Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Why you dont cheap out on rods on a rebuild.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2009, 02:23 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
paulsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North wales
Posts: 60
Total Cats: 0
Default

On the subject of R package and SE cars having better internals it's quite feasable they picked the rods cranks blocks etc. that were closest to the blueprint and used them
paulsub is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 04:45 PM
  #42  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

Originally Posted by paulsub
On the subject of R package and SE cars having better internals it's quite feasable they picked the rods cranks blocks etc. that were closest to the blueprint and used them
Let's end this retardation right now. The origins of this myth go back to a magazine test of an R back in 94 or 95. The R ran .1 sec quicker 0-60 than the M of the same year. M.net morons then take that to mean that the R car must have a hotter mill.

Let's examine that a little. The stripper (read: base) R-pack with stiffer suspension runs a little quicker to 60 than a fully optioned up pig with crap suspension. Hmm.

You can thank our friend Don on m.net for coming up with this, as well as other gems such as shocks don't effect ride quality.

I would not be surprised if the manufacturer's test car they send out to the magazines were more carefully assembled than standard production models, but Mazda doesn't have the resources to expand that to production cars. This is not Mercedes AMG here.
The only car I'd believe might have a chance of having a tighter than standard motor would be the Club Spec cars, and even then I doubt it.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 04:56 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

^^^ I agree with your assessment; I was about to write something similar.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 04:58 PM
  #44  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
When I was a teenagers and in the first year of college I worked in a VW shop in a warehouse next to Norwood's place. The **** that rolls out of his shop is on another level. We always saw **** in there like Bugattis, Ferraris, Callaways, you name...wild ****.
I believe it. Clearly this guy is capable of some very serious builds. I am really impressed with that motor. Built from scratch, and designed specifically for drag racing.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 07:43 PM
  #45  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
240_to_miata's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cromwell, Connecticut
Posts: 2,605
Total Cats: 16
Default

wow this thread reminds me of how easily i bent my rod thsi summer. 200 rwhp and uneven compression across the cylinders is all it took for me.
240_to_miata is offline  
Old 10-25-2009, 11:41 PM
  #46  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Another reason not to believe the R-Package crap, my car is an R-Package and did that. Just saying.
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 10-26-2009, 01:50 AM
  #47  
Junior Member
 
spapida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: redondo beach, ca
Posts: 47
Total Cats: 0
Default

not that i have much weight here... but i agree, another naaay. A robot drops that motor in. I believe there are some that are better than others... but its luck of the draw

I think its def power, not det... a yay.

Maybe the reduced rod length lowered the compression ratio... therefore reducing cylinder pressure... lowering the forces the rod sees.

I know some "old school" engine builders that have seen it all... Im going to ask them if they have seen motors run strong like that.
spapida is offline  
Old 10-26-2009, 05:45 PM
  #48  
Junior Member
 
paulsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North wales
Posts: 60
Total Cats: 0
Default

Not heard the rumour until this thread just know that it wouldnt be hard to do from a manufacturing point of view cost effective is another story.
Totally agree with test cars fully blueprinted engines/ higher boost leaves the press raving
paulsub is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
interestedofold
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
09-29-2015 01:42 PM
Dparks7
Miata parts for sale/trade
1
09-28-2015 09:49 AM



Quick Reply: Why you dont cheap out on rods on a rebuild.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.