Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Braineack Challenge

 
Old 05-02-2015, 08:00 AM
  #1  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,123
Total Cats: 2,275
Default The Braineack Challenge

click to play



I challenge everyone taking the Eric Shepard challenge to please go live in the Mid East or South Asia for 1 week.
Braineack is online now  
Old 05-02-2015, 08:09 AM
  #2  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,002
Total Cats: 282
Default

Click to play fail...smart phone isn't very.
I searched on YouTube though and found it.
I said it once and I'll say it again. *****'s gonna Nig.
What does disrespecting the American flag have to do with retaliation against police brutality? Get a job sparkling wiggles.
thirdgen is offline  
Old 05-02-2015, 08:30 AM
  #3  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,123
Total Cats: 2,275
Default

There's hardly police in Somalia. I suggest they try there first.
Braineack is online now  
Old 05-02-2015, 08:52 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,168
Total Cats: 654
Default

Ignorant is ignorant.
hornetball is online now  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:19 AM
  #5  
Newb
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/700

(a)
(1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
(2) This subsection does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled.
(b) As used in this section, the term “flag of the United States” means any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form that is commonly displayed.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.
(d)
(1) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order issued by a United States district court ruling upon the constitutionality of subsection (a).
(2) The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal and advance on the docket and expedite to the greatest extent possible.

I'd just like to see this upheld...
emoximuu is offline  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:20 AM
  #6  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,123
Total Cats: 2,275
Default

my punishment is better.
Braineack is online now  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:25 AM
  #7  
Newb
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
my punishment is better.
I'd be all for an air drop into ISIS held territory.
emoximuu is offline  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:35 AM
  #8  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,123
Total Cats: 2,275
Default

If you arrest them for stomping on the flag, they'll just get more pissed when they found out they broke the law again and going to face punishment over it. they'll blame the police, then rob a local business owned by their neighbor to protest police.
Braineack is online now  
Old 05-02-2015, 10:40 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Marylandistan
Posts: 970
Total Cats: 74
Default

This process sounds familiar...
stratosteve is offline  
Old 05-02-2015, 11:41 AM
  #10  
Design Engineer
iTrader: (1)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 3,433
Total Cats: 452
Default

Or if a woman, Somalia or Egypt with 90% rate of Female Genital Mutilation. Yeah, get your **** cut out. No abuse in tjat, only respect and freedom.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 05-02-2015, 03:31 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,657
Total Cats: 64
Default

Most of these morons have never been to another country. While I'm personally not exactly happy with the state of things, stomping on the flag serves no purpose other than to get attention. Would be nice if a few were arrested for the infraction. If nothing else to give them something else to look retarded over.
TorqueZombie is offline  
Old 05-12-2015, 07:16 PM
  #12  
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,002
Total Cats: 282
Default


This is why cops **** me off. Pig's gonna pig?
thirdgen is offline  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:07 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,291
Total Cats: 124
Default

Originally Posted by emoximuu View Post
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/700

(a)
(1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
(2) This subsection does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled.
(b) As used in this section, the term “flag of the United States” means any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form that is commonly displayed.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.
(d)
(1) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order issued by a United States district court ruling upon the constitutionality of subsection (a).
(2) The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal and advance on the docket and expedite to the greatest extent possible.

I'd just like to see this upheld...

What is there to uphold?

Texas v. Johnson in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled flag burning (and presumably other desecration by default) is protected speech under the 1st Amendment.

Congress passed an Anti-Flag burning act in 1989, which was struck down by the court in 1990.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:11 AM
  #14  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,123
Total Cats: 2,275
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen View Post
This is why cops **** me off. Pig's gonna pig?
The cop is protecting private property rights--it's like their one job.

These idiots have every right to disgrace the flag--you have no rights to intervene or steal their property.

But notice how much these guys, the ones protesting police and this country, love police when they need some help...
Braineack is online now  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nick470
MEGAsquirt
7
06-16-2017 01:53 PM
konmo
MEGAsquirt
22
11-05-2015 02:32 PM
nick470
MEGAsquirt
1
09-30-2015 10:32 PM
IB Nolan
Front Desk
3
09-23-2015 08:32 PM
AlwaysBroken
Engine Performance
5
09-06-2015 12:53 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: The Braineack Challenge


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.