Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

The 2013 taxation thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2014, 09:44 AM
  #61  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

The amount of the income (and thus, the tax I will pay on it next year) is so low that I would gladly pay additional money to allow me to pay the tax on it this year.
If you feel that strongly about it, pay the anticipated Fed tax now (overpayment).

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

so that next year I don't have to file Schedules C and SE with the IRS and also have to deal with business income in New Jersey.
I'm sure you can convince somebody in the fine upstanding Gov Christie's tax dept you earned the income while in another state.....
bahurd is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 09:52 AM
  #62  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
No. I am a sole proprietorship.
Would it be worth it to become an LLC?

This is what my wife did, although she isn't in xxx,xxx income range, but approaching it gross wise.

However, she had approx. 2.75x the business expenses you did last year, so not sure if it would be advantageous for you.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 10:32 AM
  #63  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
If you feel that strongly about it, pay the anticipated Fed tax now (overpayment).
I don't mind the Fed tax, I'm familiar with doing that one. I'm just pissed that I have to separate my business income out across multiple states, despite the fact that I was a resident of CA the whole time I was actually operating the business.


Originally Posted by z31maniac
Would it be worth it to become an LLC?
At this point, I'm out of the game. Regular W2 employee, with a 401k and the whole nut.


Originally Posted by z31maniac
However, she had approx. 2.75x the business expenses you did last year, so not sure if it would be advantageous for you.
In 2012, my Schedule C Part II expenses were $23,000. In 2011, it was $51,000. That's more along the lines of what I'm accustomed to.

Still, I could never figure out how creating an S-Corp, an LLC, or anything of that nature would have benefited me, aside from creating a bunch of additional paperwork. I had a lot of people ask me that, but nobody could ever explain to me why I'd want to do it.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 11:05 AM
  #64  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Still, I could never figure out how creating an S-Corp, an LLC, or anything of that nature would have benefited me, aside from creating a bunch of additional paperwork. I had a lot of people ask me that, but nobody could ever explain to me why I'd want to do it.
In your position, as the sole owner, the only real reason might be risks of personal liability. As a sole proprietor you absorb all liability personally for the company vs an LLC (or a S-Corp) where the company has the risk, not the member (key point.... in most situations). Some people would say "what the hell, I have no property to go after anyway" but the liability is more than just property and today it's pretty damn hard to get out of the personal liability,

On the flip side, as an LLC (or S-Corp) the member can not usually represent themselves in a financial dispute (as in small claims court) and so the attorney's get fatter or the LLC just says '**** it' to the debt. Smart business people (or dishonest... you pick) understand this when paying monies due especially near the end of relationships/contracts. The point being, an LLC or a Corp can not represent itself in a court of law (in most states anyway).

In your case, if no 1099 was ever filed by the company paying the money I'd probably opt to 'forget it' until such time as someone in the state of NJ figured it out and sent you the 'hey WTF' letter. That happens more than you think....

Hell, by then you may be off to another state/country anyway.
bahurd is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 11:08 AM
  #65  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
In your case, if no 1099 was ever filed by the company paying the money I'd probably opt to 'forget it' until such time as someone in the state of NJ figured it out and sent you the 'hey WTF' letter.
Everything I do is 1099ed.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 11:09 AM
  #66  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Yeah, I don't know all the details, but essentially for what my wife typically grosses in a year, putting all the money into the S-Corp (thanks for jogging the memory that it's an S-corp not an LLC), then paying herself a weekly salary, she ends up paying less into the IRS than if she just files on her personal return.

You were probably making enough that it didn't work out in your favor. IIRC it essentially works if you're in the middle-to-upper middle (essentially $50k-120k gross per year).

But I only talked with her accountant long enough to make sure that since we are filing jointly this year, they could adequately separate our income so we aren't paying each others taxes.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 11:56 AM
  #67  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Everything I do is 1099ed.
Oh well, I'm sure you'll be getting a personal letter of thanks from the good governor.
bahurd is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 12:16 PM
  #68  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
You were probably making enough that it didn't work out in your favor. IIRC it essentially works if you're in the middle-to-upper middle (essentially $50k-120k gross per year).
I know that I've sat down and tried to do the math a few times, and I could never figure out a reason to do it.

