Riots in London
#4
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
I think as soon as a riot breaks out, law enforcement should be able to come in with non lethal means and just let loose on the crowds. I'd be willing to bet 95% of them are taking part just as an excuse to be destructive and act like a bunch of hooligans.
#10
Supposedly the Britons can't handle it so they've called in some peelers from Ulster. I've seen first hand what those RUC punks can do and know for a fact that they purposefully will shoot the footpath in front of demonstrators in order to score potentially fatal bounces.
Have you ever been shot by one of these? I took one to the back a couple years back from ~30 yards and it hurt like a ************.
Have you ever been shot by one of these? I took one to the back a couple years back from ~30 yards and it hurt like a ************.
#12
UK police forces are handicapped by "human rights", that's why they can do next to nothing in a riot. When they do act, many are accused of excessive violence, intentionally causing injury and actually inflaming the riot.
During previous rioting, a policeman shoved a man to the floor who then died of a heart attack. The officer was taken to court and was found guilty/negligent in causing the death (or something along those lines). I have heard nothing official in the officers defence but who's to say he wasn't being harassed and verbally abused by the man who would not move along when told and not desist in the harassment.
During a riot, British police ARE the thin blue line trying to contain violence and hooliganism, they are abused for hours on end by **** brained amoeba's with IQ's lower than an STD, so yes they do snap and "beat up innocent bystanders".
Current riots were caused by the death of a known criminal with gun history, there was a peaceful protest march which quickly got out of hand.
Why the **** were these people protesting? and why didn't they do something to stop him before it came to this?
Rubber bullets are for pussies, our boys like to get up close and personal
Personally I would like to go back to our old methods of 150 years ago, mounted police charging in with sabres drawn.
That's my rant for the day, bye bye for now
During previous rioting, a policeman shoved a man to the floor who then died of a heart attack. The officer was taken to court and was found guilty/negligent in causing the death (or something along those lines). I have heard nothing official in the officers defence but who's to say he wasn't being harassed and verbally abused by the man who would not move along when told and not desist in the harassment.
During a riot, British police ARE the thin blue line trying to contain violence and hooliganism, they are abused for hours on end by **** brained amoeba's with IQ's lower than an STD, so yes they do snap and "beat up innocent bystanders".
Current riots were caused by the death of a known criminal with gun history, there was a peaceful protest march which quickly got out of hand.
Why the **** were these people protesting? and why didn't they do something to stop him before it came to this?
Rubber bullets are for pussies, our boys like to get up close and personal
Personally I would like to go back to our old methods of 150 years ago, mounted police charging in with sabres drawn.
That's my rant for the day, bye bye for now
#14
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Yep, aerial drop of massive tear gas bombs, a small army of LEO in riot gear with rubber bullet weapons and tasers. Catch all of the ones seen looting and destroying property and ******* break their hands with a baseball bat. I hate pieces of **** who use stuff like this as an excuse to be a bunch of idiots.
#17
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
UK police forces are handicapped by "human rights", that's why they can do next to nothing in a riot. When they do act, many are accused of excessive violence, intentionally causing injury and actually inflaming the riot.
During previous rioting, a policeman shoved a man to the floor who then died of a heart attack. The officer was taken to court and was found guilty/negligent in causing the death (or something along those lines). I have heard nothing official in the officers defence but who's to say he wasn't being harassed and verbally abused by the man who would not move along when told and not desist in the harassment.
During a riot, British police ARE the thin blue line trying to contain violence and hooliganism, they are abused for hours on end by **** brained amoeba's with IQ's lower than an STD, so yes they do snap and "beat up innocent bystanders".
During previous rioting, a policeman shoved a man to the floor who then died of a heart attack. The officer was taken to court and was found guilty/negligent in causing the death (or something along those lines). I have heard nothing official in the officers defence but who's to say he wasn't being harassed and verbally abused by the man who would not move along when told and not desist in the harassment.
During a riot, British police ARE the thin blue line trying to contain violence and hooliganism, they are abused for hours on end by **** brained amoeba's with IQ's lower than an STD, so yes they do snap and "beat up innocent bystanders".