Notices

WBO2 on a 2000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
r2t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
From: Boise, ID
Question WBO2 on a 2000

K... Here's my question. Can I replace the pre-cat narrow band O2 sensor with the WB and can I do so without it throwing a code? Or would I be just better off welding a bung on the header for the WB and let the two NB sesnsors continue to do their thing. I have the LC-1 WBO2 kit.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #2  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

Weld in a bung. I would suspect it will throw a code as the way the car tests cat efficiency is the difference between sensor one and sensor two. Take one out and it can't compare between the two.

Besides, bung one is likely too close to the turbo and would likely cook your WBO2 sensor sooner. Mine is right before the cat on my Begi pipe. It should be at least 18" downstream from the turbo. I know that some have run them closer but I wouldn't.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
TravisR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,547
Total Cats: 14
From: Houston, TX
Default

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/s...C-1_Manual.pdf
Pg 18
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
r2t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

Kewl guys...

Stein, I know that you're turbo'd, but I'm dealing with a SC and was wondering how far down stream I could mount the WB? My JR header is ceramic coated and I was thinking of putting the bung on mid pipe... Just fore of the cat but aft of where it bolts up to the header. Whatcha guys think.

I'm still debating which way to go...
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #5  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by r2t2
Kewl guys...

I was thinking of putting the bung on mid pipe... Just fore of the cat but aft of where it bolts up to the header. Whatcha guys think.

I'm still debating which way to go...
That's where mine is as well. Right before the cat in the midpipe.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #6  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

The Adaptronic doesn't return OBDII codes as far as I know. You can pull the second sensor out of the car and plug the hole. Install the wideband in place of the first sensor and feed the wideband signal directly... the Adaptronic will like that better than NB. This is assuming you're using it standalone.

If you're running it parallel to the stock ECU and need it to return codes, then still install the LC1 in place of the first OEM sensor, and use the SIMULATED NARROWBAND OUTPUT of the LC1 to feed the stock ECU. Almost all name-brand widebands will output a narrowband specifically to feed stock ECU's that can't interpret a wideband signal.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #7  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
If you're running it parallel to the stock ECU and need it to return codes, then still install the LC1 in place of the first OEM sensor, and use the SIMULATED NARROWBAND OUTPUT of the LC1 to feed the stock ECU.
If he did that, then the ECU would still throw a code for heater open circuit. He could of course install a resistor across the heater line to satisfy the ECU in that regard, but in the end I'm with Stein here. Install a dedicated bung in the midpipe just fore of the cat. Makes it easy to route the cables as well- attach the LC1 to the PPF, and run the cables up through a slit in the large shift boot.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #8  
r2t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 25
Total Cats: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

Excellent info guys... Stein/Joe, I think you've convinced me to just install the WB on the mid pipe. I also spoke to one of the guys at FM and he felt that I would save myself a lot of hassles if I did it your way...

So, I defer to the experienced opinions...
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #9  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

Wow, I have been elevated to "experienced" and mentioned in the same breath as Joe. I truly am not worthy of such praise, while Joe definitely is.

Just hang around here a bit and you will be fine. I had never touched a turbo before January. What little I know I learned here from people waaay smarter about cars than I am.
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 04:49 AM
  #10  
Jfornachon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Total Cats: 0
From: Chatsworth, SoCal
Default

I will most likely get scorned and flamed by who knows who, but here goes. I am going to be getting an Adaptronic soon. I would like to install a wideband in the factory location and retain the OEM sensor so that It wount throw a code. I can handle splicing and soldering things that is not a problem. This will be going into a 01 NBB.

I am looking into getting the AEM UEGO as the WB. I was thinking that I could wire up the sensor and run the guage and into the Adaptronic then jumper into the factory ECM so that the computer would not throw a code for no A/F readings. Is there even a code for that? Would it have any bearing on how the car would run without an A/F reading at the factory ECM?

I am not great at the electrical theory, but when a circuit is in parallel would not the voltage reading be the same no mater what branch of the circuit? Hence the reason that I was thinking of running a jumper.

Let me know your thoughts. Either way I don't care I just want to get some idea of which way to go. I would really like to not to start cutting my factory header. I there is somewhere that I can go to get more help please kick me in the right dirrection. Please don't just say install a bung. As I would like to figure this out. I will be going turbo soon Just have to save up some more money to get the kit installed properly.

Have a great day,
Jared

Last edited by Jfornachon; Nov 25, 2009 at 04:54 AM. Reason: spelling
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #11  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

The Bosch sensor likely won't live long that close to the head. Too hot there. The specifically recommend 24-36" downstream. Might be OK short term, but it is a $68 experiment. (IIRC, that is the replacement cost for the sensor).
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #12  
dgmorr's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,446
Total Cats: 6
From: Toronto, ON
Default

Can the WB o2 sensor be installed in the factory location of the second sensor on the NB (non-turbo) if no cat is being used, or is this too far downstream?
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #13  
Jfornachon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Total Cats: 0
From: Chatsworth, SoCal
Default

As long as there is no cat, no exhaust leak, and is locatedin the specified location then yah why not.

Hav a great day,
Jared
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rustbucket
WTB
1
Aug 31, 2020 11:30 PM
kr307
Meet and Greet
1
Sep 26, 2015 10:33 AM
AdoboMiata
MEGAsquirt
4
Sep 22, 2015 02:32 AM
skou
Miata parts for sale/trade
4
Sep 10, 2015 09:44 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.