Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

NC now a better option than NA/NB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2019 | 11:42 PM
  #21  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default


Old Nov 14, 2019 | 01:10 AM
  #22  
hks_kansei's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 298
Total Cats: 44
Default

Originally Posted by kevinspann
They're really not that heavy, easily fit more tire, and fit taller drivers better than an NA/NB. .
Yeah, people always carry on about the weight, but they're fairly comparable to the NB.

Quoted kerb weights:

NB8C - 1112kg (2451lbs)
NC1 soft top - 1105kg (2436lbs)
NB2 hard top - 1167kg (2573lbs)


At worst the NC is 55kg (121lbs) heavier than the NB
At best, 7kg (15lbs) lighter.
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 08:51 AM
  #23  
IanIsInTheGarage's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 134
Total Cats: 6
Default

Horray! I hope to see the development expand. Just hearing it's better for taller people is win win win for me. Could sell my NA for 3 NC's is a bonus as well.
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 08:58 AM
  #24  
Schroedinger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 790
Total Cats: 188
From: Atlanta
Default

There are a bunch of well sorted NC’s around here that were sold off cheap when the Barber school shut down. They are way, way faster than similarly prepped NA/NB. I’m assuming it’s mostly because they can fit more tire. Reliable as a hammer too.
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 10:20 AM
  #25  
cfdrifter's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23
Total Cats: 0
From: West coast
Default

Things are about to get interesting, looking forward to new developments.
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 11:01 AM
  #26  
nickt93's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 663
Total Cats: 36
From: Atlanta
Default

I want the NC to be a good platform, otherwise there is a 9 year gap in cheap/fully depreciated Miatas/MX5s headed our way. And my recent experience in sourcing a used VVT motor seem to indicate that some NA/NB parts are becoming more scarce. The last time I needed to buy a 1.8 was 6 years ago; for $700 I had plenty of local options. Last month I couldn't find any decent local motors for less than $1000, and there were far fewer options than a few years earlier. I ended up importing a motor from the UK. That may get us through the next few years, but what happens after that?
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 12:19 PM
  #27  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

For years we could find <3% leakdown used BP6D's locally for ~$900. Perfect race, Enduro or HPDE motor. Those days are gone. Now it's full $1500-$2500 rebuild on that same core that is avg 10% leakdown when you buy it for $1200.

The virtually endless supply of $600 2.5L 200hp motors and free step by step swap info is a major tipping point.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 12:34 PM
  #28  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

What is fragile about a C5?
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 12:42 PM
  #29  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by Supe
What is fragile about a C5?
Um, everything? I'm not referring to a full track prepped car. I'm referring to an 80k mile $14k craigslist car you slap some 285 Rival-S on a try to do a 8x 20 minute HPDE sessions over a weekend in 90° heat. $12-15k later that car will survive that weekend, but not straight off CL it wont.

Lest we forget, a stone stock but otherwise healthy $3500 CL NB1 can survive that same weekend with just a set of brake pads and a roll bar. Faster with a bunch of money dumped into it, but not needed.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Nov 14, 2019 | 04:01 PM
  #30  
Chris Robbins's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
From: Evergreen CO
Smile

I've owned my 2006 NC1 since new as a dual-purpose DD and autocross car in SCCA CSP class, stock motor with intake and exhaust and all the other *SP-allowed suspension/brake/wheel/tire upgrades. Car won at SoloNats in CSPL with Juliann Pokorny in 2009, and I trophied 4th in 2011 in CSP after leading Day 1. I even drove it from Dallas to Lincoln pulling my tire trailer! Now a trailer queen track-only car, in SCCA Time Trials Nationals I podiumed in 2018 (M3 class) and 2019 (new P3 class). My motor is now a 2013 2.0L MZR rebuilt by Jesse Prather and with Xero Limit (formerly Moto East) cams and intake and a PPE LTH with a ECUTEK RaceROM tune on E85. Still normally aspirated, I pulled 190whp and 147wtq (stock 132/125) on Jesse's dyno. Car handles like a dream and has been bulletproof. Happy to see they're finally getting the props they deserve!



Old Nov 14, 2019 | 09:03 PM
  #31  
Libertygoat's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Mew, Mew.......All enjoys.....I'm in love with that girl.........
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 05:41 AM
  #32  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

This is well timed to my interests, lol. I just bought a 2019 RF GT-S as a DD, so now I need a track car. I have previously driven an NC Cup Car (not the new Spec MX5) at COTA and I thought it was great fun. Having already had 2 NC's, I think they are vastly better than the 3 NB's I also had.

