http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpre...pg?w=500&h=321
Guess which government has enormous influence over every major economic decision... |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 808585)
....You just gave synonyms for self-regulating markets while attempting to claim it wasn't that,
What you are advocating, at least if I understand it correctly, already exists. This is the problem I have with the "no government" argument of binary thinking. If you dare open your mind, read the free pdf "Machinery of Freedom". I myself don't necessarily agree with it 100%, but it gave me a lot of food for thought. |
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 808650)
I long for the Bush era of contracting over what we have now. I agree with you for the most part, but I do not blame the contractor because federal contracting enables it. The federal contracting system is flawed because it assumes that procurement procedure will foster reasonable pricing. Unfortunately, it does not. It creates a microcosm where the grantee management of contracts and funds provide a gap where costs can be inflated to the maximum allowable for each award. This maximum allowable is also deemed the upper limit for "reasonableness", so the contracting officer cannot disallow it.
If the federal contracting officer had the ability to come down and slap the hand of the offender, this would go away. However, the government's MO is to award the funds, then at the end of the contract, after the A133 audit, see if there is enough fraud to warrant an investigation. I can't tell you what that minim dollar figure is, but it's above $400,000.00. Basically, what I'm saying is that if you steal/scam/cheat less than $400,000 of tax funds, you won't be prosecuted or even investigated. In the Bush era, a few choice contractors scored cash, but in my experience the work was completed. Under this administration the focus is providing funds to a select group of people |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands