Michigan doing full sweeps of phones for traffic stops
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/34/3458.asp
The Michigan State Police have a high-tech mobile forensics device that can be used to extract information from cell phones belonging to motorists stopped for minor traffic violations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan last Wednesday demanded that state officials stop stonewalling freedom of information requests for information on the program. |
Unacceptable doesn't even begin to describe this one.
|
finally the ACLU is invovled in a case they should be.
if border patrol agents cant refit a battery in the cell phone of a suspected drug/human trafficker, then the state police has no right in illegally searching your phone. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719557)
finally the ACLU is invovled in a case they should be.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719557)
finally the ACLU is invovled in a case they should be.
Edit, what happens if you refuse? |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719557)
if border patrol agents cant refit a battery in the cell phone of a suspected drug/human trafficker, then the state police has no right in illegally searching your phone.
|
They probably practice this in china. Communism... yes!
|
Someone clue me in here: What are they electronically scanning from your phone?
|
who cares what they are scanning. it is not relevant to minor traffic stops.
At least facist states give you the percieved notion that you own your own property. |
I would generally be very forth coming and cooperative in the event of a traffic stop. If they want to search my car, then fine, as long as it isn't going to take more than 15 min. I'm not letting someone scan my phone and collect all of the data that's on it. Especially when it is information that would clearly need a search warrant in any other circumstance.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 719568)
Someone clue me in here: What are they electronically scanning from your phone?
|
you let cops search your car? why?
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719569)
who cares what they are scanning. it is not relevant to minor traffic stops.
At least facist states give you the percieved notion that you own your own property. I know its wrong and all, I just want to hear how they justify such bullshit.
Originally Posted by djp0623
(Post 719576)
It appears that they can pull any data off the phone, so if you carry around financial info, business info, porno pictures of your mistress, whatever it contains.
WTF??? lol |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719577)
you let cops search your car? why?
|
they've got nothing to see. say no.
|
They will not be searching my phone anytime soon.
|
around here (and most other places) if they demand to search your car and you refuse, they will impound your car. No ifs ands or buts about it
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719584)
they've got nothing to see. say no.
|
Originally Posted by BenR
(Post 719588)
In most cases they'll search it anyway.
thats when you call in a state trooper ;) |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 719587)
around here (and most other places) if they demand to search your car and you refuse, they will impound your car. No ifs ands or buts about it
show me California Code that says this. Refusing consent is NOT in and of it self probable cause. however If he is able to develop probable cause independant of your refusal, he will be able to obtain a search warrant. (drug sniffing dog, looking into windows, other BS) See Terry vs. Ohio, then this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_v._Long It does you best to move out of liberal states that do not care about individual's unalienable freedoms/rights. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719595)
thats when you call in a state trooper ;)
Do you do this often? |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 719599)
show me California Code that says this.
Refusing consent is NOT in and of it self probable cause. however If he is able to develop probable cause independant of your refusal, he will be able to obtain a search warrant. (drug sniffing dog, looking into windows, other BS) It does you best to move out of liberal states that do not care about individual's unalienable freedoms/rights. "we need to search your car. is that ok?" -"no. i've done nothing wrong and have nothing illegal in there" -"ok buddy, here's the deal: you either let us search your car or we impound it for a week and let you deal with the fees in addition to whatever we find" They searched his car. Didn't find jack shit. "let him off" with a fix-it ticket for some completely random bullshit. fuck the police. I fucking hate 99.99% of them and hope they die in a fiery crash while rotting in shit. |
I've never had issues with cops in TX. Although I have been pulled over more here in 1 year than I have in my life. But no tickets or searches.
|
I've had my vehicles searched more times than I can count. It's just easier to let them and not worry about it. I don't have anything to hide (except for that dead stripper that one time, thank God they didn't find her)
|
Originally Posted by FRT_Fun
(Post 719607)
I've never had issues with cops in TX. Although I have been pulled over more here in 1 year than I have in my life. But no tickets or searches.
|
http://gizmodo.com/#!5795369/the-han...rom-your-phone
This article explains what they are getting. The short of it is, everything you've ever done with your phone. texts, pictures, calls, emails, browser history, etc. I'm surprised that this is being attempted, this is a massive invasion of privacy and under any judicial scrutiny should be ruled unconstitutional. The people responsible for instituting this policy should be immediately removed from office or terminated whichever the case may be. I've seen some people say "I have no problem with Police looking at my information." The problem is you keep stretching the line of privacy and personal rights every time a policy like this is allowed to continue. Soon enough you get to a point where there is no right to personal privacy and people can be steamrolled by corrupt law enforcement with no defense. I know it borders on a slippery slope argument but that doesn't make it any less valid. |
The search of digital devices without a warrant is an ongoing area but I wouldn't hold out hope that the 4th amendment will be useful here.
The most recent decision is I believe from the california supreme court but they held that text messages etc were not protected during arrest. I think the pennsylvania supreme court had a ruling that said that messages could be read if they had probable cause. This is the CA supreme court decision THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) GREGORY DIAZ, ) ) Defendant and Appellant. ) ____________________________________) S166600 Ct.App. 2/6 B203034 Ventura County Super. Ct. No. 2007015733 My wife also knows someone working on similar case going before the Oregon supreme court later this week For now your best defense if you have anything you consider sensitive on your phone is password encryption or some have advocated programs to wipe your phone, I think some programs like mobile me or something have remote wipes of your phone as well. |
No ones searching my car or my phone unless they give me a really good reason. If you don't like that, I'll gladly go to jail.
|
Originally Posted by Fidgitk
(Post 719687)
http://gizmodo.com/#!5795369/the-han...rom-your-phone
This article explains what they are getting. The short of it is, everything you've ever done with your phone. texts, pictures, calls, emails, browser history, etc. I'm surprised that this is being attempted, this is a massive invasion of privacy and under any judicial scrutiny should be ruled unconstitutional. The people responsible for instituting this policy should be immediately removed from office or terminated whichever the case may be. I've seen some people say "I have no problem with Police looking at my information." The problem is you keep stretching the line of privacy and personal rights every time a policy like this is allowed to continue. Soon enough you get to a point where there is no right to personal privacy and people can be steamrolled by corrupt law enforcement with no defense. I know it borders on a slippery slope argument but that doesn't make it any less valid. Stealth97, it was for the Cali plates |
IM SO PISSED!
The ACLU got me to say something positive about them. UGHHHHHH. turns out this program has been in effect since 2006. An officer needs a warrant signed by a judge to use the device, or by consent. There has never been one complaint and/or lawsuit since its introduction 5 years ago. |
All worked up for nuthin'. Oh well. At least I know that there are other mt netters that value their privacy too.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands