Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Current Events, News, Politics (https://www.miataturbo.net/current-events-news-politics-77/)
-   -   The Braineack Challenge (https://www.miataturbo.net/current-events-news-politics-77/braineack-challenge-84191/)

Braineack 05-02-2015 08:00 AM

The Braineack Challenge
 

click to play



I challenge everyone taking the Eric Shepard challenge to please go live in the Mid East or South Asia for 1 week.

thirdgen 05-02-2015 08:09 AM

Click to play fail...smart phone isn't very.
I searched on YouTube though and found it.
I said it once and I'll say it again. Nigga's gonna Nig.
What does disrespecting the American flag have to do with retaliation against police brutality? Get a job sparkling wiggles.

Braineack 05-02-2015 08:30 AM

There's hardly police in Somalia. I suggest they try there first.

hornetball 05-02-2015 08:52 AM

Ignorant is ignorant.

emoximuu 05-02-2015 10:19 AM

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/700

(a)
(1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
(2) This subsection does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled.
(b) As used in this section, the term “flag of the United States” means any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form that is commonly displayed.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.
(d)
(1) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order issued by a United States district court ruling upon the constitutionality of subsection (a).
(2) The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal and advance on the docket and expedite to the greatest extent possible.

I'd just like to see this upheld...

Braineack 05-02-2015 10:20 AM

my punishment is better.

emoximuu 05-02-2015 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1228184)
my punishment is better.

I'd be all for an air drop into ISIS held territory.

Braineack 05-02-2015 10:35 AM

If you arrest them for stomping on the flag, they'll just get more pissed when they found out they broke the law again and going to face punishment over it. they'll blame the police, then rob a local business owned by their neighbor to protest police.

stratosteve 05-02-2015 10:40 AM

This process sounds familiar...

DNMakinson 05-02-2015 11:41 AM

Or if a woman, Somalia or Egypt with 90% rate of Female Genital Mutilation. Yeah, get your clit cut out. No abuse in tjat, only respect and freedom.

TorqueZombie 05-02-2015 03:31 PM

Most of these morons have never been to another country. While I'm personally not exactly happy with the state of things, stomping on the flag serves no purpose other than to get attention. Would be nice if a few were arrested for the infraction. If nothing else to give them something else to look retarded over.

thirdgen 05-12-2015 07:16 PM


This is why cops piss me off. Pig's gonna pig?

z31maniac 05-13-2015 07:07 AM


Originally Posted by emoximuu (Post 1228183)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/700

(a)
(1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
(2) This subsection does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled.
(b) As used in this section, the term “flag of the United States” means any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form that is commonly displayed.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.
(d)
(1) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order issued by a United States district court ruling upon the constitutionality of subsection (a).
(2) The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal and advance on the docket and expedite to the greatest extent possible.

I'd just like to see this upheld...


What is there to uphold?

Texas v. Johnson in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled flag burning (and presumably other desecration by default) is protected speech under the 1st Amendment.

Congress passed an Anti-Flag burning act in 1989, which was struck down by the court in 1990.

Braineack 05-13-2015 07:11 AM


Originally Posted by thirdgen (Post 1230851)
This is why cops piss me off. Pig's gonna pig?

The cop is protecting private property rights--it's like their one job.

These idiots have every right to disgrace the flag--you have no rights to intervene or steal their property.

But notice how much these guys, the ones protesting police and this country, love police when they need some help...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands