or not. Shall not infringe is pretty simple to understand to me and the Bill of Rights are specifically individual rights.
plucas is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 06:59 AM
  #184  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

You gotta be shitting me.
rleete is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 09:04 AM
  #185  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

So, from reading the Connecticut assault weapon ban, it looks very similar to the Clinton-era one. It also looks like there are probably any number of ARs that could be configured to avoid there definition.

I'm only lightly familiar with ARs, but I know you can get them with a fixed stock (and obviously without a bayonet lug or grenade launcher). I am assuming you can get them without flash suppressors (or they can attach something similar but call it something different).

Am I understanding that correctly?


Also, can anyone think of a semi-automatic rifle that would be comparable to an AR or AK but does not look like a scary black rifle? Something a non-gun person would think looks like a "hunting rifle?"
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 10:03 AM
  #186  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

An SKS without the bayonet and having the fixed mag doesn't look too bad. Hell, it even uses the same round. Unfortunately, they're very innaccurate.
rleete is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 10:10 AM
  #187  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
Also, can anyone think of a semi-automatic rifle that would be comparable to an AR or AK but does not look like a scary black rifle? Something a non-gun person would think looks like a "hunting rifle?"
How comparable? Ruger Mini-14's and Mini-30's are fairly innocuous in their wood-stocked format, but they still have high capacity magazines.

Attached Thumbnails Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?-index.jpg  
mgeoffriau is offline  
Old 12-24-2012, 10:25 AM
  #188  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Perfect. The Mini-14 Ranch Rifle is what I am looking for, especially because it does still accept high-capacity magazines. I'm trying to illustrate that the nature of the Clinton-era and current Connecticut AWB's are based on appeareances and not function.


Something interesting that I found recently was that Connecticut did recently try to pass a law restricting high capacity magazines (I think anything over 10 rounds), including a confiscation of existing legally owned magazines. It failed to gather enough support to go to vote.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-26-2012, 05:27 PM
  #189  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Post

Originally Posted by samnavy
[...]There is very little gun-violence in countries where civilians are not allowed to own guns... VERY LITTLE.

However, the rates of VIOLENT CRIME far surpasses the United States. I hope the British can sleep well at night enjoying their moral superiority about not having any guns as their criminal element stabs, beats, poisons, burns, rapes, and bludgeons themsleves at 4x the rate we do it here.
So I have been doing a lot of research on the topic of "gun control" lately and decided to see if I could verify claims like nations with strict gun control laws have higher violent crime rates than the USA as a trade-off of fewer firearms-related homicides. Likewise, I wanted to see if the USA really did rate as a much more violent place than the "civilized" lands of Developed Europe, Japan, Canda and Australia. I added Finland as an interesting mix of Scandinavian-Russo-European with what I understand to be fairly lax firearms rules relative to the Continent.


What I found was that the UK (England & Wales) has a MUCH lower homicide rate (USA = 317% higher), a MUCH lower major assault rate (USA = 775% higher), a lower reported rape rate (USA = 18% higher) but a higher robbery rate (UK = 29% higher).

Australia is "worse" than the USA in rape, burglary and motor vehicle theft by huge margins but "better" in terms of homicide, major assault and robbery.

Japan - with the most onerous of gun ownership hurdles as far as I know - has the lowest of virtually all the reported crime rates.

On the other hand, Finland is "better" than Australia and Canada in most of the fields - but second to the USA in this group for homicides.



Comparing statistics across countries is always a challenge and I am sure the sources I cite will be challenged as inherently biased and anti-gun, but it's what I could find that was a primary statistical analysis that tried to account for the variations in dates and methodology.

The attached image is what I was able to put together in a sort of visual format. The numbers represent rates (number of crimes per 100,000 population). The temperature scale should be read as "green = low rates in that stat relative to other nations on the chart, red = relatively high rates and yellow as in between."

Sources: UNODC Global Study on Homicide 2011

The United Nations Surveys on Crime Trends and
the Operations Criminal Justice Systems
- Most data used is as of 2006

United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Attached Thumbnails Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?-crime-rates.jpg  
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:55 AM
  #190  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Cultural/societal differences are likely to play a major role in the variations between the countries. Perhaps sampling the same country's rates pre- and post-firearms bans might normalize the results for cultural variations.

Spartans were known to be of a more violent culture than Thebians.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 10:10 AM
  #191  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Cultural/societal differences are likely to play a major role in the variations between the countries. Perhaps sampling the same country's rates pre- and post-firearms bans might normalize the results for cultural variations.

Spartans were known to be of a more violent culture than Thebians.
When this is done it has been shown time and time again that at best strict gun control laws/bans have very little benefit (i.e. within the margin of error) and at worst it shows that while gun fatalities fall overall violent crime rises and gun crimes without fatalities stay the same or increase. The two countries that are used the most for comparison are the UK and Australia.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 10:54 AM
  #192  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
rleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,593
Total Cats: 1,259
Default

Articles: Murder by Numbers


Some quotes:
...the murder rate is historically low and is already trending downward. In fact, the murder rate in 2011 was the lowest since 1961...

And:
In over 52% of the murders in the US in 2011 in which the race of the murderer was known, the murderer was black. Over half of the victims of murder were also black. But blacks are only 13.6% of the population. Put all that together, and the murder rate in the US for non-blacks was more like 2.6 per 100,000 in 2011.
rleete is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 11:07 AM
  #193  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
When this is done it has been shown time and time again that at best strict gun control laws/bans have very little benefit (i.e. within the margin of error) and at worst it shows that while gun fatalities fall overall violent crime rises and gun crimes without fatalities stay the same or increase. The two countries that are used the most for comparison are the UK and Australia.
I hear this repeated as a truism but have not seen any source data to back it up. I'm certainly open to it being true, but would really like to see some data (and not just in an editorial piece).

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Cultural/societal differences are likely to play a major role in the variations between the countries. Perhaps sampling the same country's rates pre- and post-firearms bans might normalize the results for cultural variations.

Spartans were known to be of a more violent culture than Thebians.
I think culture and socio-economics has a lot to do with it. If you consider that the USA has such a diverse geographic and societal spread, you will find most of the high murder rate areas located in very small geographies. For a given city, you might have the majority of murders located in a few really bad neighborhoods.

Then again, Japan seems to have the same level of fixation with violence that the USA does in their movies, video games, etc. Their reported violent crime rate seems to be a fraction of the USA's.

Then you have Australia, a country often joked to have been colonized by a bunch of criminals and convicts. They speak English, their country is even shorter-lived than the USA, they have access to most all the same media, etc. Again, their violent crime rates seem to be significantly lower than in the USA.

However, you make a great point in asking what the rates looked like prior to and after the highly restrictive firearms-related legislation went in to place.

Figure 1 : Homicide victims, 1989-90 to 2005-06

Source: AIC National Homicide Monitoring Program (NHMP), 1989-90 to 2005-06 [computer file]

Figure 2 : Rates of recorded assault, 1995-2006

a: Age data available for 1996 to 2003 only
Note: Rate is per 100,000 relevant population
Source: ABS 1994-96 National crime statistics; ABS 1997-2007 Recorded crime: victims, Australia
Attached Thumbnails Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?-tandi359-1.png   Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?-tandi359-2.png  

Last edited by Scrappy Jack; 12-27-2012 at 11:11 AM. Reason: Added titles and source for charts
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:10 PM
  #194  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

So when does a scenario like this turn into the police coming to my house and investigating me because I might have been seen with an 11-rd magazine? When does the data from my background check on firearm serial number #### and the lack of an NFA registration become probably cause to search?
hustler is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:29 PM
  #195  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Cultural/societal differences are likely to play a major role in the variations between the countries. Perhaps sampling the same country's rates pre- and post-firearms bans might normalize the results for cultural variations.

Spartans were known to be of a more violent culture than Thebians.
This is why I have trouble believing that "less gun control is always good." It may well be true, but I have not seen anything to convince me yet. Look at Chicago. It still has a major problem with gun violence despite (in the past, it's now overturned IIRC) banning handguns. Is that because gun control doesn't work, or because of the socio-economic problems? How many states/cities/counties/whatever with very lax or no gun control also have gang problems?
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:48 PM
  #196  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Name:  u7qSl.png
Views: 28
Size:  734.9 KB
hustler is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:57 PM
  #197  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

thenuge and hustler - Right. I will try to find the source when I have a few minutes, but I believe there is a disproportionate number* of homicides in which the perpetrator is a black male and the victim is a black male. Like I mentioned, this is often concentrated in poor/"bad" neighborhoods.

How much of the crime and violence in those neighborhoods is related to drug trafficking?

How much of the (for-profit prison) incarceration rate is related to drug trafficking?


*Relative to percentage of total population
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 01:04 PM
  #198  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
thenuge and hustler - Right. I will try to find the source when I have a few minutes, but I believe there is a disproportionate number* of homicides in which the perpetrator is a black male and the victim is a black male. Like I mentioned, this is often concentrated in poor/"bad" neighborhoods.

How much of the crime and violence in those neighborhoods is related to drug trafficking?

How much of the (for-profit prison) incarceration rate is related to drug trafficking?


*Relative to percentage of total population
I appreciate the time and energy you invested, but I don't really give a **** about studies and statistics when it comes to this topic. I have the right to arm myself for protection, and that right "shall not be infringed".
hustler is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 01:08 PM
  #199  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by hustler
So when does a scenario like this turn into the police coming to my house and investigating me because I might have been seen with an 11-rd magazine? When does the data from my background check on firearm serial number #### and the lack of an NFA registration become probably cause to search?
If the ultimate goal is to recreate a Japanese or Australian-style firearms restriction, I do not see how they can permit "grandfathering" of existing firearms. This goes back to a point I think Sam made on page one of this thread (a great page, by the way!).

Those that want to use Australia and Japan as examples must acknowledge that the ultimate goal of legislation like the 2013 Feinstein proposal must be the confiscation and outlawing of currently existing and legally owned firearms.

It would seem to me to do very little good to eliminate the sale of new firearms without addressing the (hundreds of) millions already in existence.
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 01:15 PM
  #200  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by hustler
I appreciate the time and energy you invested, but I don't really give a **** about studies and statistics when it comes to this topic. I have the right to arm myself for protection, and that right "shall not be infringed".
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

A) How well regulated is the militia group you are a part of?

B) That right is already infringed in a number of ways. You can't buy an RPG, you can't walk around with a full-auto Thompson strapped on your back, you can't buy C4 explosives, etc. You can't even own a firearm if you are a convicted felon, if I recall correctly.


However, I do appreciate your honesty in saying, "No matter what the facts or reality is, I will never accept anything other than the religious-like perspective I currently hold." Unlike most people, you're honest about it.

I'm suddenly remembering the Spider-Man in a tree picture...

Hustler -> <- Jack
Scrappy Jack is offline  


Quick Reply: Gun Rights: Should you be allowed to own an RPG?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.