Interesting that you mention the concept of "middle to upper middle" class. I have honestly never understood such distinctions, at least based solely on income. Income and class are not strongly inter-related.

I mean, a $100k job up in the Catskills would make you a 1%er. Here in Manhattan, that puts you near the poverty line.

Still, it's quite possible for a "wealthy" person in upstate NY to have little class, and for a "poor" Manhattanite to comport themselves like a Rockefeller.




Originally Posted by bahurd
Oh well, I'm sure you'll be getting a personal letter of thanks from the good governor.
So long as the streets are kept clear, I'll go ahead and pay my tax.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 12:26 PM
  #69  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I know that I've sat down and tried to do the math a few times, and I could never figure out a reason to do it.

Interesting that you mention the concept of "middle to upper middle" class. I have honestly never understood such distinctions, at least based solely on income. Income and class are not strongly inter-related.

I mean, a $100k job up in the Catskills would make you a 1%er. Here in Manhattan, that puts you near the poverty line.

Still, it's quite possible for a "wealthy" person in upstate NY to have little class, and for a "poor" Manhattanite to comport themselves like a Rockefeller.
You're interpreting class differently than I am using it. I'm not using it in the sense of "social class," like India's caste system.

I'm using it in the, "divide people based on income" sense. No more, no less. I'm not sure how one "comports" themselves as relevant to a discussion on taxes/income.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 12:43 PM
  #70  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
You're interpreting class differently than I am using it. I'm not using it in the sense of "social class," like India's caste system.
True, I got sidetracked a bit.

The underlying concept is that the relationship between income and "class position" varies greatly with geography. In all seriousness, living in some parts of the country, a $75k salary probably puts you in the top 1%, whereas in other areas, $75k means you're living in a crappy, run-down studio apartment in an iffy neighborhood, and commuting two hours each way to get to work.

I was just making an observation about the notion of "middle-to-upper middle (essentially $50k-120k gross per year)." Where I live right now, $50k means you have several roommates, while $120k puts you right at about average- not quite enough to be able to justify renting a parking space, but enough to live comfortably. (Certainly a long way from "upper-middle-class.")

By comparison, in the town I grew up in, $50k would have put you into a nice house in a neighborhood with an HOA, and $120k wasn't even a relevant concept for most people.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 12:55 PM
  #71  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
True, I got sidetracked a bit.

The underlying concept is that the relationship between income and "class position" varies greatly with geography. In all seriousness, living in some parts of the country, a $75k salary probably puts you in the top 1%, whereas in other areas, $75k means you're living in a crappy, run-down studio apartment in an iffy neighborhood, and commuting two hours each way to get to work.

I was just making an observation about the notion of "middle-to-upper middle (essentially $50k-120k gross per year)." Where I live right now, $50k means you have several roommates, while $120k puts you right at about average- not quite enough to be able to justify renting a parking space, but enough to live comfortably. (Certainly a long way from "upper-middle-class.")

By comparison, in the town I grew up in, $50k would have put you into a nice house in a neighborhood with an HOA, and $120k wasn't even a relevant concept for most people.
Oh yeah, I understand. Here in Tulsa, COL is crazy cheap. And if you're in any type of Technical/Engineering field, the Oil and Gas industry keeps your salaries up. That's part of the reason we stay, along with the fact that if we left we would lose my wife's income why she started over in another city, so it at least gives us the freedom to travel, etc.

But I was basing that on national averages, NYC along with the other top 10 markets in the US are anomalies compared to the rest of the country.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 02-16-2014, 09:22 PM
  #72  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Just finished Fed 1040, including Sch A, B, C, D and SE, plus forms 2210 and 3903.