The NC2 Sport's are now at the 10kish mark, so I would rather go with one of those. The NC2's have lots of little reliability refinements over the NC1's that I think are beneficial, along with a much better engine. My plan is to do full bolt-on's, suspension, rollbar, seats, harnesses, and all that good stuff with the NC2's better set-up. Then build a 2.5 engine on the side when I am ready for a good chunk of more power. Dynotronics recently posted that ECUTek is working on implementing flex-fuel on the NC now, so that will be perfect for a high-compression 2.5 build.

I didn't like the street ride of my ND XIDA ACE's and I have never driven XIDA's for the NA/NB's. I have never experienced their supposed great street ride, but I have high hopes that the NC XIDA's will make my driven-to-the-track car tolerable to and from the track.
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 05:49 AM
  #33  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
The big difference for me was always that a bone stock 90 A package NA6 was a fantastic car right off the showroom floor. Faster and better if you spent time and money but damn good right off the bat. The NC1 OTOH, was pretty miserable until you fixed a bunch of things. Those "things that need to be fixed" are now dialed, the knowledge base solid. The key being the low cost of a NC1 donor cars ($4000~8000) and the relative ease of dropping a $900 2.5 MZR into it. Add in Goodwins new 17x10 wheels and upcoming Xidas and you have the foundation for a really fast and reliable $12k build. We're talking a 12:1 lbs /hp build with roll bar and race hard top skin with 255/40/17's. Such a car will vaporize a $12k NB build on track or autocross.
I am close to buying an NC2. Would it be wise to go straight to 17x10's and 255/40's or is that too much stick for stock power? The first mods I will do would be a Blackbird rollbar and other safety stuff. What do you think about the brakes? I was thinking about brake ducts, rotors, pads, lines, and fluid as a good first step, but I don't know if the massive wheels and tires needs more than that.
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 08:52 AM
  #34  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Why is this in the build thread section?
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 09:34 AM
  #35  
Uncle Hoonsalot's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 95
Total Cats: 15
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Default

I'm debating this very thing regarding my NB right now. I already own an NC, and my math shows somewhere around $15K to make it a bulletproofed track car that would still be enjoyable on the street for funsies.
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 10:32 AM
  #36  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Why is this in the build thread section?
Fair question. I thought it appropriate. Where would you suggest the mods move it?

Originally Posted by Chilicharger665
Would it be wise to go straight to 17x10's and 255/40's or is that too much stick for stock power?
Sorry you were never able to get your Xida ACE dialed. I don't recall us having many offline conversations or consultations to address any issues you may have had. The ACE setup on my 30AE are amazing.

255 on 17x10's with stock-ish power would be a good autocross setup. Possibly too much tire for track though. 2.5 bro.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR

Last edited by emilio700; Nov 15, 2019 at 11:21 AM.
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 11:15 AM
  #37  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

As much as I want an ND as a dual-duty car since I drive so little normally, an NC2/3 with a 2.5 swap later down the road, and light-duty tow vehicle as a DD is sounding very appealing.

I could get back to doing HPDE and maybe try out autocross.
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 11:20 AM
  #38  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

Side note: A 2.5 swap is good for what kind of REAL power? We've seen lots of inflated dyno's regarding some tuning on the NC and the ND.

Any mods to the 2.5 engine worth doing while it's out?
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 11:36 AM
  #39  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
Side note: A 2.5 swap is good for what kind of REAL power? We've seen lots of inflated dyno's regarding some tuning on the NC and the ND.

Any mods to the 2.5 engine worth doing while it's out?
Goodwin seems to be the experts there. 2.5L from that era rated 184bhp on CA91. NC's are light considering the tires that will fit. One of the main reason they are so fast. Contact patch to weight ratio of a bare bones HPDE prepped NC1 on 255's is very good.
Good thread on m.net from 2013. Guessing the most current swap info has some improvements. https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=522719
NC 2.5 FB group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2006740659573188

Sounds like 170whp with bolt ons for a 2.5. Our bone stock 88k mile NC2 made 147whp Dynojet on CA91. Mike states 140whp from the NC1 so gains depend on which gen you start with.

The MZR isn't as good as a K24 but easier and cheaper to swap in.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Nov 15, 2019 | 11:37 AM
  #40  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default 2.5 swap info from Armand Hindrichs

Courtesy of Armand Hindrichs 2.5 swap facebook group:


