Notices

boost overshoot arrester circuit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #1  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default boost overshoot arrester circuit

I have an AEM, a 5 psi wastegate can, 10 psi target, and a GT2560.

The AEM boost control algorithm is great (includes a 3D, TPS vs. RPM, boost target table), but for one thing. It has no 'D' term to help prevent overshoots. Tuning it, I either get slowish spoolup and little overshooting, or fast spoolup and massive(up to 4 psi) overshoots.

So I built an overshoot arrestor circuit. Because my wares are hard and not soft (i.e. I'm not a big software weenie), I built an analog circuit. Only took me a couple of hours lol.

The circuit cuts the power to the boost solenoid when the max boost target is gonna be hit in the next 150 ms given the rate of rise of boost. The idea is to pulse the solenoid open when overshoot is imminent.

It will not open the solenoid if the rate of rise is < 50 kPa per second. I determined this number from examining datalogs, overshoots only happen when boost rises >50 kpa/sec... and BTW I see >300 at say 5000 RPM, when I do a violent floor-lift-floor.

The circuit needs to tap into the MAP sensor, and has 2 *****:
- max boost target
- 'D' multiplier.
The latter **** simply adjusts the above-mentioned 150 ms number, from 100~300 ms.

It works pretty well after just 3 datalogged runs of tweaking. I used to get 4 psi of overshoots, I now get 0 to 0.7 psi.

Attached is the circuit's first iteration. It has been designed for the Smokorola 2.5 Bar MAP sensor. (MPX4250A)

On the left, from top to bottom, the terminals are: 12V, MAP sensor, MAP sensor ground. On the right is the output for the solenoid, the wire which normally goes to 12V. (i.e. the other wire for the solenoid goes to the ECU).

The left pot is for the D term, the right one is the max boost setpoint. The testpoint is for measuring the setpoint voltage - it has a 1:1 correspondence with the MAP sensor voltage at max boost.

I layed out this thing for SMD resistors and capacitors for compactness.
Attached Thumbnails boost overshoot arrester circuit-overboost-arrestor.gif  
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
aznDragonX's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 351
Total Cats: -1
From: San Francisco Bay area
Default

wow.. Jason..mind me ask you for help later locally when I am ready to put in my AEM?
- Jason
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 02:39 AM
  #3  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

While trying to improve my circuit I realized I could implement a real 'D' algorithm to add to the AEM's PI simply by processing the AEM's boost solenoid PWM output. My original circuit would reduce the overshoot but would sometimes cause undershoot, and if I tried to speed up the boost response it could still overshoot some.

So I built a circuit that implemented the 'D', and the results are attached. On the left is a typical overshoot without the D, on the right is with the 'D' circuit. Note that there is little overshoot even when I do a sudden throttle lift then floor it again, while at full boost, even at >5500 RPM.

Having a 'D' in many feedback loops is important.
Attached Thumbnails boost overshoot arrester circuit-boost-d.gif  
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

looks like it takes marginally longer to reach target? but nicely done on controlling the overshoot!
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Initially it rises just as fast as before, then when it's close to target (about 250 ms before it would hit and pass the target), it "rounds off" the boost trace as it settles at the target, as the D circuit opens the wastegate in anticipation of hitting the target.
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 11:45 AM
  #6  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

is the rounding for safety? usually you want to reach the setpoint fastest with minimal error, even if that error is slightly above the target (ie teeny overboost).
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Rounding is a consequence of the 'D' to prevent overshoot.

Think about running full speed towards a spot on the ground on a slippery floor. You need to start braking and slowing down soon so you don't overshoot your target.

Yes you can sacrifice and allow a bit of overshoot if it's OK to pass your target a bit and run back, by reducing the magnitude of the 'D' term, in order to hit (pass) your target a bit sooner.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
LucaCarMods
Build Threads
11
Feb 14, 2016 06:13 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.