Bottom end inspection after seeing 8,800 RPM
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Bottom end inspection after seeing 8,800 RPM
So I recently cracked a 01 piston in half running 20 PSI boost with a lot of water injection, lots of timing, not enough fuel, high AITs, on pump gas. I think I simply reached the power limit for these pistons. This motor was previously behind a EFR 7670 for 700 miles at 17 PSI, and during that time it saw 8,800 RPM probably 200 times at the drag strip. I lowered the rev limit to 8,000 for the last 1,300 miles before I cracked a piston in half.
I expected to see destroyed/heavily worn bearings from the high RPM abuse. We all KNOW BPs don't like high RPM right? But surprisingly the bearings all looked fine! When I built this bottom end in 2013 I reused the old stock bearings as they were in pretty good shape. They all had a scratch or 2 in them, but overall looked pretty good. They look the same now as they did then, no visible wear/scoring/scratching, nothing! Granted I didn't plastigauge them, but I kinda expected that I would have hammered the bearings with that high of RPM but they look just fine. And this is with a stock VVT oil pump/pressure. Crank looks just fine as well. Basically other than broke in half piston the motor looks good.
These bottom ends are pretty tough! Now I'm questioning if 8,000 rev limit is on the side of conservative after seeing how normal the bottom end looked. Also I no longer feel the need to increase the oil pressure after seeing how normal these bearings look given the load/RPM they have been through.
I expected to see destroyed/heavily worn bearings from the high RPM abuse. We all KNOW BPs don't like high RPM right? But surprisingly the bearings all looked fine! When I built this bottom end in 2013 I reused the old stock bearings as they were in pretty good shape. They all had a scratch or 2 in them, but overall looked pretty good. They look the same now as they did then, no visible wear/scoring/scratching, nothing! Granted I didn't plastigauge them, but I kinda expected that I would have hammered the bearings with that high of RPM but they look just fine. And this is with a stock VVT oil pump/pressure. Crank looks just fine as well. Basically other than broke in half piston the motor looks good.
These bottom ends are pretty tough! Now I'm questioning if 8,000 rev limit is on the side of conservative after seeing how normal the bottom end looked. Also I no longer feel the need to increase the oil pressure after seeing how normal these bearings look given the load/RPM they have been through.
#3
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Thanks Ryan! I will no worries. This is how you learn, by doing. There's only so much you can learn by reading, some things need to be tested.
Another thing I learned is that the new rotating assembly that was built by a race shop, the hone they did is wayyyyyy smoother than the hone I did when I built the motor. Like, a lot smoother. Mine I did it with a 220 grit bottle brush hone. Theirs looks like a 600 or so by comparison. I think I must have way over done it when I did it. I want to call them just to see if they'll tell me what they used for the final hone. I'm guessing the reason this motor had not-ideal compression was from me using the wrong hone on the block.
Another thing I learned is that the new rotating assembly that was built by a race shop, the hone they did is wayyyyyy smoother than the hone I did when I built the motor. Like, a lot smoother. Mine I did it with a 220 grit bottle brush hone. Theirs looks like a 600 or so by comparison. I think I must have way over done it when I did it. I want to call them just to see if they'll tell me what they used for the final hone. I'm guessing the reason this motor had not-ideal compression was from me using the wrong hone on the block.
#7
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Castrol 10-30 conventional with a mazda filter.
I doubt I'll tear it apart again to take pics. If anything I should have plastigauged the bearings before so that I could do it now to compare, but I didn't. Either way they aren't destroyed, which is what I was expecting to see based on what I've read on the forums.
I doubt I'll tear it apart again to take pics. If anything I should have plastigauged the bearings before so that I could do it now to compare, but I didn't. Either way they aren't destroyed, which is what I was expecting to see based on what I've read on the forums.
#9
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
I think 10-30 is better for factory clearances/pressures.
#11
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
To be honest it was a few years ago when I really read into oils, and I just concluded that Rotella was not ideal for high RPM engines where film strength is important. I think they had another name for that actually, I forget. Anyways Castrol looked like a solid choice for performance/additives/price/availability so long as you're ok with keeping it changed/not running it to 280*F. I have a nice oil cooler now and after seeing this bottom end I feel much better about the switch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 02:44 PM