REQUIRED PARTS:
-Duratec (Mazda L) 2.5L motor (preferably Ford origin for better internals)
-Wiring pigtail to VVT solenoid on the 2.5L motor (Ford WPT1251)*
-VVT solenoid gasket from 2.5L valve cover (Ford BR3Z-6C535-B)*
-Larger injectors (2.5L injectors will work)
-Balance shaft delete set (=AT1x5sdFMVPOshm5nlbGPjkKi9r7TMLY2Tn1pcyhTgR7rnTgJ H237wSuKzNCx1ybJucAfp1lWL6ijvRzg5lfU2KH0m9I0IpTJWg WsKTNCujKxkyUEwwJpNzaCNW-UT0Hng]massivespeedsystem MAEN'8647)
-Timing kit for Duratec motors (for installing crank pulley) (=AT1x5sdFMVPOshm5nlbGPjkKi9r7TMLY2Tn1pcyhTgR7rnTgJ H237wSuKzNCx1ybJucAfp1lWL6ijvRzg5lfU2KH0m9I0IpTJWg WsKTNCujKxkyUEwwJpNzaCNW-UT0Hng]massivespeedsystem MATO'8754)
-Laser iridium spark plugs (NGK LTR5BI-13 if NA)
-Serpentine belt (6PK2310)
-Dipstick (Mazda PE07-10-450)
-2x diamond washers for crank assembly (Ford 1S7Z-6378-AA OR Mazda L3H5-11-407)**
-Crank bolt - (Ford 1S7Z-6A340-AA OR Mazda LF01-11-406)**
-2x Cam bolt - (Ford CV6Z-6279-A OR Mazda L568-12-428)**
-2x Diamond washers for cam (FORD 6M8Z-6278-A OR MAZDA L3K9-12-429)**
-Tube of RTV/liquid gasket


*Not necessary to order if it comes with the 2.5L
**One-time use part. Do not reuse.


Other part numbers:
-Exhaust studs on head (Mazda LFE2-10-104)
-Header-to-midpipe studs (Mazda L3M7-40-584)
-Alternate front engine cover which does not require modification for belt clearance (Mazda L3AW-10-500)
-Alternate block breather which does not require modification for intake manifold clearance (Ford 4L5Z-6A785-AA)


-Parts from stock 2.0L:
->oil pan
->oil pressure switch on oil filter perch (green)
->valve cover
->crank pulley
->fuel rail
->intake manifold
->pulleys & tensioner
->accessories
->intake manifold runner (should be ported to match 2.5L head)


Maintenance/upgrade opportunities:
-Rear main seal
-Front main seal
-Valve cover gasket
-Replace starter
-Clean intake manifold
-Clutch/flywheel
-Aluminum PCV breather
-Motor mounts
-EGR delete
-Cams
-Radiator
-Header/full exhaust
-Oil cooler
-Turbo/supercharger system
-Catch can
-Upgraded intake manifold


HOW TO CONVERT 2.0L to 2.5L:
-Remove oil pan, valve cover, intake manifold, and any other external accessories or attachments from 2.5L motor
-Remove sensor between cyl 2 and 3 on 2.5L motor
-Transfer VVT solenoid gasket from 2.5L valve cover to 2.0L valve cover
-Install balance shaft delete


-Port match 2.0L intake manifold runners to 2.5L, use RTV to seal to head
-Transfer crank pulley, replacing the diamond washers, replace the crank bolt with new, and torque to 71-76ft-lbs+ 90 deg
-The cam bolts must be replaced if cams are changed out, torque them to 51-55 ft-lbs
-Cut notch on timing cover to clear belt routing to power steering pump
-Transfer 2.0L components to 2.5L motor (motor mounts, pulleys, sensors, wiring harness, etc)-Swap the appropriate VVT solenoid connector on harness
-Install clutch/flywheel


HOW TO REMOVE IT FROM THE TOP:
-Recover AC system (optional but can make life easier)
-Drain engine oil and coolant
-Remove hood, battery & box, air box, and ECU & mount
-Remove plastic cowl covers and metal cowl cover brace
-Disconnect PS pump and move aside
-Disconnect AC compressor from motor (if system wasn't drained)
-Remove header & midpipe
-Remove transmission
-Remove motor
-Prepare 2.5L motor for installation (see above)
-Reassemble everything
-Refill coolant
-Refill AC system (replace the drier)
-Tune ECU


HOW TO REMOVE FROM BOTTOM:
-Recover AC system
-Drain engine oil and coolant
-Remove midpipe & disconnect driveshaft from diff
-Support transmission
-Remove PPF
-Remove shock tower nuts
-Disconnect PS pump
-Disconnect flexible clutch line
-Remove lower radiator supports
-Disconnect steering column
-Drain power steering fluid
-Disconnect upper and lower radiator hoses
-Support subframe
-Carefully remove the nuts and bolts that hold the subframe and underside brace
-Carefully lower assembly away from body (or raise body if on lift)
-Prepare 2.5L motor for installation (see above)
-Reassemble everything
-Refill coolant and power steering fluid
-Refill AC system (replace the drier)
-Bleed clutch line
-Tune ECU


Other torque values:
-Head stud/bolt torque sequence - 62inlb, 133inlb, 33ftlb, +90deg, +90deg (yes, that's twice)
-Cam cap torque sequence - 45-79inlb, 11-12 lbft
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.