Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

1.6-1.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #21  
kung fu jesus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 729
Total Cats: 0
From: irvine, ca
Default

if iwas going to swap in a 1.8, it would have to be a 99-00 motor or a '94 with a 99-00 head or it wouldn't be worth it to me.

every year that passes, there is less support for the 1.6. i love the 1.6 because it's smoother than the 1.8.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #22  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

i am not afraid to track mine at 107K now besides the dif. i should get atleast 200K if not oh well atleast 50K how many miles do you put on the car a year 15-20K that is along time.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #23  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by kung fu jesus
if iwas going to swap in a 1.8, it would have to be a 99-00 motor or a '94 with a 99-00 head or it wouldn't be worth it to me.

every year that passes, there is less support for the 1.6. i love the 1.6 because it's smoother than the 1.8.
I was thinking about scoring an NB from a salvage auction, stealing the entire drive train, then scrapping whatever is left. Is the swap pretty simple?
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #24  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

I'd say yes. It's the most simple swap going for the Miata (sans installing another 1.6) and it's heavily documented - and even supported with some aftermarket parts to simplify the install. Essentially nothing to figure out or fabricate. Ideally you want an NB head (non-variable valve) and na 1.8 bottom end- the earlier the better.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #25  
dc2696's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
From: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Default

I like my 1.8 and it revs to redline just fine. I would go with a 1.8 over 1.6 anyday.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #26  
mxv's Avatar
mxv
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 582
Total Cats: 0
From: South Carolina
Default

does the higher compression in the 1.6 counter the larger displacment of the 1.8 when it comes to spool?
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #27  
UofACATS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,017
Total Cats: 0
From: Tucson "it's 110º" Arizona
Default

They have different compression? The only differences i'm aware of are between the auto and the manual.

Also, higher compression does not help spool. Higher compression will help off-boost performance, and will help your engine get to the spool point faster, because it will be stronger off boost. Spool itself won't be affected

1.8 will spool faster.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #28  
lazzer408's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,011
Total Cats: 7
From: Illinois
Default

There's no replacement for displacement.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #29  
mxv's Avatar
mxv
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 582
Total Cats: 0
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by UofACATS
Also, higher compression does not help spool.
thats not true.

well my points were just added to my insurance policy and looks like i wont have enough for the 1.8 anyways :( looks like ill have to squeeze what i can out of the 1.6. Why do i keep hearing there is no replacement for displacement, on a 4 cylinder turbo board, shouldn't we be bashing that phrase?

Last edited by mxv; Sep 24, 2006 at 12:57 AM.
Old Sep 24, 2006 | 12:27 AM
  #30  
turbopezz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 865
Total Cats: 0
Default

turbochargers the replacement for displacement since 1905.........
Old Sep 24, 2006 | 01:38 AM
  #31  
lazzer408's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,011
Total Cats: 7
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by mxv
thats not true.

well my points were just added to my insurance policy and looks like i wont have enough for the 1.8 anyways :( looks like ill have to squeeze what i can out of the 1.6. Why do i keep hearing there is no replacement for displacement, on a 4 cylinder turbo board, shouldn't we be bashing that phrase?
The term holds tru for any engine/size/na/turbo/sc/etc. An engine is just a heat pump and the larger the displacement of the "pump" the more power it makes. We can't compair a 4 cylinder running 20psi against a stock 350 small block and say there both making 350hp. (even though thry are) Put that 20psi on the 350ci and what happens? and don't tell me "it'll blow up" -lol- because my comment was refering to the laws of physics not the reality of engine designs.

-LAZ
Old Sep 24, 2006 | 01:44 AM
  #32  
lazzer408's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,011
Total Cats: 7
From: Illinois
Default

Oh I got one. The 1.6 to the 1.8 is like the 305sb to the 350sb. Everyone would want the 350 right? Who wants that 305ci Camaro when there's 350ci Camaros out there? Or a v6 mustang when there's a v8? I personally, I don't want any Camaros. In fact, I sold my '85 Firebird with 67k garage kept miles in order to buy my Miata! =) Though I did buy my g/f a v6 Mustang. Hey it was a good deal. Shhhhh!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo94MX5
Miata parts for sale/trade
7
Apr 28, 2014 08:26 PM
rickyreese
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Feb 18, 2013 10:27 AM
astroboy
Miata parts for sale/trade
26
Feb 23, 2011 09:32 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.