Another 6 speed bites the dust.
#101
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Just FYI, the S15 Silvia guys have the same reliability issues we have at similar power levels. The gearboxes are also expensive.
#102
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Bbundy, what are your problems with the TII swap? That transmission will easily hold your power levels without question. The final gear shouldn't be much different than that of a 6 speed, realistically. I'd like to talk to you about it more, I think it could easily solve your problems. Those transmissions are inexpensive and most of the cost comes in our plate. Let me know if I can help you further or PM me if you have more questions. Best of luck in your search
3.483:1
2.015:1
1.391:1
1:1
.762:1
Those ratios are worse than the T5 ratios. Totally unacceptable for a track car IMO.
#105
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Not sure I like the gearing plus I don't like all the funky adapters and special parts required, movement of shifter location, and I think it all weighs at least 10 lbs more. My big complaint with the 6 speed gearing is I couldn't go fast enough in second for Autocross use. I never use second on any track however and I cured the second gear issue by turning up the rev limit to 8500 rpm and suddenly the gearing was pretty awesome almost always in the power band and can just rev it out on the long autocross straits past peak power but it still pulls.
#106
Funky adapters? 1 plate that bolts to the motor and you buy an Nc clutch disc for your current clutch setup, a new driveshaft and a trans bracket. It's not that much work for a transmission you won't break.
You're going to do what you like and I'm not arguing that this is the best thing on the planet but I'm just explaining to you and the other people reading this thread that it isn't that hard or a bad option. Obviously you're very particular about your transmission suiting your needs. Best of luck in your quest.
You're going to do what you like and I'm not arguing that this is the best thing on the planet but I'm just explaining to you and the other people reading this thread that it isn't that hard or a bad option. Obviously you're very particular about your transmission suiting your needs. Best of luck in your quest.
#107
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
NISMO Reinforced 6 speed Claims gear ratio selection and design allowed bigger more robust gears to be fit into the box. Again I’m still betting 6 speed Miata front belhousing casting and tail section casting and shift linkage can bolt up to any of the AZ6 AISIN family boxes. The design allowable engine torque for the NISMO box is listed at 289.3 ft-lbs. pretty close to what I am putting to the ground but I’m sure it is significantly Higher than The Miata Variant. gear ratios are kind of a tight ratio 6 speed and it doesn't have the stupid low first and second. probably would like a 3.909 instead of a 3.636 maybe.
NISMO | Silvia•180SX Reinforced Cross 6-Speed Transmission
Not a cheap solution.
http://www.frsport.com/Nismo-32010-R...5_p_26092.html
NISMO | Silvia•180SX Reinforced Cross 6-Speed Transmission
Not a cheap solution.
http://www.frsport.com/Nismo-32010-R...5_p_26092.html
Last edited by bbundy; 10-19-2013 at 05:19 PM.
#108
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
6 speed with 3.636 and 5 speed with 3.909: Both of these work for my purposes in terms of gearing. 5speed has better second gear for autocross. 6 speed might work better on the track with 3.909 but produces an un-usable second gear for autocross. 4th gear is a weak link in the 6 speed Miata box.
RX7 TII 4:10: Sucks for gearing worse than all others. Huge gaps in 80 mph and up range. A 4:30 would help a tiny bit for track use but would make second unusable for autocross. I would be unhappy with this.
RX8 3.636 : interesting they changed only 4th gear from the Miata Box and the change makes no sense from a gearing stand point. Id be willing to bet this change was made entirely to address weak fatigue strength in 4th gear!
S15 box with Miata 6th: With this I would swap 6th with miata gears which is easy. The stock 6th is way tall and probably for fuel economy not good for using it in anger. The result is a slightly tighter 6 speed slightly more useful second. One could only hope that the 4th gear is stronger than the Miata version. seems eqivelent Pricing to Miata 6speed.
RX7 TII 4:10: Sucks for gearing worse than all others. Huge gaps in 80 mph and up range. A 4:30 would help a tiny bit for track use but would make second unusable for autocross. I would be unhappy with this.
RX8 3.636 : interesting they changed only 4th gear from the Miata Box and the change makes no sense from a gearing stand point. Id be willing to bet this change was made entirely to address weak fatigue strength in 4th gear!
S15 box with Miata 6th: With this I would swap 6th with miata gears which is easy. The stock 6th is way tall and probably for fuel economy not good for using it in anger. The result is a slightly tighter 6 speed slightly more useful second. One could only hope that the 4th gear is stronger than the Miata version. seems eqivelent Pricing to Miata 6speed.
Last edited by bbundy; 10-20-2013 at 03:30 PM.
#109
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Quafe wide 4:10: Decent track gearing second is actually too tall for
autocross use.
NISMO 3.909: Pehaps the ultimate of what I have looked at. Would take a few more revs in 6th on pacific but everything is better. NISMO claims Design torque for gears is 30%higher. In terms of fatigue life that is huge. Wish I had ~$6500 to blow on it.
autocross use.
NISMO 3.909: Pehaps the ultimate of what I have looked at. Would take a few more revs in 6th on pacific but everything is better. NISMO claims Design torque for gears is 30%higher. In terms of fatigue life that is huge. Wish I had ~$6500 to blow on it.
#110
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Interesting find FRS/BRZ has the same gear ratios as the S15 and Cusco sells this to make first and second gear taller.
2013-2014 Scion FRS 6spd MT Close Gear Ratio Transmission Gear Set -
2013-2014 Scion FRS 6spd MT Close Gear Ratio Transmission Gear Set -
#111
Late to the party here but I'd be interested to see one of the blown 4th gear boxes taken apart to see if it gives any hints about what is happening. My theory is you have an unusual car used in an unusual combination of events so it will take an unusual solution like those being discussed.
How many other cars are at ~350/350whp/wtq (you didn't turn yours down until recently), do autocross launches on 275s with a co-driver, and run >10 seconds below Spec records at ~2,500 pounds with driver on an unsprung clutch? That clutch puts a huge amount of stress directly on the gearset.
I picture the all the on/off power transitions and launching of the autocross season fatiguing parts of the transmission that don't get let go in 2nd gear but can't take it months later when you are blasting out of a corner or down the straight in 4th gear at peak torque. Other high power guys are consuming 6 speeds also but none at the same intervals as an oil change. I'm stating the obvious, but that transmission was fatally wounded already to blow up under 300wtq like it did.
Do you think you are going to keep the ~14 psi lower power level next season? I wonder how much of the extra 60whp is useable for autocross and if going to a sprung clutch disk would help the problem. I know they get slaughtered launching with 275 A6s but disks are cheaper than transmissions and basically the same time to replace.
Just throwing ideas out. I have a 4.10 R&P if you come to a solution that needs a new final gear and I'm sure I can help you dispose of that 3.63 set while we're doing the swap!
How many other cars are at ~350/350whp/wtq (you didn't turn yours down until recently), do autocross launches on 275s with a co-driver, and run >10 seconds below Spec records at ~2,500 pounds with driver on an unsprung clutch? That clutch puts a huge amount of stress directly on the gearset.
I picture the all the on/off power transitions and launching of the autocross season fatiguing parts of the transmission that don't get let go in 2nd gear but can't take it months later when you are blasting out of a corner or down the straight in 4th gear at peak torque. Other high power guys are consuming 6 speeds also but none at the same intervals as an oil change. I'm stating the obvious, but that transmission was fatally wounded already to blow up under 300wtq like it did.
Do you think you are going to keep the ~14 psi lower power level next season? I wonder how much of the extra 60whp is useable for autocross and if going to a sprung clutch disk would help the problem. I know they get slaughtered launching with 275 A6s but disks are cheaper than transmissions and basically the same time to replace.
Just throwing ideas out. I have a 4.10 R&P if you come to a solution that needs a new final gear and I'm sure I can help you dispose of that 3.63 set while we're doing the swap!
#112
Elite Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Late to the party here but I'd be interested to see one of the blown 4th gear boxes taken apart to see if it gives any hints about what is happening. My theory is you have an unusual car used in an unusual combination of events so it will take an unusual solution like those being discussed.
How many other cars are at ~350/350whp/wtq (you didn't turn yours down until recently), do autocross launches on 275s with a co-driver, and run >10 seconds below Spec records at ~2,500 pounds with driver on an unsprung clutch? That clutch puts a huge amount of stress directly on the gearset.
I picture the all the on/off power transitions and launching of the autocross season fatiguing parts of the transmission that don't get let go in 2nd gear but can't take it months later when you are blasting out of a corner or down the straight in 4th gear at peak torque. Other high power guys are consuming 6 speeds also but none at the same intervals as an oil change. I'm stating the obvious, but that transmission was fatally wounded already to blow up under 300wtq like it did.
Do you think you are going to keep the ~14 psi lower power level next season? I wonder how much of the extra 60whp is useable for autocross and if going to a sprung clutch disk would help the problem. I know they get slaughtered launching with 275 A6s but disks are cheaper than transmissions and basically the same time to replace.
Just throwing ideas out. I have a 4.10 R&P if you come to a solution that needs a new final gear and I'm sure I can help you dispose of that 3.63 set while we're doing the swap!
How many other cars are at ~350/350whp/wtq (you didn't turn yours down until recently), do autocross launches on 275s with a co-driver, and run >10 seconds below Spec records at ~2,500 pounds with driver on an unsprung clutch? That clutch puts a huge amount of stress directly on the gearset.
I picture the all the on/off power transitions and launching of the autocross season fatiguing parts of the transmission that don't get let go in 2nd gear but can't take it months later when you are blasting out of a corner or down the straight in 4th gear at peak torque. Other high power guys are consuming 6 speeds also but none at the same intervals as an oil change. I'm stating the obvious, but that transmission was fatally wounded already to blow up under 300wtq like it did.
Do you think you are going to keep the ~14 psi lower power level next season? I wonder how much of the extra 60whp is useable for autocross and if going to a sprung clutch disk would help the problem. I know they get slaughtered launching with 275 A6s but disks are cheaper than transmissions and basically the same time to replace.
Just throwing ideas out. I have a 4.10 R&P if you come to a solution that needs a new final gear and I'm sure I can help you dispose of that 3.63 set while we're doing the swap!
Autocross rarely sees 3rd gear almost always in second. 8400 rpm rev limit required. I did quite a lot of it this year though. Won national tour events Pro Solo and even won the Canadian national championship. Had a co-driver for all of it as well. So yea a shitload of abuse in first and second gear was inflicted. nothing done to 4th however.
From what I have been reading though I think the big problem is running around 35% more torque than a S15 AZ6 was designed for and I suspect the Miata version is even weaker.
#116
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
I have thought of this as well. Since piston engines don't generate power smoothly, but rather in a series of violent pulses like an air-impact ratchet, it would follow that removing the compliance and impulse smoothing would lead to higher momentary forces. An unsprung clutch, hard motor mounts, hard diff mounts, and, to a lesser degree, hard rear suspension bushings could contribute to the intensity of each impact.
Example: Lay a wheel bearing race on an anvil and strike it with a hammer and it leaves a pretty good dent in it. Put the race on a wood block and strike it and it doesn't hurt it nearly as bad. Put the race on a rubber block (like an old diff bushing) and strike it with the hammer and you will not hurt it much at all. The same amount of force was absorbed all three times with significantly different results to the metal race.
Driver comfort isn't the only reason a factory engineer builds compliance into any drivetrain. Component stress and fatigue life is a consideration.
Example: Lay a wheel bearing race on an anvil and strike it with a hammer and it leaves a pretty good dent in it. Put the race on a wood block and strike it and it doesn't hurt it nearly as bad. Put the race on a rubber block (like an old diff bushing) and strike it with the hammer and you will not hurt it much at all. The same amount of force was absorbed all three times with significantly different results to the metal race.
Driver comfort isn't the only reason a factory engineer builds compliance into any drivetrain. Component stress and fatigue life is a consideration.
#117
How many other cars are at ~350/350whp/wtq (you didn't turn yours down until recently), do autocross launches on 275s with a co-driver, and run >10 seconds below Spec records at ~2,500 pounds with driver on an unsprung clutch? That clutch puts a huge amount of stress directly on the gearset.
I wonder if this is the reason why Norwegians here (hf-mx5t & Inglar) are keeping their gearboxes together. IIRC, They both use FM lvl2 sprung clutch with their 400whp+ cars
#119
I really like the S15 6 speed for the street. There's one on ebay for $449, if the guts swap out that should end up cheaper and give you a taller 6th than a 3.63 swap. It looks even more attractive when you consider you could sell the S15 transmission with miata guts for little or no loss when you were done with it.
#120
I really like the S15 6 speed for the street. There's one on ebay for $449, if the guts swap out that should end up cheaper and give you a taller 6th than a 3.63 swap. It looks even more attractive when you consider you could sell the S15 transmission with miata guts for little or no loss when you were done with it.