Only three more complete returns to go...
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-16-2014, 10:59 PM
  #73  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Finished my taxes and got a very nice refund! But don't fret Joe, it was from an education credit and not from over-payment of my withholding taxes. It will all likely be spent on a combination of the miata and a vacation because I already contribute regularly to retirement and my emergency fund. This is fun money.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 02-16-2014, 11:05 PM
  #74  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Finished my taxes and got a very nice refund! But don't fret Joe, it was from an education credit and not from over-payment of my withholding taxes. It will all likely be spent on a combination of the miata and a vacation because I already contribute regularly to retirement and my emergency fund. This is fun money.
Hehe.

'Tis Ok. I owe the Fed about $4.5k, which is less than usual, but then 2013 was hardly a banner year. On the plus side, penalties are only $130, attributable mostly to an overpayment of ES #1, the complete nonpayment of ES 2-4, and the mitigation of W2 withholding during Q4. It was an odd and confusing year.

Now, onto the joy of CA form 540-NR; one of the least intuitive tax forms ever...
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-16-2014, 11:43 PM
  #75  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Hehe.

'Tis Ok. I owe the Fed about $4.5k, which is less than usual, but then 2013 was hardly a banner year. On the plus side, penalties are only $130, attributable mostly to an overpayment of ES #1, the complete nonpayment of ES 2-4, and the mitigation of W2 withholding during Q4. It was an odd and confusing year.

Now, onto the joy of CA form 540-NR; one of the least intuitive tax forms ever...
In all seriousness, why don't you have a CPA do your taxes? You seem to have relatively complex taxes and you have been discussing forms for over a week now. I do mine because they are still relatively simple and take me no more than 2 hours. I have to assume your time is worth more than you would have to pay someone else to do them for you.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 02-17-2014, 12:38 PM
  #76  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
In all seriousness, why don't you have a CPA do your taxes? You seem to have relatively complex taxes and you have been discussing forms for over a week now.
Oh, I suppose it's a combination of trust (I know my financial situation better than anyone else), lethargy / resistance to change (I've always done it this way), and whatever it is that causes people who can afford to pay someone else to work on their cars to instead build lavish garages full of expensive ship equipment.

I do actually intend to see a tax paperer (probably not a CPA) once I'm done with Fed and CA to get some region-specific advice on being a NJ resident who works in NYC (three different tax returns involved there), but after I figure out the specifics of that, I'll probably go back to doing it all myself again.

My taxes actually aren't all that complicated, there's just a large volume of paperwork. And it's not like I'm working on it full-time, just an hour or so every few evenings.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-17-2014, 03:03 PM
  #77  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

I am annoyed to have used a payroll service for paying my nanny because they do not spoon feed me information like "Make sure you enter the amounts from your 1040-ES coupons on our site into your tax return". I do not like ot be surprsied by a multi thousand dollar liability that doesn't really exist.

On the upside, I found the information I needed in less time than the online support queue took so now here I am chatting randomly with support people.

It turns out the estimated payments were within one dollar of my actual liability. I can deal with that.

Incidentally, it's nice to know that turbotax online has free CPAs. Even before you pay and file.
y8s is offline  
Old 02-17-2014, 06:29 PM
  #78  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

I used Turbotax years ago and H&R TaxCut for the last several years. It's pretty thorough, but there is a bit of a learning curve if you are doing oddball business deductions. It does let you compare year to year, which is nice for people who like to stare at data and marvel over % change. It also lets you compare your deductions and other data to national averages for your income level, which I find interesting.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 02-18-2014, 12:10 PM
  #79  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

I have an appointment scheduled next Monday at 11am with my tax guy. After TurboTax failing me horribly last year, I have no problem paying a professional a bit extra to make sure it is done right.
shuiend is offline  
Old 02-18-2014, 12:45 PM
  #80  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

I'm getting very frustrated with the folks doing our return. They have been handling my wife's business stuff for the last year, yet it's been over 3 weeks now and they still haven't filed.

Every other day, it's "Oh now we need this, now we need this, now we need this."

I'm surprised that a professional CPA and his staff don't have some type of document along the lines:

"Hi there business client, if we are to complete your tax review and filing for this year, provide the following information:
1. X
2. X
3. etc. etc. etc.

Thank you,
Professional CPA"
z31maniac is offline  


Quick Reply: The 2013 taxation thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.